The intrigue behind Pope Francis' "bombshell" comments on same-sex civil unions

Originally posted by Blakemore
Did you even take a science class? 😂

Cells are made up of molecules, which are made up of atoms. It's a transition of electrons in order to transfer energy. The transfer of matter evolves through organisms and creates new organisms. That's basic biology. Is it far-fetched to assume over a million years that species of animals can differ to the point that reproduction can't occur? For example, wolves and dolphins?

Taken many, moron. Taking science classes doesn't make you an expert on science when they are mixing many lies in with the truth which they all do. Taking science classes or having degrees in science doesn't prove a god**** thing.

I could quote plenty of people with science degrees who don't believe in evolutionism nonsense but you would claim they don't count lol.

Kent Hovind taught high school science and math for 15 years and he has a degree as well yet you call him dumb lol. I guarantee you he is far more knowledgeable about real science than you are, dummy.

You're a troll and I won't entertain your BS any longer. We'll see who's right when Judgment Day comes. Until then, go have another drink lol.

I won't even bother. 👆

Originally posted by wxyz
What about the fossil evidence that shows transition species like Archaeopteryx ?

And what scientific laws does it violate?

It is not a transition species I don't care what that probably biased article says that I didn't bother to click on. There are no transitional species. There is no "index column". There is no such thing as "pre-historic". There are no "vestigial structures" either.

The "theory" of evolutionism along with the stupid big bang theory violates the first two laws of thermodynamics and the law of biogenesis. Those are just off the top of my head and they are the most damaging ones to the theories. I'm sure there are many others.

There is nothing scientific about evolutionism. What evolutionists do is show examples of what they call "microevolution" (which actually is a scientific fact) and claim that it somehow proves the entire theory, which it doesn't.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Why isn’t this thread in the religion forum?

Don't know. Maybe the mods could move it.

If a monkey gave birth to a human, our entire understanding of evolution would be wrong and we'd have to rethink things, yet, creationists would have to say evolution is true because a monkey can give birth to a human. So even when they're right, they're still wrong. 😬

Originally posted by Eon Blue
Religion is very important and a cornerstone of humanity. To advocate an objective truth in the realm of subjective is to be the very epitome of that: subjective.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
It is not a transition species I don't care what that probably biased article says that I didn't bother to click on. There are no transitional species. There is no "index column". There is no such thing as "pre-historic". There are no "vestigial structures" either.

The "theory" of evolutionism along with the stupid big bang theory violates the first two laws of thermodynamics and the law of biogenesis. Those are just off the top of my head and they are the most damaging ones to the theories. I'm sure there are many others.

There is nothing scientific about evolutionism. What evolutionists do is show examples of what they call "microevolution" (which actually is a scientific fact) and claim that it somehow proves the entire theory, which it doesn't.

I recommend you go watch it. It does a good job of explaining evolution in some of his videos often times by breaking down the arguments of creationists who make similar arguments as to what you just made here.

Also I would check viced rhino. He also puts out great content. His isn't as scientific as stick's but he still does a good job explaining the scientific principles.

His channel in particular is good about the logical parts of these arguments.