Could someone please explain to me who the heck is throwing money at Onlyfans and Twitch and junk?
I mean, anyone who gets a thrill out of some girl wearing body paint or sitting in a hot tub probably doesn't have much experience with women. And while that would include many older incels in addition to 18-20 somethings looking for a cheap thrill, neither of those groups generally have a lot of money. So where is the money coming from??
Who's throwing around money at this? Pimps and drug dealers? Republican senators? (But don't they have Epstein Island?)
Originally posted by cdtmYouTube video
Could someone please explain to me who the heck is throwing money at Onlyfans and Twitch and junk?I mean, anyone who gets a thrill out of some girl wearing body paint or sitting in a hot tub probably doesn't have much experience with women. And while that would include many older incels in addition to 18-20 somethings looking for a cheap thrill, neither of those groups generally have a lot of money. So where is the money coming from??
Who's throwing around money at this? Pimps and drug dealers? Republican senators? (But don't they have Epstein Island?)
Originally posted by Nuke Nixon
You think this is a new money-laundering scam? Mafia, Cartels, maybe one of the alphabet agencies?
I dunno, it gets really hard to trace money in these things.
Joe Exotic is another one. Look into his money and everything is about what he makes from exhibiting big cats. But no one ever talks about how he was able to afford to collect the animals before that. Or afford to buy the land, pens, food and such..
I mean, aren't tigers super expensive to buy and care for? Isn't land expensive?
They say he had a meth addiction, so maybe he made a fortune peddling meth, ala Walter White?
Speaking of woman, I keep seeing middle aged white women arguing over stupid stuff. This one lady harassed a local store owner who's book and card shop has been in the community for decades over a piece of political memorabilia she found offensive. The store owner calmly explained he had to try and move the product, but she wouldn't have it.
Lot of Karen's out there.
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!😂
Originally posted by Blakemore
Wiki fked up
Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. Because it can be edited by anyone at any time, any information it contains at a particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. Biographies of living persons, subjects that happen to be in the news, and politically or culturally contentious topics are especially vulnerable to these issues. Edits on Wikipedia that are in error are usually fixed after some time. However, because Wikipedia is a volunteer-run project, it cannot constantly monitor every contribution. There are many errors that remain unnoticed for hours, days, weeks, months, or even years. Therefore, Wikipedia should not be considered a definitive source in and of itself.
And my irony quota for the day:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Sanger
Lawrence Mark Sanger (/ˈsæŋər/;[1] born July 16, 1968) is an American Internet project developer and philosopher who co-founded the online encyclopedia Wikipedia along with Jimmy Wales, for which he coined the name and wrote much of its original governing policy. Sanger has worked on other online encyclopedias such as Nupedia, Citizendium, and Everipedia.Larry Sanger
A bespectacled balding man in a blue shirt with the collar unbuttoned looks straight at the viewer.
Sanger in July 2006
Born
Lawrence Mark Sanger
July 16, 1968 (age 52)
Bellevue, Washington, U.S.
Education
Reed College (BA)
Ohio State University (MA, PhD)
Occupation
Internet project developer
Known for
Co-founding Wikipedia and founding Citizendium
Website
LarrySanger.org
While studying at college, Sanger developed an interest in using the Internet for educational purposes and joined the online encyclopedia Nupedia as editor-in-chief in 2000. Disappointed with the slow progress of Nupedia, Sanger proposed using a wiki to solicit and receive articles to put through Nupedia's peer-review process; this change led to the development and launch of Wikipedia in 2001. Sanger served as Wikipedia's community leader in Wikipedia's early stages but became increasingly disillusioned with the project and left it in 2002. Sanger's status as a co-founder of Wikipedia has been questioned by fellow co-founder Jimmy Wales but is generally accepted.Since Sanger's departure from Wikipedia, he has been critical of the project, describing it in 2007 as being "broken beyond repair".[2] He has argued that despite its merits, Wikipedia lacks credibility due to a lack of respect for expertise and authority. He has also criticized Wikipedia for what he perceives as a leftist and liberal ideological bias in its articles.
Opinions please:
In the boxing anime/manga Hajime No Ippo, there is a amateur world champion from Russia named Volg Zangief, who was one of the toughest opponents of the series. The main character Ippo only beat him by a hair before passing into a coma, while the main rival to the MC defeated him by a point win resulting from a slip that the (potentially crooked) referee called as a down. Volg was so popular, the manga writer Morikawa claimed he was intentionally using a fighting style he wasn't comfortable with to gain popularity in Japan, and could have easily defeated every major character in the series with his natural style.
So I ask you, does this make ANY sense at all? Does handicapping yourself for popularity when defeat means deportation and the end of your boxing career make any sense?
I don't believe it does. Yet Volgs many fans accept it as fact that none of his losses are legitimate, and he is the best in the series by default. (This is before he gained a world title, which would make him the best as he won it under adverse conditions like no prep time, a crooked ref, a hostile arena in America..)