Canada may be about to try an Incel as a terrorist.

Started by Old Man Whirly!2 pages

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So you needed to make another intel thread to troll the forum? Did you know about the mass banning warning or are you incapable of reading?
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
He’s made at least 3 socks to troll and now this stupid thread which takes zero ability to muster together
All I see in this thevthreas is polite conversation. As I stated earlier I'm not getting in any flame wars with a ban hammer hanging. Why don't you guys calm yourselves down?

Why do you make the same basic threads over and over
1. Anti Trump threads
2. Incel Threads
3. Racism threads

After Ban Warnings were handing out you cant bear to go on unless you make the same shit posts over and over?

Are you incapable of using the current threads (Which are many) to place these regurgitated threads in. Is it necessary to make a new incel thread every time you feel like making one? Are you incapable of communicating your ideas without your attention whore/npd characteristics of creating a new thread and you can’t carry that conversation in a current thread?

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
although ST he did become a figurehead for them, and the propaganda seemed to trigger him.

https://www.newsweek.com/steve-bannon-targeted-incels-manipulate-cambridge-analytica-whistleblower-christopher-wylie-1468399

Are you unaware every political campaign in the history of the world has used propaganda as trade craft?

Or did you somehow convince yourself that “your side” has never used propaganda in political campaigns, and if you believe that what drugs are you on?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Why do you make the same basic threads over and over
1. Anti Trump threads
2. Incel Threads
3. Racism threads

After Ban Warnings were handing out you cant bear to go on unless you make the same shit posts over and over?

Are you incapable of using the current threads (Which are many) to place these regurgitated threads in. Is it necessary to make a new incel thread every time you feel like making one? Are you incapable of communicating your ideas without your attention whore/npd characteristics of creating a new thread and you can’t carry that conversation in a current thread?

relax Broly stop looking for flame wars in polite and successful threads.

Pertaining to the topic itself, this guy absolutely deserves a harsh sentence as he is obviously a POS. However, nothing outlines a reason to pile on “terrorism” on his resume; this is pure leftist propaganda style journalism akin to clickbait titles.

The very fact that Whirly is passing off his inherent political motives as something innocent speaks volumes of the intolerance he harbors deep in his heart for anything anyone who doesn’t align himself as he does.

Originally posted by Eon Blue
Pertaining to the topic itself, this guy absolutely deserves a harsh sentence as he is obviously a POS. However, nothing outlines a reason to pile on “terrorism” on his resume; this is pure leftist propaganda style journalism akin to clickbait titles.

The very fact that Whirly is passing off his inherent political motives as something innocent speaks volumes of the intolerance he harbors deep in his heart for anything anyone who doesn’t align himself as he does.

nice back seat nodding Eon. I'll let the mods read this thread.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
although ST he did become a figurehead for them, and the propaganda seemed to trigger him.

https://www.newsweek.com/steve-bannon-targeted-incels-manipulate-cambridge-analytica-whistleblower-christopher-wylie-1468399


Oh, definitely. It's astonishing how many Incels seem to be okay with his actions, even if they wouldn't act that way themselves.

I've recently delved into research on the Incel-world and found society has only just started formal investigations into this. The Dept of Homeland Security just gave a grant to a professor from my alma mater to study them. I'm currently following a podcast that interviews several from that community to gain knowledge about them. I've found some of them "cult-hop", which would explain why far right radicalization could stick for some. Even when they don't actively believe something, the sense of camaraderie or meaning will often make them stay. This isn't all of course.

I've also discovered the Femcels in the process. Female incels, although they don't seem to have inspired any outward physical violence.

They both have toxic views on the opposite gender. Incels hiding behind Black pill ideology, and Femcels hiding behind their brand of feminism. I also see a lot of self-loathing rhetoric though, and will admit to feeling some sympathy. I wish I could help them. I'm sure there are legitimate problems society has with "lookism" but it's hard to address that when you have to wade through the vitriol first.

Originally posted by StyleTime
Oh, definitely. It's astonishing how many Incels seem to be okay with his actions, even if they wouldn't act that way themselves.

I've recently delved into research on the Incel-world and found society has only just started formal investigations into this. The Dept of Homeland Security just gave a grant to a professor from my alma mater to study them. I'm currently following a podcast that interviews several from that community to gain knowledge about them. I've found some of them "cult-hop", which would explain why far right radicalization could stick for some. Even when they don't actively believe something, the sense of camaraderie or meaning will often make them stay. This isn't all of course.

