Biden promises more warmongering if elected

😐 go for it.

Lots of things use fuel einstein. Which is why it'd make more sense to have an agency solely dedicated to studying climate change as opposed to diverting resources at NASA to do so.

Yes. NASA, power plants, aeroplanes and the military should be working on climate change for their own sake and humanity's sake.

Lemme say something I've said before, rocket fuel is mostly Hydrogen and Oxygen exploding into H2O, which is a big contributor of the greenhouse effect.

Lol. See the problem is what if ALL those places do what you just said and end up with different results? What then?

If NASA and the military come to different conclusions, what then? Who do you defer to? The one whose results better fit your narrative?

No, the sane thing is a non-partisan agency solely dedicated to studying it.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol. See the problem is what if ALL those places do what you just said and end up with different results? What then?

If NASA and the military come to different conclusions, what then? Who do you defer to? The one whose results better fit your narrative?

No, the sane thing is a non-partisan agency solely dedicated to studying it.

Originally posted by dadudemon
So which right-wing, pro-war, anti-Brown people, pro-Military Industrial Complex, Democrats are going to be voting for Biden in November?

This is an important question. Definitely needs pro-Biden folks to answer it so I can understand it better.

Originally posted by Blakemore
THEY ALREADY DO!

One more time: who would you defer to?

If NASA concludes climate change is a yuge issue and the military does not, what would you say?

Originally posted by NewGuy01
I will, for the sake of keeping an even more right-wing, even more pro-war, even more anti-brown people, even more pro-military industrial complex Republican out of office. I think that's the natural course of action to take, for someone who cares about these things.
Of course, in the case of someone who doesn't care about these things, I can see how they might be perfectly happy to throw their hands in the air and proclaim "it's a wash" because neither option conforms perfectly to the ideal. Then they can proceed to vote on the basis of the things they actually care about, and not have to take responsibility for the other stuff.

Just to pick one, how is he more anti-brown?

Note: do not respond with lies about him calling all mexicans rapists please, and thank you in advance.

Originally posted by Surtur
One more time: who would you defer to?

If NASA concludes climate change is a yuge issue and the military does not, what would you say?

Originally posted by Blakemore
I'd look at the facts, then make my conclusion as to which side I like if they disagree.

But both places would have also looked at the facts, yes? They would have interpreted them differently.

Or do you feel NASA would reach a conclusion without doing so? Or the military?

Originally posted by Surtur
But both places would have also looked at the facts, yes? They would have interpreted them differently.

Or do you feel NASA would reach a conclusion without doing so? Or the military?

In other words, if NASA and military disagreed you'd just go with whatever one supported the climate change narrative you already believe.

No, I'd go with the side that can be mathematically calculated scientifically and verified by me.

Edit: Or someone I trust.

Lol. That still comes down to you feeling one of those places just plain didn't apply math then.

Originally posted by Blakemore
No, I'd go with the side that can be mathematically calculated scientifically and verified by me.

Edit: Or someone I trust.

Yea, but you trust racists(Biden).

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol. That still comes down to you feeling one of those places just plain didn't apply math then.

Originally posted by Blakemore
You can't disagree with science! That's why it's called science.

You can disagree with science. You just have to have a better explanation with more and better evidence. That's why we no longer go with geocentrism, heliocentrism. Or we no longer think the universe is composed of aether. Or that phrenology is a valid science. Or any of a multitude of other old science.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
You can disagree with science. You just have to have a better explanation with more and better evidence. That's why we no longer go with geocentrism, heliocentrism. Or we no longer think the universe is composed of aether. Or that phrenology is a valid science. Or any of a multitude of other old science.

Also, YouTube video Trump's can't do maths!

This is not a road you wanna go down. Cuz see then I bring up imbeciles on the left trying to argue 2+2 can equal 5 and u don't want that.

Originally posted by Surtur
Just to pick one, how is he more anti-brown?

Note: do not respond with lies about him calling all mexicans rapists please, and thank you in advance.

I will say this, though: for the most part, I expect both candidates to act in solidarity with their party (Biden particularly); and, for the most part, I expect the parties to try to act in a manner that appeals to their respective bases. 'Brown people' have a much stronger presence in the Democratic party (in terms of both voters and representatives) than the Republican party, so I'm honestly comfortable predicting that Biden will be a more 'pro-brown people' president than Trump (whose incentive is to court the alt-right) on that basis alone.