Can someone make an image of this?
"I think you're being too harsh to immigrants and transgenders"
YOU GUYS ARE TOO FAR ON THE LEFT
"I think you're being too harsh on non-whites and homosexuals"
YOU GUYS ARE TOO FAR ON THE LEFT
"I think you're being too harsh on non-anglos and non-christians"
YOU GUYS ARE TOO FAR ON THE LEFT
"Maybe we should be a non-violent klan?"
*lynched*
Originally posted by samhain
Genuinely not surprised by this, I'm already prepping my media statements for after you massacre a women's book club or burn down a synagogue.
Everyone should read it. Gives insight into his motivation, and frankly many of hie observations are on point.
For example, franchises used personality tests to weed out creative thinkers. Modern industrial societies reward obedience and punish autonomy.
Lack of autonomy leads to psychological issues.
He sources everything he claims. The man was a psychopath, but he was also an intellect and scholar.
Originally posted by BlakemoreThought I'd add at the end, "we're an open-minded and centrist klan"
Can someone make an image of this?"I think you're being too harsh to immigrants and transgenders"
YOU GUYS ARE TOO FAR ON THE LEFT"I think you're being too harsh on non-whites and homosexuals"
YOU GUYS ARE TOO FAR ON THE LEFT"I think you're being too harsh on non-anglos and non-christians"
YOU GUYS ARE TOO FAR ON THE LEFT"Maybe we should be a non-violent klan?"
*lynched*
To Blake:
Just released study shows risk of myocarditis following mRNA vaccination is higher than the risk from Covid infection
No Commentson Just released study shows risk of myocarditis following mRNA vaccination is higher than the risk from Covid infectionPosted in Guy HatchardBy Webmaster FreeNZPosted on 27/12/2021Tagged #vaccine, covid, mrna
New study released 25 December shows incidence of Myocarditis among under 40 mRNA vaccinated males is worse than that induced by Covid itself.Definitive preprint study of 25 December 2021 analysing data from 42,000,000 cases in the UK finds that the risk of developing myocarditis among young males after mRNA vaccination is greater than the risk of developing myocarditis after covid infection. The risk of myocarditis is further elevated following a Pfizer booster shot. This finding is contrary to the narrative that is being presented by the NZ media and by the Ministry of Health. It shows that the present policy of vaccination for individuals up to 40 is flawed from a safety perspective.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.23.21268276v1.full.pdf
Respected US cancer researcher Vinay Prasad, who usually presents a pro-vaccination stance, blogs:“These findings clearly dispel the misinformation online: Yes, sorry to break it to you, vaccines can have risks of myocarditis EXCEEDING risks of myocarditis from infection. Please stop saying otherwise.”
He further comments:
Perhaps that is why Marion Gruber and Phil Krause, the Director and Deputy Director of vaccine products at FDA, have just resigned: they wanted no part of the flawed US vaccination policy which is failing to minimise harms.
Vinay Prasad further claims that data shows it is highly likely that the 16-24 age group will have an even higher risk.
This preprint is supported by Health Data Research UK and was published in response to scientific discussions arising from a study published on December 14 in the prestigious Nature Medicine.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01630-0.pdf
The preprint clarifies and quantifies the conclusions reached in this paper which are also critical of vaccination policies.It is very important at this point that the NZ media take note of the evolving science on mRNA vaccine safety. The NZ government is on the brink of offering vaccination to 5-11 year olds for whom there is insufficient safety data and is also continuing with an advertising campaign which informs the public there is no risk from vaccination. It is impossible to maintain this public narrative with any degree of honesty. It is now up to the NZ media to step up to the plate and present a critical scientific perspective in its reporting rather than the uncritical stance it has taken so far. The health of our young people is at issue.
The December 15 private letter to DHBs from Dr Ashley Bloomfield admitting a significant risk of myocarditis and pericarditis shows that the government is aware of risks, but the current NZ vaccination advertising and mandate policies have not caught up with the evolving scientific findings. The NZ government is not offering the ‘informed medical consent’ required by the NZ Bill of Rights.
