The Last Great GDF BZ

Topic: Did Trump conspire with Russia to win the 2016 election.

My team: DDM, Silent Master, Myself

Opposition: Speak up amid you with to participate

Judges: Will be asking Bada, Backfire and Imp to judge, Alternate will be PR

Rules. Each team will be allowed one post collaborated as there opening statement.

One collaborated rebuttal for each team

One collaborated final conclusion for each team

So a total of 6 posts. Once all posts are made judges will be asked to render there decision.

Ramifications: the losing team has to wear the winning teams choice of signature for 3 years and concede that there was never any Russian conspiracy and that they were misguided. If the other side wins, the losing team has to wear a sig of their choosing for 3 years and has to conceded that Trump conspired with Russia.

Lol I knew he was going to say that line

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Topic: Did Trump conspire with Russia to win the 2016 election.

My team: DDM, Silent Master, Myself

Opposition: Speak up amid you with to participate

Judges: Will be asking Bada, Backfire and Imp to judge, Alternate will be PR

Rules. Each team will be allowed one post collaborated as there opening statement.

One collaborated rebuttal for each team

One collaborated final conclusion for each team

So a total of 6 posts. Once all posts are made judges will be asked to render there decision.

Ramifications: the losing team has to wear the winning teams choice of signature for 3 years and concede that there was never any Russian conspiracy and that they were misguided. If the other side wins, the losing team has to wear a sig of their choosing for 3 years and has to conceded that Trump conspired with Russia.

Leftists hate themselves and constantly try to change their identity.

If they lost, they'd create a new account. 🙂

Three years is too much.

Weeks?

Its not fair to expect ddm to face a team by himself. U should give him some help.

The other side argues that Trump conspired for ever three years. How about 3 months

Originally posted by Raptor22
Its not fair to expect ddm to face a team by himself. U should give him some help.

Noted douche👆

Originally posted by Impediment
Three years is too much.

Weeks?

Backfire and Bada have agreed to judge. Will you?

If yes then all we need is opposing counsel. I was thinking Adam, Rob and Bash

Originally posted by Raptor22
Its not fair to expect ddm to face a team by himself. U should give him some help.

haermm

I'm not as good as Quan. estahuh

Quan thinks that Thanos can defeat Morgan Freeman/God from Bruce Almighty.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Backfire and Bada have agreed to judge. Will you?

If yes then all we need is opposing counsel. I was thinking Adam, Rob and Bash

As long as it isn’t a dick waving contest, I will.

Originally posted by Impediment
As long as it isn’t a dick waving contest, I will.

B-but...I already brought it out n'everything.

This is cawkward.

Ok so we have our judges and one team.

Who will participate on the the other team.

I was hoping it would be Rob, Bash and Adam

Am i to understand that there's a hole to be filled on the side that thinks trump did conspire?

Trump didnt necessarily consciously collude, but he was obviously a key useful idiot in a larger cycle of ideological subversion, so to my mind despite trump's intent,or lack thereof, it doesn't matter because the end result is still helping the world wide march of communism. If that counts as a pro collusion view i would be willing to participate.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
The other side argues that Trump conspired for ever three years. How about 3 months

No, it is not. You either do not understand the argument you oppose, or you are misrepresenting to make it easier to defeat. Either way, it is not a fair scenario to ascribe a position to someone else and then demand they defend it. That is a Surtur tactic.

Originally posted by dadudemon
B-but...I already brought it out n'everything.

This is cawkward.

Pics or it didn't happen.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Am i to understand that there's a hole to be filled on the side that thinks trump did conspire?

Trump didnt necessarily consciously collude, but he was obviously a key useful idiot in a larger cycle of ideological subversion, so to my mind despite trump's intent,or lack thereof, it doesn't matter because the end result is still helping the world wide march of communism. If that counts as a pro collusion view i would be willing to participate.

The narrative from most on the left wasn't merely that Russians were trying to help Trump. Rather it was that Trump was actively colluding with the Russians and that their aide was responsible for him winning the election.

Except neither of those things have been proven to be true.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
No, it is not. You either do not understand the argument you oppose, or you are misrepresenting to make it easier to defeat. Either way, it is not a fair scenario to ascribe a position to someone else and then demand they defend it. That is a Surtur tactic.

So if you wish to participate let’s agree on the terms

The topic from the outset was pretty simple if you read it