Coronavirus Whistleblower Reveals the Truth about the Virus' Origin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFlqXPl_hZQ

The virus was man-made in a Chinese lab.

I called it. 🙂

*standby for the "That's FOX, it doesn't prove anything!" excuses from the leftist snowflakes* as if FOX or Tucker actually paid her to make up lies on television lol.

I feel like for the sake of being consistent, since I called whirly out, I have to say we *do* have a corona virus thread...

On the other hand, one could argue if they aren't gonna stick to it why should others?

Yup, I don't really give a shit about following rules when pooty makes a dozen anti-Trump threads in a week and he doesn't even so much as get warned about it lol.

Tucker was right about her being extremely brave by coming out against the Chinese government like that. They will probably brand her a traitor and have her killed... or at least imprisoned if they get a hold of her.

It will be dismissed.

Now if she'd come and said "Trump told China to make the virus" it would get more traction.

Yes, it will be either severely downplayed or even completely ignored by the left-leaning pro-establishment media. Doesn't really matter though as Tucker is the #1 cable news show by far so millions of people have already seen it and no amount of spin or trying to cover it up from the commie -lovers is gonna change what she said or lessen the significance of it.

The cat is already out of the bag and there is nothing the pro-chinese sell-out media can do about it.

If it's confirmed that China made this virus and released it onto the world on purpose there's a high probability it will lead to war and no one really wants that so I think everyone will avoid talking about this recent development. They would much rather just keep pretending it was an "accident".

That would explain why we had test kits with PCRs specific to SARS-CoV-2 all the way back in 2019: something not possible unless you actually sequenced the virus already and picked up unique markers that make it identifiable via PCR.

She's pretty hot tho, would bang

Err I mean, I respect her intelligence. Good stuff this revelation. Yes.

Yes indeed.

Originally posted by dadudemon
That would explain why we had test kits with PCRs specific to SARS-CoV-2 all the way back in 2019: something not possible unless you actually sequenced the virus already and picked up unique markers that make it identifiable via PCR.

And don't forget, Fauci is on record saying last year before the virus appeared that the Trump administration would face a surprise outbreak. How would he possibly know that so far ahead of the virus appearing?

Originally posted by dadudemon
That would explain why we had test kits with PCRs specific to SARS-CoV-2 all the way back in 2019: something not possible unless you actually sequenced the virus already and picked up unique markers that make it identifiable via PCR.

https://academic.oup.com/clinchem/article/66/4/549/5719336

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
https://academic.oup.com/clinchem/article/66/4/549/5719336

With the exception of 2019-nCoV and SARS coronavirus, none of the sarbecoviruses have been previously detected in humans. SARS was eliminated in humans and the last reported human SARS case was detected in 2004 (17,). Individuals with samples that are positive in these RT-PCR assays should be considered to be infected by the 2019-nCoV or its related animal coronaviruses. Based on their detection performances, the N gene RT-PCR is recommended as a screening assay, and the Orf1b assay is recommended as a confirmatory one. Using a diagnostic algorithm similar to MERS, an N gene positive/Orf1b negative result should be regarded as indeterminate and the case is recommended to be referred to a WHO reference lab for further testing (18). In the event of having positive PCR results, sequence analyses of positive amplicons can help to confirm the result and to distinguish between 2019-nCoV and other genetically related coronaviruses (e.g., SARS coronavirus).

The biosafety classification of 2019-nCoV is yet to be fully defined. Clinical samples for molecular tests are recommended to be handled using biosafety level 2 practices (19). As SARS coronavirus is classified as a biosafety level 3 (BSL3) pathogen, we therefore intentionally used DNA plasmids as positive controls in these tests. This can avoid distributing SARS coronavirus genomic RNA which has the potential of generating infectious clones via reverse genetics. In addition, this can also help to distribute positive controls to laboratories at different geographical regions in a more cost-effective and robust manner. These DNA plasmid controls are available upon request.

These scientific studies make it so easy to understand for the layman 😉

Sh seems to know more about this virus then Dr. Faucii

They love to cite Fauci, but ignore him when he says Trump didn't mislead people about the virus.

Weird.

Last I heard Ethneo you thought it was 5G towers. Why the change of clearly plausible theories? 😖hifty:

"Coronavirus whistleblower speaks out about possible COVID origin on 'Tucker" -snip

Key word: "Possible"

Claiming Covid-19 started in China is one thing, the wet markets and China's crazy live food processing are likely culprits

Claiming Covid-19 was created and released intentionally is an extreme claim and that requires extreme proof

This thread as of now belongs in the conspiracy forum.

Originally posted by Robtard
"Coronavirus whistleblower speaks out about possible COVID origin on 'Tucker" -snip

Key word: "Possible"

Claiming Covid-19 started in China is one thing, the wet markets and China's crazy live food processing are likely culprits

Claiming Covid-19 was created and released intentionally is an extreme claim and that requires extreme proof

So many wet markets in the world, it's very hard to PROVE it was in a lab, not unplausible but thats what conspiracy folks lean on....like Obama born in hawaii......I kid (you know that last one was chuckle worthy.)

Would anyone be surprised to learn that her 3 co-authors of her non-peer reviewed and unpublished paper have never published any studies before and that other scientists have called this paper a mix of conjecture and fiction and that she has ties to Steve Bannon?

I'm going to go read the paper and other analysis of it.

The left loves non peer reviewed stuff, so I can't wait to see how they respond.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Would anyone be surprised to learn that her 3 co-authors of her non-peer reviewed and unpublished paper have never published any studies before and that other scientists have called this paper a mix of conjecture and fiction and that she has ties to Steve Bannon?

I'm going to go read the paper and other analysis of it.

Oh lordy. Let us know what you find.

Wouldn't surprise me if this turned out to be more fake crap out of team Trump and aired on Fox for the mouth breathers.