Thor has shown his connection with Mjolnir/Stormbreaker is so powerful it transcends dimensional barriers when he summons it to him. And even an IG blast couldn't stop its momentum after he's thrown it. What proof do you have Ares TK can overpower that?
Him teleporting as you said is merely an evasion tactic.
And the fight takes place on neutral ground. Where in the OP does it say there's just random metal lying around for him to pick up? Not that it would do much to Thor anyway.
Originally posted by KingD19
Thor has shown his connection with Mjolnir/Stormbreaker is so powerful it transcends dimensional barriers when he summons it to him. And even an IG blast couldn't stop its momentum after he's thrown it. What proof do you have Ares TK can overpower that?Him teleporting as you said is merely an evasion tactic.
And the fight takes place on neutral ground. Where in the OP does it say there's just random metal lying around for him to pick up? Not that it would do much to Thor anyway.
The IG blast wasn't necessarily applying a push force to Mjolnir but more a destroying force.
So again Ares will easily control it.
Originally posted by KingD19
By claiming it and expecting people to believe it. Thats his entire strategy.
Originally posted by tkitnaI didn't make anything up. If you don't know what "wasn't necessarily" means then you are behind the curve.
Making stuff up as usual. How can you hope to even prove such blatant garbage as this?
Originally posted by h1a8
I'm not going to sit here and give you an English lesson. You are just legitimately dumb.
So when you said this,,,,,,,
Originally posted by h1a8
The IG blast wasn't necessarily applying a push force to Mjolnir but more a destroying force.
you didnt mean what it actually said? Quit back peddling and explain to us what you meant by that statement then.
Originally posted by tkitna
So when you said this,,,,,,,you didnt mean what it actually said? Quit back peddling and explain to us what you meant by that statement then.
The term "necessarily" refers to deduction. In other words, if the conclusion does not follow from the premises then we simply say that the conclusion isn't "necessarily" true (but it can be true).
The claim was that Stormbreaker resisted a tremendous pushing force. But there is no evidence supporting that over just a mere destroying force.
So it is proper to say, "The blast wasn't necessarily applying a large pushing force." In other words, we can't deduce that from the scene.