The Next Supreme Court Justice

*Buddhist walking down the street wearing a swastika* IT'S THE CONTEXT PLEASE STOP GIVING ME DIRTY LOOKS!!!!

Originally posted by Surtur
*Buddhist walking down the street wearing a swastika* IT'S THE CONTEXT PLEASE STOP GIVING ME DIRTY LOOKS!!!!

Correct 👆

^ Context matters

Lol. Indeed. Go walk down the streets in Israel with a swastika, and just tell folk you're a buddhist.

Explain the context and they will understand, right?

Tell me you feel they'd understand. Type it out 🙂

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol. Indeed. Go walk down the streets in Israel with a swastika, and just tell folk you're a buddhist.

Explain the context and they will understand, right?

Tell me you feel they'd understand. Type it out 🙂

Originally posted by Newjak
Like Robtard said context matters.

At this point we're going to move on if you guys are going to pretend they'd actually be understanding over this.

I feel like you both know they wouldn't, but refuse to acknowledge it so I see no point in continuing. You also ignored the fact the complaint was about how preference suggests choice, which is true no matter who uses it.

So we move on.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol. Indeed. Go walk down the streets in Israel with a swastika, and just tell folk you're a buddhist.

Explain the context and they will understand, right?

Tell me you feel they'd understand. Type it out 🙂

Did you actually think this was a sensible retort and that you proved your failed points?

Please say you did, it will be even more hilarious.

Originally posted by Newjak
Like Robtard said context matters.

Bingo.

Originally posted by Robtard
Did you actually think this was a sensible retort and that you proved your failed points?

Please say you did, it will be even more hilarious.

So we've reached the pretend win part of the discussion.

Okay kid.

Context matters, Surt. You can pretend it doesn't, but it does.

I can't wait to see ACB confirmed.

I hope she uses the term sexual preference in the future too, always love seeing leftist hypocrisy exposed.

There, there, surt

The media are trying to smear Amy Coney Barrett for being a Christian again — this time labeling her as 'anti-gay'

They love to try to smear. Par for the course for these imbeciles. As if the pathetic hypocrisy over "sexual preference" wasn't enough.

Barrett served for three years on the board of a private Christian school affiliated with the People of Praise religious cult of which she and her husband are long-time members, that bars LGBTQ faculty and students, as well as the children of same-sex couples, despite receiving financial support from the government.

So, yeah, anti-gay.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Barrett served for three years on the board of a private Christian school affiliated with the People of Praise religious cult of which she and her husband are long-time members, that bars LGBTQ faculty and students, as well as the children of same-sex couples, despite receiving financial support from the government.

So, yeah, anti-gay.

show me one anti-gay statement

just one

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Barrett served for three years on the board of a private Christian school affiliated with the People of Praise religious cult of which she and her husband are long-time members, that bars LGBTQ faculty and students, as well as the children of same-sex couples, despite receiving financial support from the government.

So, yeah, anti-gay.

The barring of LGBTQ people is anti-gay in of itself, but what do the children of same-sex couples have to do with it? Do they not realize that those children can be straight?

So, no proof she is anti gay? Understood.

Originally posted by Robtard
The barring of LGBTQ people is anti-gay in of itself, but what do the children of same-sex couples have to do with it? Do they not realize that those children can be straight?

It is just further evidence of their anti-gay animus. It is not enough that they barr LGBTQ people, but also straight/cisgender/heterosexual people with same-sex parents. All while taking government money.

So can you post anything she said that was anti-gay or no? You can't be that inferior, so give me the quotes.

We can embrace guilt by association. You will not like how that ends. But type out that you want to embrace it and we shall 👆

YouTube video

I honestly love being better than the hypocrites who thought this was only okay for some 👆

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
It is just further evidence of their anti-gay animus. It is not enough that they barr LGBTQ people, but also straight/cisgender/heterosexual people with same-sex parents. All while taking government money.

Their gov funding should be revoked.