Originally posted by Newjak
Honestly I expected better from you at least.
I feel the same about your response. I didn't think you had TDS and could see through the bullshit instead of falling for the Dem-talking points.
Originally posted by Newjak
Honestly all you have to do to see Trump's failed environmental policies is google it real quick.
Have? You see them as fails, I see them as wins. Trump has a few wins and about 70% of his environmental policies, I saw as wins (but I more closely identify with the Green Party positions on environment which means I'm all for proven, safe, and effective energy including goal and drilling. In fact, pipelines are very safe and we should explore more with pipeline stuff - costs far less C02 crap to pipe it than it does to train or vehicle transport it.
Remember, I am not a "destroy everything because climate change" person. I am a no-nonsense regulation person who only cares about pollution NOT C02 emissions as that's a stupid argument and always will be. The world is better served by focusing on pollution and private research on energy.
Originally posted by Newjak
The economy part is also a lie.
You're factually wrong. Literally, none of the facts match your (this is really a Democratic perspective, not your actual perspective) perspective. I've covered this argument already with the actual facts so there's no need to cyclically "debate" it: there's nothing to debate and I covered all angles including the "little guy" angle with the Shadow Stat. So you can either update your perspective because the facts don't match or you can double down. When presented with such sweeping inexorable facts, your only option, to deal with the heaping amounts of cognitive dissoance, are to attack the stats, themselves. Perhaps you could argue that the U3-U6 statistics as biased to be pro-Trump. Then you could also argue that the Shadow Stat is also biased to be pro-Trump (despite both being tracked long before Trump was around). Are you wishing to make that argument? If so, what are you objective facts to support that position?