Originally posted by DarkSaint85
This was your rebuttal? It's not really an argument....nor does it address my points.We work off what is given, then lowball numbers to get a rough approximation. I mean, you said this:
So how long would you say a terraforming project would take - what is a reasonable amount of time? 10 million years? 1? 100,000 years? 1,000 years? 100? 10?
Anyway:
😆 😂 But they didn't give you shit to work off though that's the point. YOU continue to ignore that
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvilI’ve been waiting for you to prove to us that you know what haul means.
and how does the chains, by themselves do that? I'll wait
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvilMy point exactly, hence Superman can't break "anything". What does "magic" have to do with anything? 😂 Just recently in your Superman powering The SuN feat, He did it despite months of being continuously bombarded with every type of Kryptonite in existence and ....
So NOPE i don't wanna hear that excuse.
Magic chains, magic weakness and balls to the wall he would have broken them. You know shit.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvilthe panel is clear as day, your post is head canon. 😂
THIS is ALL that was mentioned, They have storylines in comic where terraforming happens in minutes. It's science fiction, if you aren't given all the information needed then be prepared to deal with 100 answers to your question, period.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
THIS is ALL that was mentioned, They have storylines in comic where terraforming happens in minutes. It's science fiction, if you aren't given all the information needed then be prepared to deal with 100 answers to your question, period.
True, so it would be even MORE impressive if we used timespans of minutes, right?
We're calculating a lower bound. Which gives us X numbers. Anything else would be even more than that.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
and how does the chains, by themselves do that? I'll waitMy point exactly, hence Superman can't break "anything". What does "magic" have to do with anything? 😂 Just recently in your Superman powering The SuN feat, He did it despite months of being continuously bombarded with every type of Kryptonite in existence and ....
So NOPE i don't wanna hear that excuse.
It means Tartarus was really powerful.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
True, so it would be even MORE impressive if we used timespans of minutes, right?We're calculating a lower bound. Which gives us X numbers. Anything else would be even more than that.
His intent was that Superman broke chains that haul stars across galaxies. And that that was previously unbreakable to do so is no longer unbreakable. All your calcs is what is extraneous.
your "low" ends and assumptions isn't viable, You don't know how long lived the species is. Perhaps hundreds or thousands of years of transport mean nothing to them. Maybe these stars aren't moved within a lifetime and are towed by automated ships. It actually makes more sense than "we need star from galaxy A moved to galaxy B by Wednesday". Real common sense dictates that it'd be closer to terraforming, a project of several lifetimes, than it would be to moving furniture.
Originally posted by carver9Had no problem physically bending Colossus arms backwards in their encounter. But against Wolverine didn't try any such tactic. He knows he can't.
Don't know why you're quoting him. Hulk didn't go there to kill Wolverine, so why would he try to destroy Wolverine adamantium? I can easily reverse his post back on him.
Hulk can't break the strongest metal in the universe.
Superman can.
Originally posted by Juntai
Had no problem physically bending Colossus arms backwards in their encounter. But against Wolverine didn't try any such tactic. He knows he can't.Hulk can't break the strongest metal in the universe.
Superman can.
Permanently crippling Wolverine is equal to to bending Colossus arms back? Youre better than this, Juanti. You do know i can do the same thing with you in regards to Superman failing to do something, right. You do not want to go here. Also, this...
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
THIS is ALL that was mentioned, They have storylines in comic where terraforming happens in minutes. It's science fiction, if you aren't given all the information needed then be prepared to deal with 100 answers to your question, period.
Originally posted by h1a8
The average distance between galaxies is 9.9 million light years.
The time it takes to haul a star to its destination is less than a year. So let's assume a year.
The equation for distance, acceleration, and time is d=1/2 a t^2
Solving for acceleration gives a = 2d/t^2
Plugging in the values gives 1.88e8 m/s^2
Diving by the acceleration og gravity on Earth (9.8 m/s^2)
Gives over 19 million times the weight of the star that was hauled.Even if you say 100 years (not a reasonable time) then you still get over 1900 stellar weights.
Originally posted by h1a8
Again you are ignoring what I said. We calculate speed from time and distance. If we know 2 quantities then we can solve for the other. The only quantity we know for sure is distance between galaxies.As far as the time we simply pick a reasonable time to haul a single star to its new destination according to writers of fiction.
It's reasonable to suggest less than a year. It's not reasonable to suggest 100 years.Even if we go with the unreasonable time of 100 years then we still get over 1900 stellar weights.
