Originally posted by Robtard
I stopped reading there because you're lying again and I sensed you went on yet another diatribe which you're known to do. I said something that was true and you tried to turn it around on me, hence the "no you!" reply. Deal with it.
Her entire outrage is fake. By her own admission, she "felt like being controversial," and pretended she was a cross-dresser, so when a liberal poster referred to her as a cross-dresser instead of a transgender woman, she went, "A-ha! I am actually a transgender woman, and you just misgendered me, transphobe!" Everyone saw through her little "experiment," so she keeps doubling and tripling down on the transphobia accusation, and anyone who will not reflexively condemn the person she accused.
She extends that guilt-by-association to people who hold the same position as a transphobe on a totally unrelated issue, but does not apply that same reasoning to her holding the same position as a bigots, racists, and transphobes about other totally unrelated issues. I might share anti-racist position with XYZ for example, but I would still call him out on his transphobia. Meanwhile, Scribble not only does not call Surtur out for his transphobia, but also defends his racism, because friends. Totally pathetic.
Originally posted by Adam_PoEWhat? That's about the Bash stuff that we all put aside ages ago, you doof. Also that wasn't what happened either, if it did then please do find an example - slander is a terrible look just to 'win' this, Adam.
Her entire outrage is fake. By her own admission, she "felt like being controversial," and pretended she was a cross-dresser, so when a liberal poster referred to her as a cross-dresser instead of a transgender woman, she went, "A-ha! I am actually a transgender woman, and you just misgendered me, transphobe!" Everyone saw through her little "experiment," so she keeps doubling and tripling down on the transphobia accusation, and anyone who will not reflexively condemn the person she accused.She extends that guilt-by-association to people who hold the same position as a transphobe on a totally unrelated issue, but does not apply that same reasoning to her holding the same position as a bigots, racists, and transphobes about other totally unrelated issues. I might share anti-racist position with XYZ for example, but I would still call him out on his transphobia. Meanwhile, Scribble not only does not call Surtur out for his transphobia, but also defends his racism, because friends. Totally pathetic.
I've called Surtur out on transphobia plenty of times, and I called out his joke as racist literally minutes ago. Never seen you admonish xyz for transphobia even once, other than referring to his repeated dehumanisation of trans people as a 'microaggression', and that wasn't even directed at him.
Why not address this to me, why this weird back and forth with Rob? I'm right here and more than ready to counter your nonsense.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Her entire outrage is fake. By her own admission, she "felt like being controversial," and pretended she was a cross-dresser, so when a liberal poster referred to her as a cross-dresser instead of a transgender woman, she went, "A-ha! I am actually a transgender woman, and you just misgendered me, transphobe!" Everyone saw through her little "experiment," so she keeps doubling and tripling down on the transphobia accusation, and anyone who will not reflexively condemn the person she accused.She extends that guilt-by-association to people who hold the same position as a transphobe on a totally unrelated issue, but does not apply that same reasoning to her holding the same position as a bigots, racists, and transphobes about other totally unrelated issues. I might share anti-racist position with XYZ for example, but I would still call him out on his transphobia. Meanwhile, Scribble not only does not call Surtur out for his transphobia, but also defends his racism, because friends. Totally pathetic.
That's just sad.
Originally posted by Scribblecall surtur out for his ******* racism
What? That's about the Bash stuff that we all put aside ages ago, you doof. Also that wasn't what happened either, if it did then please do find an example - slander is a terrible look just to 'win' this, Adam.I've called Surtur out on transphobia plenty of times, and I called out his joke as racist literally minutes ago. Never seen you admonish xyz for transphobia even once, other than referring to his repeated dehumanisation of trans people as a 'microaggression', and that wasn't even directed at him.
Why not address this to me, why this weird back and forth with Rob? I'm right here and more than ready to counter your nonsense.
Originally posted by BlakemoreWow, great stuff, let's hear some more. I'm sure Adam and Rob will totally take issue with this nasty and vindictive statement.
trans people don't look like normal people you dumb ****!
I'll add this, too, just to show you guys a pattern in xyz's behaviour:
Originally posted by Scribble
But I'm not getting surgery.Your issue is with the very existence of transgender people.
Originally posted by BlakemoreIn this example, Blakemore states very clearly that he has an issue with the very existence of trans people because they are 'fake' and he finds them unattractive.
because they look about as real and appealing as Victoria Beckham's t its.