Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Silent Master only cares about defending Republicans by criticizing Democrats. He turns a blind eye to Republican malfeasance. If he cannot use it to slam Democrats, he does not pay attention. You know, like a totally normal self-identified liberal.
He's a closet Trumper, he's not really fooling anyone. Who cares what he says. Anyhow.
On page one I copy/pasted from the site itself:
-Individuals who worked for the Trump for President campaign, Republican National Committee, and affiliated PACs in 2016 or 2020.
-Individuals who worked in any role as a political appointee in the Trump Administration.
-Individuals who used their massive personal wealth and influence to bundle money for Trump.
^That's not "71 million" people going under those parameters. They're gaslighting and using boogeyman tactics.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes, because as a left-leaning individual. I don't like that the side that is supposed to represent me has so many racist and corrupt people in it.
Well Biden is the king now (because YOUR VOTE DIDN'T MATTER BEEYOTCH🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😉 )so I guess he's the "Quintessential Racist" going forward 👑🎖️🗽🇺🇲...
Originally posted by Silent Master
Really, post the quote where I "admitted to supporting and voting for racists".
I do not need to quote it, because we have been over this. You continue to call Democrats racist, but admitted supporting for both Gabbard and Sanders who were Democratic candidates for president. So by your own reasoning, you support and vote for racists. Unless or until you stop saying Democrats are racist, you will continue to be someone who supports and votes for racists, by your own reasoning and admission. Sorry, I did not make the rules, you did. So keep it up, racist.
Originally posted by Robtard
He's a closet Trumper, he's not really fooling anyone. Who cares what he says. Anyhow.On page one I copy/pasted from the site itself:
-Individuals who worked for the Trump for President campaign, Republican National Committee, and affiliated PACs in 2016 or 2020.
-Individuals who worked in any role as a political appointee in the Trump Administration.
-Individuals who used their massive personal wealth and influence to bundle money for Trump.
^That's not "71 million" people going under those parameters. They're gaslighting and using boogeyman tactics.
It basically sounds like anyone who politically backed Trump will be blacklisted from future government positions. This is good. Weed out the weak-minded 👆
Originally posted by dadudemonI'm really not interested in playing "gotcha" games here. If such a database(s) already exists with government & media involvement/funding, then just link them.
Oh, you mean like the 3 databases that already collected this information and already exists? So now what is your response?Then be worried because it is. And members of the media. The exact recipe of fascism.
It exists. I posted it. I used names, direct quotes, and links.
Are you trollin', bro?
But that's not what I'm seeing in the OP.
How is archiving (to hedge against deletions and denials) every single utterance of Trump support on social media so that Trumpers can be persecuted "non-specific"?Not here to defend AOC but that's not what she said, I know that because I know that she's intelligent enough to fathom that such archive is way beyond her ability to create. Unless the Pentagon is also now involved in this project.
You DO understand that this is the same exact method (just through modern technology) that Stalin and Hitler used to squash political opponents and people who opposed them, right?I'm well aware that a state-sanctioned, media-supported, well funded operation to create such a database should be considered a threat to civil liberties by any standard yes, I just don't think see any proof that this is actually what's happening.
Originally posted by dadudemon70 million "dissidents", plenty of them armed and organised. And with a President-elect who has called for bipartianship and reconciliation, not the demonisation and repression of his political opponents. Which would definitely cost him a second term. They Dems don't even have Congress. I'm sorry but I'm just not buying it.
No it doesn't. It only needs a significant portion of people in power to make it happen. And then stamp out the dissidents.Additionally, did you notice that a majority of voters voted for Biden? So you're wrong from both angles.
And yes they voted Biden, a moderate centrist, not a far-left authoritarian.
Lastly, Trumpers have been consistently targeted for violence, cancel culture, and persecution for the last four years. That includes children wearing MAGA hats. Children.This is a fair point and I'm happily concede it. I also agree with Surt that if any consequences are to be had they will be social. Any 'hit list', however extensive, runs the risk of encouraging not just online harrassment but politically motivated violence that has become increasingly commonplace.
Fyi I do not and never stated that this sort of behavior should be encouraged, but I still do not believe it to be a precursor to fascism, just a continuation of an increasingly vitriolic political environment.
And I still think you're Whirly.And I'm okay with that. 😉
Originally posted by DarthAloysius
I'm really not interested in playing "gotcha" games here. If such a database(s) already exists with government & media involvement/funding, then just link them.But that's not what I'm seeing in the OP.
Not here to defend AOC but that's not what she said, I know that because I know that she's intelligent enough to fathom that such archive is way beyond her ability to create. Unless the Pentagon is also now involved in this project.I'm well aware that a state-sanctioned, media-supported, well funded operation to create such a database should be considered a threat to civil liberties by any standard yes, I just don't think see any proof that this is actually what's happening.
70 million "dissidents", plenty of them armed and organised. And with a President-elect who has called for bipartianship and reconciliation, not the demonisation and repression of his political opponents. Which would definitely cost him a second term. They Dems don't even have Congress. I'm sorry but I'm just not buying it.
And yes they voted Biden, a moderate centrist, not a far-left authoritarian.
This is a fair point and I'm happily concede it. I also agree with Surt that if any consequences are to be had they will be social. Any 'hit list', however extensive, runs the risk of encouraging not just online harrassment but politically motivated violence that has become increasingly commonplace.
Fyi I do not and never stated that this sort of behavior should be encouraged, but I still do not believe it to be a precursor to fascism, just a continuation of an increasingly vitriolic political environment.
And I'm okay with that. 😉
Sure:“
instagram.com
facebook.com
https://www.opensecrets.org/donor-lookup
reddit.com
That is what she said. She even clarified that it is specifically why she wanted to do it. Nice try? Not sure why you're being dishonest.“
It doesn't matter if you are denying the inexorable proof presented right before your eyes: these facts still stand true regardless of your denying them.“
You mean a set of people who came from both left and right wing politics who voted for Trump? You mean a set of people who are not organized at all and among whom only a small set are armed and organized?“
Okay. But I still do not view you as an honest actor in this conversation since you've denied, 3 times now, direct evidence.“
Okay, Whirly. Continue to be Whirly as you pretend to "sign out" of your main account and continue on your sock accounts.“