I've also discovered the Femcels in the process. Female incels, although they don't seem to have inspired any outward physical violence.

They both have toxic views on the opposite gender. Incels hiding behind Black pill ideology, and Femcels hiding behind their brand of feminism. I also see a lot of self-loathing rhetoric though, and will admit to feeling some sympathy. I wish I could help them. I'm sure there are legitimate problems society has with "lookism" but it's hard to address that when you have to wade through the vitriol first.

will reply later, this deserves a serious reply. 👆

Wow you guys really don't like Whirly.

I'm barely even in this section of the forums and all it takes is a passing glance to see that "random article threads" are being made by a bunch of different members.

You're on different ends of the political spectrum. Shocking that you guys actively dislike each other.

Originally posted by Quincy
Wow you guys really don't like Whirly.

I'm barely even in this section of the forums and all it takes is a passing glance to see that "random article threads" are being made by a bunch of different members.

You're on different ends of the political spectrum. Shocking that you guys actively dislike each other.

I dont dislike anyone, but yes, it is shocking isn't it how collectivism is taking place from a group of posters. Mildly amusing also. But as I indicated, I am not rising to bait or getting in flame wars or even resorting to adhominems. Not with the ban hammer hanging, I'll just stick to topics. 🙂

Originally posted by Quincy
Wow you guys really don't like Whirly.

I'm barely even in this section of the forums and all it takes is a passing glance to see that "random article threads" are being made by a bunch of different members.

You're on different ends of the political spectrum. Shocking that you guys actively dislike each other.

Other than Broly trolling Whirly, I don't know what you're talking about.

And Impediment specifically called out this type of behavior and it is part of why multiple members are on "thin ice."

Originally posted by Impediment
^

That’s another thing I hate about the GDF: Creating an entire thread for one minuscule news article that bears no reason for general discussion.

Article: “Man farts in public”.

“Oooh! I’m gonna make a thread about this in the GDF because I’m such a contributor!!11!!”

There's close to 15 incel threads already including an incel master thread.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Other than Broly trolling Whirly, I don't know what you're talking about.

And Impediment specifically called out this type of behavior and it is part of why multiple members are on "thin ice."

There's close to 15 incel threads already including an incel master thread.

Then we need a master Incel thread, of course you are unaware what he means DDM. 😉

When I first saw this topic I was like "Oh shit I didn't know Bash lived in Canada and was a terrorist". But then I remembered he lives in New Jersey, so it's okay.

Phew. Close one.

Originally posted by Surtur
When I first saw this topic I was like "Oh shit I didn't know Bash lived in Canada and was a terrorist". But then I remembered he lives in New Jersey, so it's okay.

Phew. Close one.

Come on Surt the ban hammer is hanging over the forum. I for one think we all need to show the mods we can get along. The forum has been dead the last few days. Let's cut the adhominems and the stuff that goes back years between people on here.

Originally posted by StyleTime
Oh, definitely. It's astonishing how many Incels seem to be okay with his actions, even if they wouldn't act that way themselves.

I've recently delved into research on the Incel-world and found society has only just started formal investigations into this. The Dept of Homeland Security just gave a grant to a professor from my alma mater to study them. I'm currently following a podcast that interviews several from that community to gain knowledge about them. I've found some of them "cult-hop", which would explain why far right radicalization could stick for some. Even when they don't actively believe something, the sense of camaraderie or meaning will often make them stay. This isn't all of course.

I've also discovered the Femcels in the process. Female incels, although they don't seem to have inspired any outward physical violence.

They both have toxic views on the opposite gender. Incels hiding behind Black pill ideology, and Femcels hiding behind their brand of feminism. I also see a lot of self-loathing rhetoric though, and will admit to feeling some sympathy. I wish I could help them. I'm sure there are legitimate problems society has with "lookism" but it's hard to address that when you have to wade through the vitriol first.

I think you hit the nail on the head, these people want to belong (at least the mails do. I know next to nothing about femcels) so they will belong and take in these strange views for camaraderie. This is the crux of it, they will agree to belong. No matter how twisted the actions of members of their community are because they are outsiders.