It really doesn't matter because if those beings that were shown in up in the sky is some of the most powerful beings in DC, then DC is weaker than I thought. No one in that entire book showed any power over Herald level. Its a statement that is obviously false, not something thats factual unless I really need to prove this by making threads of characters from the book vs Doomsday or Darkseid, or Anti-Monitor.
Originally posted by carver9you’re saying that no one there is over herald level then want to vs them against DS and anti monitor 2 legit multiversal + entities? Smh.
It really doesn't matter because if those beings that were shown in up in the sky is some of the most powerful beings in DC, then DC is weaker than I thought. No one in that entire book showed any power over Herald level. Its a statement that is obviously false, not something thats factual unless I really need to prove this by making threads of characters from the book vs Doomsday or Darkseid, or Anti-Monitor.
Originally posted by JBLwhat kind of backwater, hillbilly trailer trash school do you send your kid to?
Lol. I made it my business to pick my son up from school today. And low and behold, I asked a teacher and showed her that statement. This is how she explained it... For the sake of argument let's take 100 people. All 100 are tenaciouss and powerful. Now take the words tenacious and powerful, now out of those two words he want a certain attribute. Now to get that attribute he has to highlight something to show what he wants. We already know that they are tenacious and powerful, all 100 of them, but he want the most tenacious of The 100. So for the sake of argument let's say 50 of them are the most tenacious. By him inserting the word most in front of tenacious, he separated the group, just like the comma separated the two attributes. Without the word most, both attributes are equal. But by inserting the word most in front of tenacious, tenacious now become the more dominant attribute because it has now become enhanced. So bentley, go back to school.
Originally posted by carver9
It really doesn't matter because if those beings that were shown in up in the sky is some of the most powerful beings in DC, then DC is weaker than I thought. No one in that entire book showed any power over Herald level. Its a statement that is obviously false, not something thats factual unless I really need to prove this by making threads of characters from the book vs Doomsday or Darkseid, or Anti-Monitor.
Then again Carver, these are entities that were available to be fetched with vast resources. I'd assume that more powerful entities like the Anti-Monitor are not precisely active at any given time within DC so you cannot persuade them to join your cause easily. Starro would put entire galaxies into turmoil by just being there and he's what, trans?
Originally posted by Bentley
Ok, so I'm going to check that for sake of loving the arts and come back to yoou after checking with a few experts in semantics. Maybe your point stands, we'll see it can be a honest confusion from my partThe result of my review probably doesn't change a lot of the end meaning of your argument though as you'd be searching the "most tenacious" exclusively among powerful beings and even if tenacity is the core focus of your research, you are still solely considering the powerful. It's not as if you could measure tenacity in a way that you are going your way to pick less powerful individuals with "more" tenacity than others.
So my specialist agreed and pointed me towards this page:
Knowledge is a reward on itself
Originally posted by HumbleServant
Boxing gauntlet. No rest or recovery. Speed equalized1. Namor
2. Aquaman
3. She Hulk
4. Superboy
5. Power Girl
6. Hercules
7. Blue Marvel
8. Thor
9. Gladiator
Using Superman benching the Earth feat then he one shots
Namor, Aquaman, She Hulk, Superboy, Power Girl, and Blue Marvel.
Using the chain feat the he one shots Hercules, Thor, and Gladiator and neither can phase him too much.
Also, Superman can bench press the Earth for 5 days in the absence of his power source. I doubt any of these fights will take more than a few minutes at best. But it's safe to say that stamina will not play a part here.
Originally posted by carver9Saved. 👍🏻
It really doesn't matter because if those beings that were shown in up in the sky is some of the most powerful beings in DC, then DC is weaker than I thought. No one in that entire book showed any power over Herald level. Its a statement that is obviously false, not something thats factual unless I really need to prove this by making threads of characters from the book vs Doomsday or Darkseid, or Anti-Monitor.
Bump
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Source of what? It's not canon, period. it was a rehash of a Walmart one off story
Originally posted by abhilegend
Batman 100 page giant was in continuity.Why would Superman one be out of continuity?
Batman Universe/Walmart Batman stories are canon as it confirmed in The DC Comics Encyclopedia New Edition
"He(Vandal Savage) duelled Batman and host of heroes across time and space to recover a mysterious Faberge Egg containing a white Lantern Power ring"
https://i.ibb.co/r0VyVL6/3.jpg
Originally posted by StyleTimeYou can't take anything Stilt says seriously.
If Stilt was writing the comic, Superman and Thor would trip and impale themselves before their fight starts, followed by their books being cancelled forever.And Aquaman gets mentioned as suffering some terrible fate off panel.
Originally posted by JBLlmao this is not how grammar works
Lol. I made it my business to pick my son up from school today. And low and behold, I asked a teacher and showed her that statement. This is how she explained it... For the sake of argument let's take 100 people. All 100 are tenaciouss and powerful. Now take the words tenacious and powerful, now out of those two words he want a certain attribute. Now to get that attribute he has to highlight something to show what he wants. We already know that they are tenacious and powerful, all 100 of them, but he want the most tenacious of The 100. So for the sake of argument let's say 50 of them are the most tenacious. By him inserting the word most in front of tenacious, he separated the group, just like the comma separated the two attributes. Without the word most, both attributes are equal. But by inserting the word most in front of tenacious, tenacious now become the more dominant attribute because it has now become enhanced. So bentley, go back to school.
also, further evidence that your son does not exist. This is not how teachers teach grammar to students, let alone parents of students who are popping in to school with questions about comic books.
but it is REALLY weird that your go-to move to fabricate support for a stupid position is to make up a story about your son.
