You'd think tax cuts for corporations NOT creating jobs over and over and over again would make people realise that cutting taxes for corporations doesn't create jobs.
Apparently not.
Who remembers that 2017 meeting with 100 CEOs where they were asked if they would use their Trump tax cut to invest and create jobs and 2 of them put their hands up and the rest of them said the money would go to executive pay and shareholder profits?
Originally posted by jaden_2.0I didn't say they'd do it, I said they'd be in the best position. Small businesses have a lot more risk than big businesses.
You'd think tax cuts for corporations NOT creating jobs over and over and over again would make people realise that cutting taxes for corporations doesn't create jobs.Apparently not.
Who remembers that 2017 meeting with 100 CEOs where they were asked if they would use their Trump tax cut to invest and create jobs and 2 of them put their hands up and the rest of them said the money would go to executive pay and shareholder profits?
Shareholder profits means more investment in Apple products and Amazon services, which is a pretty big deal in the modern era.
By increasing corporate tax, shareholders are going to want the profits from somewhere, which means an increase in sales tax, hurting the middle and working classes, the unemployable, the homeless, and even illegal immigrants.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
You'd think tax cuts for corporations NOT creating jobs over and over and over again would make people realise that cutting taxes for corporations doesn't create jobs.Apparently not.
Who remembers that 2017 meeting with 100 CEOs where they were asked if they would use their Trump tax cut to invest and create jobs and 2 of them put their hands up and the rest of them said the money would go to executive pay and shareholder profits?
It's amusing just how easy they're capable of convincing the Rightist pleb masses that they'll feel that "trickle down", eventually, they swear, promise it's not urine you're feeling.
It's also amusing that some of the poorest people, ones that rely on public handouts to literally not be dead in a gutter, still push their agenda. We've had at least two in KMC like this. Maybe three, as I'm pretty sure that ethnorgr/star428 guy was on the dole too.
Originally posted by RobtardIt's hilarious you don't understand that these elitist ****ers will raise prices the second they get taxed and everyone suffers.
It's amusing just how easy they're capable of convincing the Rightist pleb masses that they'll feel that "trickle down", eventually, they swear, promise it's not urine you're feeling.It's also amusing that some of the poorest people, ones that rely on public handouts to literally not be dead in a gutter, still push their agenda. We've had at least two in KMC like this. Maybe three, as I'm pretty sure that ethnorgr/star428 guy was on the dole too.
Bow down to your masters. I rebelled, their only solution was to call me crazy to cover their own asses.
Originally posted by Psychotron
No, he's a politician. That's expected.
So "both sides" equalization coping tactics, it's a favorite of Rightist who get brief moments of lucidity and realize they voted against their own best interest
And yes, Democrats are shit, but they're FAR less likely to screw the middle/working class over so the wealthiest people can have just a little but more. eg See Harris' proposed tax cuts to the mddle.
Originally posted by FalconPaunch!
Allow me to reiterate.*inhale*
They Spend Their Profits On Investments As Well As Leisure, Dickwad. 😐
Deary me
Let me explain it again.
In 2017 the WSJ held a meeting of CEOs and they were asked for a show of hands on would they use their Trump tax cuts to invest.
2 of them put their hands up.
When asked why there weren't more putting their hands up they said the cuts would be used to increase "shareholder value".
They didn't invest in R&D. They didn't use it to create jobs. They used it to increase shareholder profits.
Not sure why this is so difficult for you.