Originally posted by FalconPaunch!
I think it was more the quick attacks on Trump vs. letting Harris' lies slide and how she spent most of the debate pulling faces. Yes, Trump said some insane shit, that's nothing new, I still don't really know what Harris actually stands for though...
Except that didn't happen. Trump literally lied non-stop and the mods only corrected him on a few claims like the cats/dogs eating and the 2020 election not being stolen.
You didn't hear Harris talk about her $50k tax break to new small businesses so they have some backup to fall on? The $6,000.00 tax break for children in the first few years? The $25K break for first time home buyers? Her stance on not letting Putin have Ukraine? Her claim that she would sign the bi-partisan border bill which Trump tanked? Her support of keeping and improving on our Affordable Care Act? There was more.
Honestly, I don't think you watched the debate, just some Youtuber's 5-10 minute view of the debate. Because that's a lot to miss, even if you watched passively.
Originally posted by RobtardI've not seen the whole debate, just bite sized clips from mainstream media channels. srug
Except that didn't happen. Trump literally lied non-stop and the mods only corrected him on a few claims like the cats/dogs eating and the 2020 election not being stolen.You didn't hear Harris talk about her $50k tax break to new small businesses so they have some backup to fall on? The $6,000.00 tax break for children in the first few years? The $25K break for first time home buyers? Her stance on not letting Putin have Ukraine? Her claim that she would sign the bi-partisan border bill which Trump tanked? Her support of keeping and improving on our Affordable Care Act? There was more.
Honestly, I don't think you watched the debate, just some Youtuber's 5-10 minute view of the debate. Because that's a lot to miss, even if you watched passively.
If she said all of those things, then those are some good policies, imo. However, the Russia/Ukraine thing is wishful thinking in my ignorant opinion. It's been going on for like a decade now.
Originally posted by RobtardIn the UK only the poor people and those with single parents get free school meals. Also, we used to get free milk, but Thatcher stopped that, so everyone just stole milk shake from thet local shop.
Clearly it's pronounced 'Khmer-Rouge-Laah', as she supports giving free lunches to school children and everyone knows that's socialist-communism. When science has proven that school kids don't need food, just the Ten Commandments for sustenance.
Remember, the reason you can't give out school lunches is, what if some kid whose parents can actually afford their lunch, gets a free lunch instead? The best thing to do is to give lunches to no one, leave the poor kids hungry, and that way, some slightly more wealthy hungry kid won't get free lunches either.
Originally posted by truejediOr the poor kids will find a rich kid they can beat up.
Remember, the reason you can't give out school lunches is, what if some kid whose parents can actually afford their lunch, gets a free lunch instead? The best thing to do is to give lunches to no one, leave the poor kids hungry, and that way, some slightly more wealthy hungry kid won't get free lunches either.
https://www.270towin.com/maps/1VjvN
I actually agree there is no likely scenario where Harris loses PA and wins the election.
Originally posted by truejedi
https://www.270towin.com/maps/1VjvNI actually agree there is no likely scenario where Harris loses PA and wins the election.
No, there is no scenario in which Trump loses Pennsylvania, and wins the election. Harris has other paths forward.
Originally posted by Adam_PoEIf Pennsylvania goes to Harris, it'll be 269 each, and Trump holds more states, so Trump wins.
No, there is no scenario in which Trump loses Pennsylvania, and wins the election. Harris has other paths forward.
If Trump focuses on Harris' unironic appease to trans people, he's won.
Originally posted by FalconPaunch!
If Pennsylvania goes to Harris, it'll be 269 each, and Trump holds more states, so Trump wins.If Trump focuses on Harris' unironic appease to trans people, he's won.
I've got it at 270-268. Nebraska has split electoral votes.
Adam: perhaps, but it seems to me that without PA, she needs multiple states that she is less likely to win than PA, so it's kinda PA or bust for both of them.
Originally posted by Bashar TegWell we've got a communist Labour government in, so more free money for me, I guess.
KMC has taught me that the most devout and loyal fascists are the same people who would be first on the fascist menu of "get things done".BUT I WAS ON YOUR SIDE!!!! YOU CANT GET RID OF ME FIRST!? THAT'S NOT FAIR!! REEEEEEE *gas*
As for Pennsylvania, Biden was born there, but now I think he can barely visit there.