'Cash-For-Ballots' Fraud Uncovered In Ilhan Omar's Minnesota District: Veritas
My advice to the bootlicking boys: attack the source. You have no other recourse, so just cry about zero hedge.
Originally posted by Surtur
Russia Was Trying To Hurt Trump? Impending Declassification To 'Flip Collusion Theory On Its Head'Intriguing!
” Zero Hedge or ZeroHedge is a far-right libertarian financial blog, presenting staff-written articles and aggregating news and opinions from external sources. “
The places that people choose to go to for information resourcing and the stunning lack of ability that people posses (or don’t possess) to objectively assess information is mind boggling.
Both Trump supporters and Trump attackers are so blind to their own deep seated opinions that they have flushed their entire country down the crapper more so in hopes to prove the other wrong than to seek what is right.
Whether you are democratic or republican, you’re both responsible for what a mess your country is now in.
It’s shameful and embarrassing.
Anyone else concerned about the fact this sets a precedent where custodians of personal information are giving away information to third parties?
Because whole reporters have every right to publish sources, even of protected info, and while this may seem a worthy cause, it's still setting a bad precedent.
Now it's the President. Later, it could be your tax info being sold to third parties. Or medical information, by doctors.
Point is, all we have is the trust of these people, and here they are breaking it, justifications be damned.
Originally posted by Surtur
Russia Was Trying To Hurt Trump? Impending Declassification To 'Flip Collusion Theory On Its Head'Intriguing!
So the Russian anti-Trump ads were not enough?
We have the ads. Tens of thousands of them. Hundreds of thousands, actually.
Here's the deal: most Bernie ads were pro-Bernie.
It was a near 25-25-25-25 split between anti-Trump, pro-Trump, anti-Hillary, pro-Hillary ads.
But almost ALL of the ads were SJW bullshit ads like pro-Native American, pro-BLM shit. That's clearly a progressive/liberal/Democratic appeal ad campaign.
We have all the collected ads readily available for anyone to download and analyze.
Not sure any releases would tell us anything new. Besides declassified docs that clearly indicate Russia was trying to cause Trump to lose?
Originally posted by cdtm
Anyone else concerned about the fact this sets a precedent where custodians of personal information are giving away information to third parties?Because whole reporters have every right to publish sources, even of protected info, and while this may seem a worthy cause, it's still setting a bad precedent.
Now it's the President. Later, it could be your tax info being sold to third parties. Or medical information, by doctors.
Point is, all we have is the trust of these people, and here they are breaking it, justifications be damned.
Now do WikiLeaks.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Now do WikiLeaks.
I'm more worried about a lawyer suddely decoding lawyer-client privilege isn't a barrier to helping the prosecution.
Or similar example. The only reason the system works, is because custodians of secrets don't make exceptions. Exceptions have a habit of snowballing, because there will ALWAYS be "Just this one time".
Dude, the live hearing for Comey is brutal.
Comey is not prepared. He is admitting to things that are definitely making Comey culpable for their actions against Trump:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spKHw3IFUVc
This is not good.
The Rep that was just cross-examining had Comey dead to rights. There's no way Comey can get out of the evidence and the line of questioning he just went through.
Comey should not have answered those questions at all: he just admitted to doing all the bad things he's accused of. He knowingly signed off on the investigation into Trump's campaign knowing full well the intel was bad and that the Democrats were behind the entire ordeal.
Comey would have been better served NOT admitting to working with a Russian asset and the Democrats to spy on Trump. He should have avoided those questions or stating "I don't recall." The guy questioning him reminded him that he is under oath as a hint to not answer the questions. Comey was too stupid to NOT admit to what he did.
Originally posted by dadudemon
The Rep that was just cross-examining had Comey dead to rights. There's no way Comey can get out of the evidence and the line of questioning he just went through.Comey should not have answered those questions at all: he just admitted to doing all the bad things he's accused of. He knowingly signed off on the investigation into Trump's campaign knowing full well the intel was bad and that the Democrats were behind the entire ordeal.
Comey would have been better served NOT admitting to working with a Russian asset and the Democrats to spy on Trump. He should have avoided those questions or stating "I don't recall." The guy questioning him reminded him that he is under oath as a hint to not answer the questions. Comey was too stupid to NOT admit to what he did.
Unless Comey wants to bring a lot of people down with him.
Maybe this is a double middle finger to people he felt were forcing him into an impossible position.
Originally posted by cdtm
Unless Comey wants to bring a lot of people down with him.Maybe this is a double middle finger to people he felt were forcing him into an impossible position.
Could be. But he did try to get out of the questions but that Rep. was relentless and forced to answer yes or no to the sign-offs.