Should social media be regulated?

Started by Robtard12 pages

Originally posted by Surtur
As long as it was honest about its practices and bias.

Facebook isn't.

What's honest about about not baking a cake for two men but baking a cake for a man and woman and hiding behind religion as the reason?

How is FB not honest?

So yeah, u chose clownery.

Originally posted by Surtur
So yeah, u chose clownery.

So another dodge because you know answering the questions proves you wrong.

Originally posted by Robtard
What's honest about about not baking a cake for two men but baking a cake for a man and woman and hiding behind religion as the reason?

How is FB not honest?

I remembervthat ludicrous right wing thread! 👆

Originally posted by Robtard
So another dodge because you know answering the questions proves you wrong.

It honestly doesn't.

But you won't engage in good faith. It's clear.

So I'll just let you and whirly jerk each other off into infinity 👆

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
I remembervthat ludicrous right wing thread! 👆

I have a feeling frantic PMs are being spammed right now

Originally posted by Surtur
It honestly doesn't.

But you won't engage in good faith. It's clear.

So I'll just let you and whirly jerk each other off into infinity 👆

You're lying.

I asked you two show me how that baker is "honest", when he hide his bigotry against gay people under "but my religion" as the reason to refuse service. You dodged.

I asked you why you think FB isn't honest. You dodged.

Originally posted by Robtard
I have a feeling frantic PMs are being spammed right now
😂 it's possible, it's certainly possible. That thread was the worst example of rightist cognitive dissonance perhaps ever here, and with that im done for the night.

k

Surt, I got your PM, I'm here to help

Good.

And nobody ask him for proof of the PM cuz I ordered it deleted

Originally posted by Surtur
Good.

And nobody ask him for proof of the PM cuz I ordered it deleted

Don't worry, I deleted it in compliance with Voltron-Lite regulations.

@surtur These still stand if you want to actually reply instead of dodging:

Originally posted by Robtard
What's honest about about not baking a cake for two men but baking a cake for a man and woman and hiding behind religion as the reason?

How is FB not honest?

Until then, there's nothing wrong with FB banning Nazis, 'they're a business and the freemarket will sort it all out'.

Originally posted by Robtard
@surtur These still stand if you want to actually reply instead of dodging:

Until then, there's nothing wrong with FB banning Nazis, 'they're a business and the freemarket will sort it all out'.

I've given you the benefit of the doubt too many times in assuming if I answer you would respond in good faith so honestly, gonna stick to my guns here and say no.

You're accusing me of your shit tactics. When someone replies in good-faith, I return the sentiment.

But see I know that's a lie Rob 🙂

If you replied and I did it as you say I do right now, you'd have your proof. So you're just doing the dodge while having to reply act and it's boring. So that's that.

Originally posted by Surtur
I've given you the benefit of the doubt too many times in assuming if I answer you would respond in good faith so honestly, gonna stick to my guns here and say no.
👆

This is the way forward, Surt.

Originally posted by Scribble
👆

This is the way forward, Surt.

Yup.

Usually when people dodge questions they can't answer without compromising their position, they just don't reply and wait for a page or two to flip. That always seems so much easier to me when I see it.