Trump Accountability Project

Originally posted by dadudemon
Sure:“

https://twitter.com/

instagram.com

facebook.com

https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/individual-contributions/?two_year_transaction_period=2020&min_date=01%2F01%2F2019&max_date=12%2F31%2F2020

https://www.opensecrets.org/donor-lookup

https://gab.com/

reddit.com

https://www.glaad.org/trump

That is what she said. She even clarified that it is specifically why she wanted to do it. Nice try? Not sure why you're being dishonest.“

It doesn't matter if you are denying the inexorable proof presented right before your eyes: these facts still stand true regardless of your denying them.“

You mean a set of people who came from both left and right wing politics who voted for Trump? You mean a set of people who are not organized at all and among whom only a small set are armed and organized?“

Okay. But I still do not view you as an honest actor in this conversation since you've denied, 3 times now, direct evidence.“

Okay, Whirly. Continue to be Whirly as you pretend to "sign out" of your main account and continue on your sock accounts.“

The fact is anyone who is honest with themselves would acknowledge that if Trump tweeted out the names of democrat donors(public information) and said they were "complicit" people would scream bloody murder.

I wonder if folk like Adam will acknowledge this or play dumb.

Originally posted by Surtur
The fact is anyone who is honest with themselves would acknowledge that if Trump tweeted out the names of democrat donors(public information) and said they were "complicit" people would scream bloody murder.

I wonder if folk like Adam will acknowledge this or play dumb.

Be fair:

The actual names were not tweeted out. Only that they (Trumpers) should be archived and captured so they can be pursued for persecution even if they removed their tweets/posts.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Be fair:

The actual names were not tweeted out. Only that they (Trumpers) should be archived and captured so they can be pursued for persecution even if they removed their tweets/posts.

It's only a matter of time before it happens and this isn't the first time leftists pulled this. One of the Castro brothers(not the Cuban ones lol) posted the names and work places of trump donors in texas I think.

From what I've read I still don't really understand. People who were complicit could be a lot of things. The one quote that says "Anyone who took a paycheck to help Trump." Also, I'm assuming, people that wrote a paycheck to him? For anything? The "persecution" would obviously be dependent on what exactly they did/how severe.... whatever they did was. Weird.

Is this basically going to end up being like a sex offender list? You can just look it up and be like oh he supported Trump, nothing can be done about it legally but at least we know this guy's an ass hole? That kinda thing?

Also those who have no issue for the list: what should happen to those who end up on it?

Should it go beyond shaming? Should there be real life consequences too like the loss of employment? Or would that go too far?

And for those tempted to post smug statements about the 1A: don't. I have not said this is illegal.

Trocity: You're acting like leftists have ever actually given a damn about acting within the bounds of the law lol.

Originally posted by Trocity
From what I've read I still don't really understand. People who were complicit could be a lot of things. The one quote that says "Anyone who took a paycheck to help Trump." Also, I'm assuming, people that wrote a paycheck to him? For anything? The "persecution" would obviously be dependent on what exactly they did/how severe.... whatever they did was. Weird.

Is this basically going to end up being like a sex offender list? You can just look it up and be like oh he supported Trump, nothing can be done about it legally but at least we know this guy's an ass hole? That kinda thing?

Bingo. I would never trust their definition of the word "complicit".

Hell AOC thought Trump was putting kids in concentration camps. She can't be trusted.

It reminds me of the "Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences" saying.

What an intentionally vague and threatening proposition that is. It seems like a horrible idea, ngl.

Originally posted by Robtard
He's a closet Trumper, he's not really fooling anyone. Who cares what he says. Anyhow.

On page one I copy/pasted from the site itself:

-Individuals who worked for the Trump for President campaign, Republican National Committee, and affiliated PACs in 2016 or 2020.

-Individuals who worked in any role as a political appointee in the Trump Administration.

-Individuals who used their massive personal wealth and influence to bundle money for Trump.

^That's not "71 million" people going under those parameters. They're gaslighting and using boogeyman tactics.

Just saw this. Still think it's a bad idea. "Individuals who worked in any role as a political appointee in the Trump Administration"? Yikes man, that really does sound like a witch hunt, idk...

"Not everyone who voted for Donald Trump is a racist or a bad person, but anyone who worked under him during his tenure as president definitely is." That is such a dangerous line of thinking.

I don't want to be a bringer of doom and gloom, just seems like a slippery slope to me.

SM isn't even a trumper lol.

And it is gaslighting. Nobody thought they'd go after all 70 million voters.

...Then they came for the Trumpers...

Originally posted by Surtur
SM isn't even a trumper lol.

And it is gaslighting. Nobody thought they'd go after all 70 million voters.

Originally posted by dadudemon
71+ million people do have something to be concerned about, though.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0

Yeah you failed here. All Trump voters *should* be concerned about this, even if most won't end up on the list.

You want another shot or no?

I don't need another shot. I already torpedoed you the first time.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I don't need another shot. I already torpedoed you the first time.

Concession accepted.

Originally posted by Surtur
Concession accepted.

Here...for you.

Originally posted by Trocity
Just saw this. Still think it's a bad idea. "Individuals who worked in any role as a political appointee in the Trump Administration"? Yikes man, that really does sound like a witch hunt, idk...

"Not everyone who voted for Donald Trump is a racist or a bad person, but anyone who worked under him during his tenure as president definitely is." That is such a dangerous line of thinking.

I don't want to be a bringer of doom and gloom, just seems like a slippery slope to me.

No problem with thinking it's a bad idea, I don't think it's a great idea.

The problem is the fear mongering and imagined bogeyman we've seen in here since page one with reference to the Red Scare and the Holocaust. No one is coming after 71million voters. Average people and their silly pro-Trump Facebook posts and tweets are not the subjects of this list. It's the select influential and powerful few.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Here...for you.

No worries kid, you'll get the bingo you desire.

And we know how much that upsets you.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
And we know how much that upsets you.

You keep on pretending 👆