The GDF Septic Tank (Official Off Topic)

Started by cdtm1,415 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
You've literally downplayed and defended the Jan 6th attackers...

The capitol police who were fighting for their lives disagree with your assessment that is was just very small mob of attackers.

You're lying again. I've never defended burning and looting, as just noted, that shits on your cause. Plus it's illegal.

If capital police were attacked, I would not question them using lethal response.

It's the idea of the ENTIRE group being insurrectionists.

Were they heavily armed? Did they have tanks? What did they expect to enact their coup with, a bag of zip ties?

Originally posted by Dhhdjd
you're confused

Says the sock.

Originally posted by cdtm
If capital police were attacked, I would not question them using lethal response.

It's the idea of the ENTIRE group being insurrectionists.

Were they heavily armed? Did they have tanks? What did they expect to enact their coup with, a bag of zip ties?

Yet you've defended the domestic terrorist Ashli Babbitt via shit tactics...

No one said "every single Trumper there", so your strawman argument is just that, but there was a lot of them both inside and outside.

Guns, clubs, chemical sprays. But sure, they didn't have a tank so "meh". Their actions being poorly thought out because they're stupid is no excuse. That's like saying a thief isn't responsible because they were ultimately too stupid to carry out the theft properly and got caught. It's still a crime.

Originally posted by cdtm
It's the idea of the ENTIRE group being insurrectionists.

Like when Methneo accuses all Muslims of being homophobic, or when Klaw says all women are whore-y gold diggers?

Weirdly, my spellcheck didn't flag whore-y... Kind of thrown me that.

Originally posted by samhain
Like when Methneo accuses all Muslims of being homophobic, or when Klaw says all women are whore-y gold diggers?

Weirdly, my spellcheck didn't flag whore-y... Kind of thrown me that.

Yeah, and I disagree with that too.

I actually argued the case on another board against a Canadian, of all people. Not even sure if he was liberal or conservative, he tended to argue against a board hard libertarian on most issues (The kind of libertarian who argues child protective services had no business taking a kid from parents who refused a medical procedure to cure brain cancer that had a 95-99 percent survival rate, as happened once)

Originally posted by cdtm
Yeah, and I disagree with that too.

I actually argued the case on another board against a Canadian, of all people. Not even sure if he was liberal or conservative, he tended to argue against a board hard libertarian on most issues (The kind of libertarian who argues child protective services had no business taking a kid from parents who refused a medical procedure to cure brain cancer that had a 95-99 percent survival rate, as happened once)

I'm the most hardcore libertarian I've ever met and that dude's view is autistic as hell. The state is obviously incompetent, but there's an order of things to worry about.

Our national debt, which facilitates war, should obviously come before attacking things like welfare or cps.

But at the same time adoption and foster care both have very high rates of child abuse.

I'd argue that in a free market you wouldn't have this type of dysgenic stuff because people would be held accountable for their actions.
For example, if a mom wants to whore around and get single mom'd then she'd have to make that work instead of being a leech.

In the case of the brain cancer kid I'm not sure why the rest of his family didn't try to persuade the parents.

Democrats in 2016: Trump is too old and senile
Democrats in 2020: Biden is not too old and senile
Me in 2016 and 2020: This is going to be entertaining.

Originally posted by Robtard
You've literally downplayed and defended the Jan 6th attackers...

The capitol police who were fighting for their lives disagree with your assessment that is was just very small mob of attackers.

You're lying again. I've never defended burning and looting, as just noted, that shits on your cause. Plus it's illegal.

👆 This!

Originally posted by Blakemore
Democrats in 2016: Trump is too old and senile
Democrats in 2020: Biden is not too old and senile
Me in 2016 and 2020: This is going to be entertaining.

Who said that in 2016? He was just a piece is shit.

Though we do need age limits both ways. Say 35-70

Originally posted by Robtard
Who said that in 2016? He was just a piece is shit.

Though we do need age limits both ways. Say 35-70

I was hoping I'd get thumbs ups from Klaw and eThneo, but I guess even saying things they like won't even get their approval.

I'm actually glad I trigger them so much. I've become Robtard tier. 🙂

Originally posted by Blakemore
I was hoping I'd get thumbs ups from Klaw and eThneo, but I guess even saying things they like won't even get their approval.

I'm actually glad I trigger them so much. I've become Robtard tier. 🙂

you are on fire at the moment mate 👆

I haven't reach your level, but I'm getting there. I'm now getting mentioned even when I'm not even online!

Originally posted by Blakemore
I was hoping I'd get thumbs ups from Klaw and eThneo, but I guess even saying things they like won't even get their approval.

I'm actually glad I trigger them so much. I've become Robtard tier. 🙂

No one is triggered by your alcoholic ass.

