New Evidence Reveals the Corruption of the St. Louis Prosecutor | Pink Polo Update
Oh and also apparently an investigation showed at least one of the protesters was armed.
Originally posted by Surtur
New Evidence Reveals the Corruption of the St. Louis Prosecutor | Pink Polo UpdateOh and also apparently an investigation showed at least one of the protesters was armed.
LOL@ anyone who still calls those thugs "protesters" lol.
Do you have a pic?
Do we know if this allegedly armed protestor threatened the couple first?
Do we know if the protesters verbally threatened the couple first?
Because if you're peacefully protesting and someone points their weapon at you or makes verbal threats, you have the right to respond in kind. Similar goes for the couple, if they were just chilling doing nothing and weapons were pointed at them or threats were made first, they have the right to defend themselves.
What this corrupt governor did was shameful, before he had all the facts, he preemptively said he was going to use his executive power to pardon. At least wait until you get all the facts to make that call. But alas, shit precedent has been set again.
Originally posted by Robtard
Do you have a pic?Do we know if this allegedly armed protestor threatened the couple first?
Do we know if the protesters verbally threatened the couple first?
Because if you're peacefully protesting and someone points their weapon at you or makes verbal threats, you have the right to respond in kind. Similar goes for the couple, if they were just chilling doing nothing and weapons were pointed at them or threats were made first, they have the right to defend themselves.
What this corrupt governor did was shameful, before he had all the facts, he preemptively said he was going to use his executive power to pardon. At least wait until you get all the facts to make that call. But alas, shit precedent has been set again.
I don't have a pic all I have are what the investigation is saying it found.
I don't think we know the timing of the things. Which is why I think it would be wrong to convict them of anything.
Now when it comes to the verbal threats I will say, if you were unarmed and someone pointed a gun at you would you respond by threatening them? Not saying it's solid proof the threats came before...
Originally posted by Surtur
I don't have a pic all I have are what the investigation is saying it found.I don't think we know the timing of the things. Which is why I think it would be wrong to convict them of anything.
Now when it comes to the verbal threats I will say, if you were unarmed and someone pointed a gun at you would you respond by threatening them? Not saying it's solid proof the threats came before...
We'll have to wait and see then.
See above.
That can go either way. Really depends on the people and circumstance. It's not any kind of proof. Still find it hard to believe there's not a lot of camera footage of this considering almost everyone has a camera on them, homes have cameras, street signs etc.
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Regain used Make America Great Again, is he KKK to now ya big dummy?
I assume you meant "Reagan". As usual, you're dodging the point. The point was that the KKK have been aligned with the Right for a long time now.
It's why they most often support Republican candidates and why they flocked to Trump in records numbers during 2016 because of Trump's racist and xenophobic political 'dog whistling', which the KKK and other White Supremacist groups heard loud and clear.
Originally posted by Surtur
I feel like prosecutors should have to prove they were not threatened though, that seems fair.And perhaps there is some footage we do not know about, but I'm sure if it hurts the couples case prosecutors will use it.
Your feelings have been noted. But not sure the law works that way.
The defense is free to do the same regarding video footage, should they have any from say the couple or a friendly neighbor's home surveillance or phone.