Guy Hatchard PhD was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID, he has expertise in the interpretation of data
This isn't about "political point scoring". It's about the truth.
As in, authorities are suppressing it in the name of "vaccine hesitancy", such as this study here.
That, or they protect Big Pharma profit margins.
Originally posted by cdtm
To Blake:This isn't about "political point scoring". It's about the truth.
As in, authorities are suppressing it in the name of "vaccine hesitancy", such as this study here.
That, or they protect Big Pharma profit margins.
Literally on the front page of the site they source:
Caution: Preprints are preliminary reports of work that have not been certified by peer review. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Originally posted by cdtm
To Blake:This isn't about "political point scoring". It's about the truth.
As in, authorities are suppressing it in the name of "vaccine hesitancy", such as this study here.
That, or they protect Big Pharma profit margins.
It's almost like you didn't actually read the study and just took someone else's politically motivated and incorrect interpretation of it at face value.
Originally posted by Stringer
I dont understand how people agreeing with each other would get the covid thread closed. Its an echo chamber in here except maybe for that idiot cbtb4 or whatever his name is. Think its because those two mods are conservative, imo. One of them is also a homosexual which I think is awesome. Oh well
it's f*cking ridiculous actually
President Joe Biden on Thursday warned his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin of a tough US response to any invasion of Ukraine
WHY DO WE CARE??!
Let them have Ukraine. It has literally nothing to do with us.
Originally posted by cdtm
Vinay Prasad is politically motivated?I mean, he's the expert here. Not me, and I doubt you.
Well apparently neither of you can read. So misinterpretation of scientific papers is either willful based on some non-scientific factor. Which in your case is likely the inability to read it. And in his case is likely some other motivation.
Given that both the links you posted state the opposite of what you claim they say.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0Cdtm is well aware of the lies he is propagating. The pretense he hides his gaslighting behind is laughable.
Well apparently neither of you can read. So misinterpretation of scientific papers is either willful based on some non-scientific factor. Which in your case is likely the inability to read it. And in his case is likely some other motivation.Given that both the links you posted state the opposite of what you claim they say.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Well apparently neither of you can read. So misinterpretation of scientific papers is either willful based on some non-scientific factor. Which in your case is likely the inability to read it. And in his case is likely some other motivation.Given that both the links you posted state the opposite of what you claim they say.
Or maybe you're cherry picking! 😛
We got away from the original Blake post anyways, he accused me of playing political points gathering with lives on the line. But all I did was post a video that compared an article from 2021 that called speculation about Wuhan labs leaking a virus is conspiracy theory and racist, with the very same website publishing an article a year later that claims speculation on Wuhan labs leaking a virus is valid, and always was.
Which is kind of a mixed message to make. And it was a message widely spread in media, where any speculations about the origin of the virus were unfounded racism. One may rightfully be wary whether they think conspiracy theory is defined by who believes what, and not what is believed, e.g. Wuhan speculation is conspiracy theory because the president or some health department says it is, until they change their minds and suddenly it's valid concerns.
But even that is beside the point of Blake's comment, as no one is dying over speculation about whether Wuhan leaked a virus from a lab or not.
Originally posted by cdtmdurmask
Or maybe you're cherry picking! 😛We got away from the original Blake post anyways, he accused me of playing political points gathering with lives on the line. But all I did was post a video that compared an article from 2021 that called speculation about Wuhan labs leaking a virus is conspiracy theory and racist, with the very same website publishing an article a year later that claims speculation on Wuhan labs leaking a virus is valid, and always was.
Which is kind of a mixed message to make. One may rightfully be wary whether they think conspiracy theory is defined by who believes what, and not what is believed, e.g. Wuhan speculation is conspiracy theory because the president or some health department says it is, until they change their minds and suddenly it's valid concerns.
But even that is beside the point of Blake's comment, as no one is dying over speculation about whether Wuhan leaked a virus from a lab or not.