Originally posted by jaden_2.0😂 Sounds like half DDM's stuff. 👆
Would anyone be surprised to learn that her 3 co-authors of her non-peer reviewed and unpublished paper have never published any studies before and that other scientists have called this paper a mix of conjecture and fiction and that she has ties to Steve Bannon?I'm going to go read the paper and other analysis of it.
The world's theme song right now:
Originally posted by Robtard
"Coronavirus whistleblower speaks out about possible COVID origin on 'Tucker" -snipKey word: "Possible"
Claiming Covid-19 started in China is one thing, the wet markets and China's crazy live food processing are likely culprits
Claiming Covid-19 was created and released intentionally is an extreme claim and that requires extreme proof
This thread as of now belongs in the conspiracy forum.
Why did you put all your Russian conspiracy threads in the conspiracy forum?
Also why you covering for China
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Last I heard Ethneo you thought it was 5G towers. Why the change of clearly plausible theories? 😖hifty:
Pull your head out of your ass. I never said 5G towers caused the virus, idiot. I said that they damage the immune system which makes it far easier to get the virus which is 100% the truth.
Get your facts straight, dummy.
I have been saying since this virus appeared that it was a man-made virus and was not an accident. Now you're deflecting by claiming I said something I never said because you hate admitting I was right. Rob is the same way of course. No doubt he "bingo"ed your post like an idiot.
Originally posted by BackFire
I really would not be surprised at all if this does turn out to be a man made virus that accidentally got released. But she offered no real evidence to support such a claim.
True, it was just her word. But, I could say the same thing about the dozens of women who accused Trump or Kavanaugh of raping them, or the claim by sore loser Democrats that Trump worked with Putin to win the 2016 election.
Both of which have already been debunked though. This claim by this chinese woman virologist has not. Sorry, but I choose to be believe her over the CCP or the WHO.
Also, she didn't just claim it was man-made, she said it was intentionally released onto the word as well.. Considering how shitty the chinese government is and all the shit they've done it's not that far-fetched. It's not like they didn't have a motive to do it, either.
It's funny how leftists suddenly don't believe what a whistleblower said.
Like Surtur said earlier, if she had come out and said that Trump worked with the chinese government to release the virus then every single leftist on this forum would be eating it up as a "proven fact" and so would the democrats and left-leaning media.
You could bet there would be another bogus "investigation" into Trump and another impeachment hearing from the dems as well.
But since she is putting the blame squarely onto the CCP the China cucks on this forum dismiss it as a "tin-foil hat conspiracy theory" lol.
Oh leftists... smh. ❌
Chinese woman spills the beans on the chinese government intentionally releasing the virus onto the world.
Leftists: "It's a crazy tin-foil hat conspiracy theory! It is just her word, she is lying!"
Some relative of Trump talks bad about him or writes a book desribing some horrible things he has allegedly done.
Leftists:"There it is! This proves undeniably that Trump is a horrible human being! She/he has no reason to lie! He/she like TOTALLY didn't do it for money or attention, either. She/hewanted to warn the world about Trump!".
😆 😆 🤣 😂 😂
Originally posted by BackFire
I really would not be surprised at all if this does turn out to be a man made virus that accidentally got released. But she offered no real evidence to support such a claim.
I agree with this.
TBH the Virus seemed like something that was made specifically to bolster china and hurt the USA and Trump because of his trade war.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
https://academic.oup.com/clinchem/article/66/4/549/5719336
This is what I found:
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Would anyone be surprised to learn that her 3 co-authors of her non-peer reviewed and unpublished paper have never published any studies before and that other scientists have called this paper a mix of conjecture and fiction and that she has ties to Steve Bannon?I'm going to go read the paper and other analysis of it.
Based on some of the extremely shitty published research out there in the "science" land, previously unpublished authors and the lack of a peer review means little to nothing to me.
Since we have a replication crisis where 50% to 90% of all research cannot be duplicated (meaning, it is shit science no better than arbitrary guesses), I have little faith in research. Instead, I look for good methodologies and intelligent data analysis. And then form my own opinion. While also acknowledging that they could have doctored their result values just to get the significance figure they wanted.
I've talked about this, before. The only place you're going to find super hardcore, unbiased, pure science, is in machining and consumer automotive. Even then, there is bias. But you'll get a set of scientists that will find a result that shows a failure at .003% of the time during specific stress tests. They will tell you, for sure, if the stress tests are legitimate to the vast majority of use cases in the real world. And if the stress test results are indicative of a safety concern. Business people then decide to accept the risk or reject it. If rejected, rework gets done. It gets expensive.
So if you see a car get recalled for a very deadly result, it is extremely likely that real science already found that risk but some big wig accepted the risk and they went to production, anyway.
Feels like we are getting off track. I'm not too concerned about the previously unpublished authors. I'd be concerned with the data, itself. And what exactly they are trying to claim from whatever research they did.
Originally posted by samhain
I think the possibility of China releasing the virus purposefully should absolutely be investigated and likely has already from the get-go. I doubt that the intelligence communities around the world have ignored that possibility.
What could they really do though?
I mean, when that whistleblower from Israel blabbed about their secret nuclear weapons program, breaking a bunch of treaties, did he have any real evidence but his word? And were other countries in a position to confirm or deny its existence?
Granted; Israel kidnapping the guy back to his homeland and imposing a lifetime gag order kind of proves his case, more then his actual word did.