Should social media be regulated?

Originally posted by Robtard
Because Jesus would have baked that gay couple a cake if he were a skilled baker instead of a carpenter and it would have been a fabulous cake. Jesus would have attended the wedding as well, if invited.

No, Jesus would 100% not have baked the cake.

He would have hugged them, the two gay men would have broken down crying fully knowing they were sinning by giving into their wickedness, then Jesus wold have forgiven them, and He would tell them to go forth and sin no more.

Do you even "bible", bro?

I've said it before but why would you refuse to bake cakes for gay people, imagine how much business you're losing out on, from what I hear gay men love the cake.

Misinformation misleads. That's why we have defamation laws, which do far more to limit free speech than cancel culture ever could. Statistics, half truths, emotion and rhetoric, anecdotes, lies and selective use of facts can mislead even intelligent people into believing things that are harmful to themselves and others. We see it on this forum with our very own Arthur C Clarke, DDM and his Science Fiction stories.

As long as a black baker would have to bake a cake for a guy in klan outfit, okay. I'd be okay with forcing the guy to bake cake for gays.

But if he has to do something he doesn't believe in, so does everybody else. And no hiding behind "muh protected classes" those need to be done away with if we're really gonna ride this train.

Also yes, it now def needs to be regulated:

Originally posted by Surtur
Hmm.

https://twitter.com/Hammer_Of_Glass/status/1276198714072338432

Originally posted by Surtur
As long as a black baker would have to bake a cake for a guy in klan outfit, okay. I'd be okay with forcing the guy to bake cake for gays.

But if he has to do something he doesn't believe in, so does everybody else. And no hiding behind "muh protected classes" those need to be done away with if we're really gonna ride this train.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Yeah, and you obviously don't see any of whats wrong in your analogy. 🙂

You don't get to have your cake and it too, pun intended 🙂

If that baker needs to be forced to serve people even though it really makes him uncomfortable, we can't be racist and not include minorities in on that fun.

Originally posted by Surtur
You don't get to have your cake and it too, pun intended 🙂

If that baker needs to be forced to serve people even though it really makes him uncomfortable, we can't be racist and not include minorities in on that fun.

Neat, I assume you were consistent and agreed either the baker shouldn't be forced to bake it or everyone in any situation should be forced to do it.

So Muslims need to make cakes for jews even if they want Muhammad on the cake.

I like this. Let's do that.

You're failing to deal with the concept of accountability in your generalisation and comparing someone's sexual proclivities to someone who is sending a message that he is a Nazi. Are you saying gays and Nazi's should be equally accepted Surt?

I brought up muslims too.

If the gay baker should be forced to do something that makes him uncomfy due to religion, defend why a muslim shouldn't be forced to make a muhammad cake.

Go for it.

Originally posted by Surtur
I brought up muslims too.

If the gay baker should be forced to do something that makes him uncomfy due to religion, defend why a muslim shouldn't be forced to make a muhammad cake.

Go for it.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
to be honest i think most bakers would make a mohummad cake. Do you have an example where one wasn't made? In the UK they would be everywhere except Northern Ireland and the Orange Men are nutty, that's Orange Men, not Orange Man although he is nutty too.

And if one refused to bake one he should be forced, correct?

Note: do not ask me again if this has happened. It is a hypothetical, do not embarrass yourself further by acting like you don't know this.

Originally posted by Surtur
And if one refused to bake one he should be forced, correct?

Note: do not ask me again if this has happened. It is a hypothetical, do not embarrass yourself further by acting like you don't know this.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
i think most bakers would, i think religion except where people are radical is something people find generally easy to put aside. I have a Chrismas card every Christmas from a Muslim friend and I'm an atheist.

If a muslim baker refused to bake a cake with muhammad on it should he be forced yes or no?

Originally posted by Surtur
If a muslim baker refused to bake a cake with muhammad on it should he be forced yes or no?

Lol it's like you have some learning disability.

I'm comparing the devout Muslim who doesn't wanna bake something cuz it offends his faith to the devout Christian who doesn't wanna bake something cuz it offends his faith.

In my example with the Klan member the Klan guy was the buyer not the seller.

Anyways, so you just confirmed you agree the Christian baker should be free to refuse to bake cakes that he feels go against his religious beliefs, right?

I gotta say, I'm 50/50 on if you're gonna respond and actually say the muslim guys offense is somehow more legit.

I wanna say "no, he'd never be that dumb" but then...well, I also thought Trump would lose in 2016.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol it's like you have some learning disability.

I'm comparing the devout Muslim who doesn't wanna bake something cuz it offends his faith to the devout Christian who doesn't wanna bake something cuz it offends his faith.

In my example with the Klan member the Klan guy was the buyer not the seller.

Anyways, so you just confirmed you agree the Christian baker should be free to refuse to bake cakes that he feels go against his religious beliefs, right?

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Yes the Christian and Muslim are completely different in how serious their silly views should be taken to the Klansman who is nothing like a gay. I think I have it now. How about them apples or are the durian fruit?

Lmfao.

Why does this need to be spelled out: I'm comparing the instance of the gay guys wanting a cake from the christian to some random person wanting muslims to put muhammad on a cake.

Let the klan shit go, it's not a part of this hypothetical.

But since u agree the muslim can say "nah" you agree the christian can say "nah".

Good.