Superman runs the Gauntlet

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Don't care enough to convince to you, your opinion doesn't really matter. 👍

😂 its not even asking for convincing, but explanation. Guess you're wrong once again but are just too chicken poop to admit it

Originally posted by abhilegend
How's it non canon? It directly references multiple in canon stories.

It references Nuclear Man who's canon in DC rebirth only.

So nope, it's canon all the way.

there's no point proving those marvel trolls wrong, they gonna keep saying non-canon. they wouldn't be able to live if they don't lie to themselves everyday.

I think the question cones from it being originally a walmart comic and emphasis on it not being tied to continuity as expressed by Kubert below.

https://www.ign.com/articles/2018/09/06/how-this-new-superman-comic-aims-to-hook-new-dc-readers

Soon to be a moot question, perhaps?

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
What concession? because didn't nuclear man die in the story they brought him in for? Why would Superman be worried about a clearly dead villain to even mention him?

Originally posted by TheHulkster
I think the question cones from it being originally a walmart comic and emphasis on it not being tied to continuity as expressed by Kubert below.

https://www.ign.com/articles/2018/09/06/how-this-new-superman-comic-aims-to-hook-new-dc-readers

Lol...

Originally posted by TheHulkster
I think the question cones from it being originally a walmart comic and emphasis on it not being tied to continuity as expressed by Kubert below.

https://www.ign.com/articles/2018/09/06/how-this-new-superman-comic-aims-to-hook-new-dc-readers

They targeted a different audience, one that doesn’t follow the soap opera of dc comics. This is a one arc deal. It doesn’t continue to a new story like or is tied into one that is going to the next arc.

Now the question for you is, is it canon? Yes or no?

Originally posted by JBL
That really means that of all the powerful beings in the universe, he wanted the most tenacious ones.

Were you home schooled, by any chance?

Originally posted by C1ark
Were you home schooled, by any chance?

Originally posted by JBL
Do you know how to comprehend by any chance? Or do I have to break that statement down for you piece by piece?

Please break down that statement piece by piece. I am having a lot of trouble comprehending how you interpret the English language

[QUOTE=17365530]Originally posted by TheHulkster
[B]I think the question cones from it being originally a walmart comic and emphasis on it not being tied to continuity as expressed by Kubert below.

“I wanted people that normally didn’t read comics to pick this up and just be sucked right into it and not have to work to see what’s going on,” Kubert explained.

“It’s big and bombastic and it’s simple,” Kubert said. “If you’re going to a Walmart a month later [to pick up the next issue], all you have to remember is, Superman is trying to save a girl.” King added on, saying, “You don’t have to know a single thing about continuity, you don’t have to know anything about the history of comics. You just have to know that Superman is a superhero, and he’s in love with Lois Lane, and he hates Lex Luthor. ... As long as you keep those facts, you can pick up and read it.”

So it's written in a way to a appeal to people who don't read comics, yes?

"you don't have to know about previous continuity" =/= "the book itself is out of continuity"

The creative team was told to write the book in a way which does not alienate new readers. So in order to achieve that all they had to to do was introduce new storylines and characters which don't depend on previously released comicbooks. The actual book itself (UP in the Sky) does not need to be non-canon in order to appeal to the general audience. Unless something in the book specifically contradicts established continuity I don't see why it should be treated as non-canon

Originally posted by C1ark
Please break down that statement piece by piece. I am having a lot of trouble comprehending how you interpret the English language

😂

Originally posted by JBL
post the statement word for word and I will gladly explain how to understand the subject and when it shifts. It's just like me saying I'm looking for the " fastest." of all the powerful corvettes. Now what kind of Corvettes am I talking about? Because there are many types of powerful Corvettes out there, but I'm looking for a particular kind,right?

You forget that there is a comma separating tenacious and powerful.......

I forgot nothing. That comma is the factor.

Nowhere in that scan did it say " one of the most powerful being in the universe" he was focusing on the most tenacious, I will say it again, the most tenacious, powerful beings.. stop! He and no point said most powerful. He said powerful.

Eh.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I don't think it's any secret that Alberto is a troll. If people choose to engage with him, that's their business.

Same with the likes of JBL, Mr. Mind, Broly etc.

Originally posted by JBL
Nowhere in that scan did it say " one of the most powerful being in the universe" he was focusing on the most tenacious, I will say it again, the most tenacious, powerful beings.. stop! He and no point said most powerful. He said powerful.

Now factoring in the comma what’s in focus? You’re lazy or a stupid troll or both?

Are you as dumb as a doorbell? Of all the powerful beings,he's looking for the most tenacious of them dummy!

But to your lying lips, he said.. to hire the most tenacious, "MOST" powerful beings in the universe to stop you. and you are just stupid enough to think the word most is carried over to the word powerful when separated by a comma. Smh.