Originally posted by Insane Titan
with the deal Epstein got , he was still allowed to go to all his meetings etc whilst getting driven around.
And what about this shit too:
NYPD let convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein skip judge-ordered check-ins
"Convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein never once checked in with city cops in the eight-plus years since a Manhattan judge ordered him to do so every 90 days--and the NYPD says it's fine with that."
I don't remember losers wanting the cops defunded for letting a pedo do this.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Pretty shocking materials. I wouldn't care about it except that it was shortly after Trump was elected. They were digging hard to get something on Trump shortly after he was elected.That's scary as f*ck. That's legit treason.
The sheer audacity is hilarious. And as expected it's already being handwaved by some.
I think even if it was during his presidency, not just the time between election and inauguration, it would not be treason. The Department of Justice has a policy of not investigating sitting presidents for crime, but whether it could be done is a grey zone, pretty sure it's not treason though. And it doesn't extend to questioning witnesses in unrelated cases that might have a connection with a president either. But perhaps I'm wrong on this, and it is much worse as it seems, but from my understanding of this matter, this is not illegal and not treason. I also find it a bit of a stretch to assume this is the Obama administration actively trying to find dirt on Trump, rather than an investigator asking questions that seem prudent to them.
I do agree that the Democrats have made themselves look very foolish with their Russia investigation, and especially the harping on about it for years, though.
I don't think I'm showing bias, I'm just stating my understanding of the legal situation in the united states. Talking about Clinton though, I disagree with her stance on a level of political philosophy, I think it is important in a country that elected representatives are subjects to the laws of the country, so particularly things like corruption do have to be investigated. They should not be investigated on solely a partisan basis, of course.
I think what Clinton said, was less a conviction of hers and more a campaign reply to the popularity of "lock her up" and Trump's talking points about investigating her, that seems to be what most of American politics is, sadly.
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
How many times did Hillary Clinton says“We don’t investigate our political advisories in America!!”
Soon as Trump announced his campaign he was under investigation
Get a grip on your bias
Originally posted by Artol👆
I think I addressed that in my post, I am aware that this was in the time between the election and the inauguration. I don't think that asking a witness about potential involvement of a president-elect in an ongoing criminal investigation is treason, nor do I think it should be.