Originally posted by Newjakyoure talking shit again.
Technically we all start off as females in terms of how we are despite what our chromosomes are.At some point if you're born with the genetics to become male then the male organs will start develop. This isn't an exact process so sometimes the male parts will start to form later and this can have impact on how that person will develop.
I don't the exact mechanisms behind it but this can lead to different levels of hormones within the body.
Originally posted by Blakemoretbh, testosterone levels, gene expression and brain chemistry may all be better descriptors of gender than anatomy
Stance on what? I understand females as having wombs, a fetus is already established as what gender it is. Before that, it’s a collection of undeveloped cells.
I don't know but you're fighting against learning something basic. Generally people don't do that unless they're afraid of what information means to them.
Your understanding is wrong in that case.
The fact you think female only equates to having a womb shows that. After all there are women born without uteruses and no ability to reproduce.
The fact we all start developing as female is not that weird either. After all it explains why we all develop nipples even though they are practically useless on men. It also explains why some men are capable of lactating.
It's also why there are conditions where men can be born with a uterus while still having the normal pair of male chromosomes and external male genitalia.
I think the general time frame, from what I read, for when men make the switch and stop developing more female characteristics is around the 2 month mark. Don't quote me on that one though.
Originally posted by Newjakwhich is why I asked what your definition of a female was.
I don't know but you're fighting against learning something basic. Generally people don't do that unless they're afraid of what information means to them.Your understanding is wrong in that case.
The fact you think female only equates to having a womb shows that. After all there are women born without uteruses and no ability to reproduce.
The fact we all start developing as female is not that weird either. After all it explains why we all develop nipples even though they are practically useless on men. It also explains why some men are capable of lactating.
It's also why there are conditions where men can be born with a uterus while still having the normal pair of male chromosomes and external male genitalia.
I think the general time frame, from what I read, for when men make the switch and stop developing more female characteristics is around the 2 month mark. Don't quote me on that one though.
Originally posted by BlakemoreAnd that is an irrelevant question to the scientific process of fetus growth.
which is why I asked what your definition of a female was.
It doesn't matter what my or your personal definition is of female. It's about the scientific definition of it which you clearly don't know and refuse to actually go educate yourself on.
Originally posted by Newjakcan you tell me what it is?
And that is an irrelevant question to the scientific process of fetus growth.It doesn't matter what my or your personal definition is of female. It's about the scientific definition of it which you clearly don't know and refuse to actually go educate yourself on.
Originally posted by Blakemore
can you tell me what it is?
https://www.medicinenet.com/female/definition.htm
It's a complicated thing that involves multiple levels.
It also doesn't change the development process where we all start off going down the female development path and then it gets switched later.
Originally posted by Newjakthat source looked like nonsense to me.
https://www.medicinenet.com/female/definition.htmIt's a complicated thing that involves multiple levels.
It also doesn't change the development process where we all start off going down the female development path and then it gets switched later.
Originally posted by Blakemore😂 😆 😂 😆
that source looked like nonsense to me.
Of course it does to you because it conflicts with your personal definition of 'female'
Also you do understand as we better understand things previous definitions may no longer be accurate right?
Like seriously it doesn't matter what you want to believe. At this point you're just ignoring the basic principle that we all start off down the female development path until certain genes change that path for some of us to be male. And how when that switch gets flipped can have dramatic impacts on how a fetus develops.
I've already given dozens of examples of abnormal development that wouldn't fit neatly into your definition of female.
And guess what no amount of definition hoping is going to change that. Like it's not worth me giving you more of my time if you're going to be this dense for no reason.
🙄