I, like I think everyone, was wanting to see Gohan as like a 14/15 year old struggling between studies and threats wanting revenge who were looking for Goku, but more like General Tao, not Garlic Jr. Goku as like spiritual guidance when things get tough for example and maybe people from Vegeta's past too, having him as a fatherly voice, but moreso to Trunks.
Originally posted by ilikecomics
Okay that's why i asked if you were actually looking at how instances of privitized medicine are cheaper or if you were looking at America's current mixed economy model, which is NOT free market healthcare.
This literally has nothing to do at all with what you are talking about.
It's actually a non sequitur reply.
Way more of column A, it would seem. In fact, you're so stupid that even trying to talk to people like you is a giant waste of my time.
Congrats: you've graduated to the "this guy is definitely retarded" list.
Originally posted by dadudemon
This literally has nothing to do at all with what you are talking about.It's actually a non sequitur reply.
Way more of column A, it would seem. In fact, you're so stupid that even trying to talk to people like you is a giant waste of my time.
Congrats: you've graduated to the "this guy is definitely retarded" list.
You literally just helped chart me as anarcho capitalist a few days ago. The points im trying to argue for, perhaps poorly, are consistent with thinkers in that school of thought.
Im not trying to be disingenuous with you and im not trying to dodge the point youre making, so let me try another way.
The data you showed is correct, im not arguing it isnt. What i am making a positive claim about is that if the government stepped out of healthcare (or any other domain for that matter) in terms of regulation, subsidization, inflation taxation, spending etc. Our healthcare performance would increase.
My argument could still be consistent and agreeable with your data. The uk is a much smaller gov. So that already cuts down on spending. The population is also smaller so less people to service.
I can show you examples but i think you would benefit if you retrained from name calling, it doesnt strengthen your argument and if anything shows a weakness in character.
What i am making a positive claim about is that if the government stepped out of healthcare (or any other domain for that matter) in terms of regulation, subsidization, inflation taxation, spending etc. Our healthcare performance would increase.
That very well could be the case. However when we look at a system like healthcare and the purpose/value it has to society is it better to run it through a purely capitalistic system that benefits cost analysis over human suffering?
That is exactly where govt steps in and helps us evaluate our system to make sure we don't step on ppl for numerical greatness.
Originally posted by ilikecomics
You literally just helped chart me as anarcho capitalist a few days ago. The points im trying to argue for, perhaps poorly, are consistent with thinkers in that school of thought.Im not trying to be disingenuous with you and im not trying to dodge the point youre making, so let me try another way.
The data you showed is correct, im not arguing it isnt. What i am making a positive claim about is that if the government stepped out of healthcare (or any other domain for that matter) in terms of regulation, subsidization, inflation taxation, spending etc. Our healthcare performance would increase.
My argument could still be consistent and agreeable with your data. The uk is a much smaller gov. So that already cuts down on spending. The population is also smaller so less people to service.
I can show you examples but i think you would benefit if you retrained from name calling, it doesnt strengthen your argument and if anything shows a weakness in character.
No, you're just an idiot. You can barely form coherent thoughts. Not worth my time. You should feel bad about being relegated to this type of internet cretin - I'm fairly tolerant and amicable.
If you're Whirly trying to be a right-wing retard parody, good job. Still lost the "right" to get the privilege of engaging with me. So, this is the last reply I will make to you.
Originally posted by dadudemon
No, you're just an idiot. You can barely form coherent thoughts. Not worth my time. You should feel bad about being relegated to this type of internet cretin - I'm fairly tolerant and amicable.If you're Whirly trying to be a right-wing retard parody, good job. Still lost the "right" to get the privilege of engaging with me. So, this is the last reply I will make to you.
Im just me. Ive always seen you as a nice guy and im curious why youre being so aggressive. Do you feel im being dishonest? Are you familiar with Austrian economics at all? If you are, would you disagree this vehemently with anyone espousing austrian ideas? Also im culturally left, just economically right... So no caricature. Ive already told you im not trolling or trying to get a rise out of you.
Edit: i hope you dont quit replying to me. I think youre cool and actually wanted to eventually broach the topic of mormonism with you. But again ive asked you to pm so as to not have the pressures of the arena that is publicly viewable conversation
Originally posted by ilikecomicsDDM is a nice guy when not gaslighting, he just has an ego slightly smaller than mine and has not learnt to accept he is wrong yet or other peoples arguments even when they are contrary to him. Sometimes, I think it and his gaslighting are some kind of unusual autism. But, he is still a nice guy, despite his occasional tantrums.
Im just me. Ive always seen you as a nice guy and im curious why youre being so aggressive. Do you feel im being dishonest? Are you familiar with Austrian economics at all? If you are, would you disagree this vehemently with anyone espousing austrian ideas? Also im culturally left, just economically right... So no caricature. Ive already told you im not trolling or trying to get a rise out of you.Edit: i hope you dont quit replying to me. I think youre cool and actually wanted to eventually broach the topic of mormonism with you. But again ive asked you to pm so as to not have the pressures of the arena that is publicly viewable conversation
Notice he mentions me when talking about you, clearly your wrong views are not mine. But I am also clearly in his head. You have many good insights and a generally wrong ideology in my honest opinion.
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
DDM is a nice guy when not gaslighting, he just has an ego slightly smaller than mine and has not learnt to accept he is wrong yet or other peoples arguments even when they are contrary to him. Sometimes, I think it and his gaslighting are some kind of unusual autism. But, he is still a nice guy, despite his occasional tantrums.Notice he mentions me when talking about you, clearly your wrong views are not mine. But I am also clearly in his head. You have many good insights and a generally wrong ideology in my honest opinion.
It's okay, i act that way at least once a day. Usually because im hungry lol
I actually think the same thing about you. We've never had to be nasty to eachother but your ideology is in diametric opposition to mine.
My main two problems with socialism is the impossibility of cost calculation, thus making things inefficient (in terms of manufacturing, production, innovation, etc.), and the fact that any form of collectivism is coercivie and forceful in a way that's asymmetrical.
I think my two problems with communism are solved via the destruction of the state. I could also explain why if you care to ask.
Anyways, youre cool and anyone else on here. It's a small place, population wise, so i think getting along should be possible, even with the occasional out burst.
Like a loving yet dysfunctional family lol
💃
Originally posted by ilikecomicsYeah, don't disagree except on politics and religion. The only time you'll ever see me "lose" it is to trigger a reaction from others for lulz.
It's okay, i act that way at least once a day. Usually because im hungry lolI actually think the same thing about you. We've never had to be nasty to eachother but your ideology is in diametric opposition to mine.
My main two problems with socialism is the impossibility of cost calculation, thus making things inefficient (in terms of manufacturing, production, innovation, etc.), and the fact that any form of collectivism is coercivie and forceful in a way that's asymmetrical.
I think my two problems with communism are solved via the destruction of the state. I could also explain why if you care to ask.
Anyways, youre cool and anyone else on here. It's a small place, population wise, so i think getting along should be possible, even with the occasional out burst.
Like a loving yet dysfunctional family lol💃