Originally posted by Blakemore
I haven't reach your level, but I'm getting there. I'm now getting mentioned even when I'm not even online!
You will surpass me young padewan!

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
You will surpass me young padewan!
O B 1 died though. 🙁

Originally posted by samhain
Like when Methneo accuses all Muslims of being homophobic, or when Klaw says all women are whore-y gold diggers?

Weirdly, my spellcheck didn't flag whore-y... Kind of thrown me that.

I've never said that, liar.

Originally posted by Klaw
No one is triggered by your alcoholic ass.

Yeah, wittle drunkard blakey is a joke. It's fun making fun of him but he triggers no one lol.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
I'm the most hardcore libertarian I've ever met and that dude's view is autistic as hell. The state is obviously incompetent, but there's an order of things to worry about.

Our national debt, which facilitates war, should obviously come before attacking things like welfare or cps.

But at the same time adoption and foster care both have very high rates of child abuse.

I'd argue that in a free market you wouldn't have this type of dysgenic stuff because people would be held accountable for their actions.
For example, if a mom wants to whore around and get single mom'd then she'd have to make that work instead of being a leech.

In the case of the brain cancer kid I'm not sure why the rest of his family didn't try to persuade the parents.

His main thing was the idea that if mandates exist, then there is no defense against an evil government who uses mandates for purges.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/three-men-win-million-euro-prize-posed-as-female-2021-10%3famp

HOME INTERNATIONAL
A renowned female crime novelist who won a million-euro prize in Spain turned out to be three middle-aged men
Francis Agustin Oct 17, 2021, 12:18 PM

carmen mola planeta awards
The writer Carmen Mola, is a pseudonym of the writers Jorge Diaz, Agustin Martinez and Antonio Mercero. Kike Rincon/Europa Press/Getty Images
Best-selling Spanish crime author Carmen Mola was revealed to be three men after they accepted a coveted literary award.
Mola's work often features strong female protagonists and has been hailed as a "must-read" by and for women.
The trio of writers decided to use the name without considering the implications of writing under a female name.
Like a plot twist straight out of a novel, the identity of a respected female crime author was revealed – and it turns out "she" was three men.

Speculation on the identity of one of Spain's most prominent crime thriller writers, who wrote under the name Carmen Mola, ended on Friday when three men rose to accept the 2021 Premio Planeta literary prize — worth one million-euros — for Mola's currently unreleased work "The Beast."

Jorge Díaz, Agustín Martínez, and Antonio Mercero are writers in their own right, having penned numerous scripts for television between them. They decided to write under the pseudonym for no particular reason and without consideration of the name's gender.

"Carmen Mola is not, like all the lies we've been telling, a university professor," Díaz said shortly after accepting the Planeta prize, according to the Financial Times. "We are three friends who one day four years ago decided to combine our talent to tell a story."

Ad
Mola, which the trio represented as a university professor and mother of three who wrote gritty crime drama on her off-time, has been praised for "her" depiction of strong female protagonists, with her latest award-winning work focusing on the investigation of child murders in nineteenth-century Spain.

Mola's other works have also garnered acclaim, like "La Novia Gitana," which has been translated into 11 languages and will be developed into a television series. Castille-La Mancha, a branch of Spain's Women's Institute, included her book "La Nena" in a list of 50 feminist titles that help readers "understand the reality and experiences of women."

In the past, women have gone to publish works under male pseudonyms to protect their identity and dodge social biases.

"I don't know if a female pseudonym would sell more than a male one, I don't have the faintest idea, but I doubt it," Mercero told Spain's El País newspaper. "We didn't hide behind a woman, we hid behind a name."

Meanwhile, critics of the trio's actions point out the exploitative nature underlying the three men's deception.

"Beyond the use of a female pseudonym, these guys have been answering interviews for years," tweeted former Head of the Women's Institute Beatriz Gimeno. "It is not only the name, it is the fake profile with which it has taken readers and journalists. They are scammers."

"It hasn't escaped anyone's notice that the idea of a university professor and mother of three who taught algebra classes in the morning then wrote ultraviolent, macabre novels in scraps of free time in the afternoon made for a great marketing operation," reporter Leticia Blanco wrote for Spain's El Mundo newspaper.

"No particular reason" my eye. Like they'd admit to the reason.

The reason is because women as a group are one of the most desireable demographics to sell to. Oprah made her fame and fortune off of women.

Very clever of them to invent a female pseudonym. I wonder if all three are equals in the venture, or if one of them is more of a "hanger on" riding the other two's coat tails, three usually having an odd man out and all..

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
I've never said that, liar.

It's exactly the kind of scummy thing a POS like you would say though, which is why I put it up. Really you could swap what I said with any of your shitty views and my point remains the same.

I noticed you said that you never said those words but you offer no denial that you think this way.