Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Ok.That Arrow feat still puts him above Thanos speed-wise. Do you agree with that statement?
No it doesn't. Thanos has blocked supercharged repulsors with a sword by spinning it like a buzzsaw. Thats far superior to reacting to an arrow.
He was also able to take on Cap, Thir, and Tony all at the same time for an extended period without being touched. Stepp was looking worse against Diana and Aquaman.
Originally posted by KingD19
No it doesn't. Thanos has blocked supercharged repulsors with a sword by spinning it like a buzzsaw. Thats far superior to reacting to an arrow.He was also able to take on Cap, Thir, and Tony all at the same time for an extended period without being touched. Stepp was looking worse against Diana and Aquaman.
The attack was telegraphed. Thor shot IM and IM then pointed his hands and weapons at Thanos and fired.
There could be a spinning function on the blade as to why it was spinning. There is a video somewhere explaining it I think.
So it's not superior to reacting to an arrow at point blank range.
Originally posted by h1a8
The arrow feat proves superspeed and reactions. No human could do that feat.
Prove that no movie human would replicate it.
Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Ok.That Arrow feat still puts him above Thanos speed-wise. Do you agree with that statement?
Thanos isn't a part of this fight. if you want to discuss SW vs Thanos. make a thread.