Better feat

Started by abhilegend30 pages

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
😂 The star and Hulk carry weight as not only is it stated he is carrying the weight of one, it also states the spear was made from a star trapped in distorted space time.
By your logic, we can also state that the Hulk survived the heat of a star in this feat, simply because it's a star. No one does because we know it's only the weight that is specified for the spear.

So where is the common sense there?
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
You're an idiot, you need a strong magnetic field and high temperature to do it so having the mass of a star doesn't seem like an absolute requirement:

https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/nuclear-fusion-power.aspx?

Fusion scientists have developed methods that are able to heat plasma to temperatures of 150 million degrees Celsius. There exists no material however that can contain plasmas at such unimaginable temperatures. So, different plasma confinement methods are used by fusion scientists. One of them is the magnetic confinement wherein the hot plasma particles are contained in a magnetic “cage” made by strong magnetic fields which prevent the particles from escaping. For energy production this plasma has to be confined for a sufficiently long period for fusion to occur.
https://www.euro-fusion.org/fusion/fusion-on-earth/

😂 COMPLETE clown.


😂

In case for stars to start hydrogen-helium fusion there needs to be enough mass to collapse it into such heat that it automatically starts fusion sequence.

All stars begin their lives from the collapse of material in a giant molecular cloud. These clouds are clouds that form between the stars and consist primarily of molecular gas and dust. Turbulence within the cloud causes knots to form which can then collapse under it's own gravitational attraction. As the knot collapses, the material at the center begins to heat up. That hot core is called a protostar and will eventually become a star.

The cloud doesn't collapse into just one large star, but different knots of material will each become it's own protostar. This is why these clouds of material are often called stellar nuseries – they are places where many stars form.

As the protostar gains mass, its core gets hotter and more dense. At some point, it will be hot enough and dense enough for hydrogen to start fusing into helium. It needs to be 15 million Kelvin in the core for fusion to begin. When the protostar starts fusing hydrogen, it enters the "main sequence" phase of its life.

https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/objects/stars1.html#:~:text=It%20needs%20to%20be%2015,into%20helium%20in%20their%20cores.

Your very link says this.

https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/nuclear-fusion-power.aspx?

On the Sun, the process of fusion is driven by the Sun’s immense gravitational force and high temperatures. But the Earth does not have the immense gravitational force required to confine the hydrogen nuclei. So a different approach is needed to achieve fusion reactions on Earth.

The magnetic cage fulfills the role of gravitational force which makes sure that the atoms don't escape after they are heated.

A magnetic cage
Fusion scientists have developed methods that are able to heat plasma to temperatures of 150 million degrees Celsius. There exists no material however that can contain plasmas at such unimaginable temperatures. So, different plasma confinement methods are used by fusion scientists. One of them is the magnetic confinement wherein the hot plasma particles are contained in a magnetic “cage” made by strong magnetic fields which prevent the particles from escaping. For energy production this plasma has to be confined for a sufficiently long period for fusion to occur.

Same is said here.

https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/nuclear-fusion-power.aspx?

In the Sun, massive gravitational forces create the right conditions for fusion, but on Earth they are much harder to achieve.

You are an absolute clown, you ****ing neanderthel.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
None of this proves a thing, I cleared it up with the EAST Reactkr going on, but temporarily.

It proves that you're wrong, and that when you're wrong, you won't admit it (like with Superboy Prime and the time he spent).

Most modern reactors use fusion technology, you said.

You named....one experimental reactor that, as I pointed out (and you didn't acknowledge) only operated for a few unknown seconds.

So go on. You said most of the modern ones use fusion tech. Give stats. 60%? 70%? 95%? What do you define as 'modern' - last five years? Last year?

Not yet built😂 ?

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
It proves that you're wrong, and that when you're wrong, you won't admit it (like with Superboy Prime and the time he spent).

Most modern reactors use fusion technology, you said.

You named....one experimental reactor that, as [b]I pointed out (and you didn't acknowledge) only operated for a few unknown seconds.

So go on. You said most of the modern ones use fusion tech. Give stats. 60%? 70%? 95%? What do you define as 'modern' - last five years? Last year?

Not yet built😂 ? [/B]

Current and Planned. Like I mentioned way earlier, fission is the dominant technique used, while modern reactors ( I put it in the last 5-10 or planned within scope since saying next year futuristic is a bit far reaching, but that's IMHO) are planned to use fusion techniques.
But that's just in discussion. the fusion technique/requirements STILL doesn't change.

Originally posted by abhilegend
So where is the common sense there?
😂

In case for stars to start hydrogen-helium fusion there needs to be enough mass to collapse it into such heat that it automatically starts fusion sequence.

https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/objects/stars1.html#:~:text=It%20needs%20to%20be%2015,into%20helium%20in%20their%20cores.

Your very link says this.

https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/nuclear-fusion-power.aspx?

The magnetic cage fulfills the role of gravitational force which makes sure that the atoms don't escape after they are heated.

Same is said here.

https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/nuclear-fusion-power.aspx?

You are an absolute clown, you ****ing neanderthel.

What a dumbass, if you go by this irl physics whose main argument is based on gravity, you should also admit that he has certain level of gravitational pull which doesn't exists for this character. 😂

How's he consuming all matter if gravitational pull is not there, troll?

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Current and Planned. Like I mentioned way earlier, fission is the dominant technique used, while modern reactors ( I put it in the last 5-10 or planned within scope since saying next year futuristic is a bit far reaching, but that's IMHO) are planned to use fusion techniques.
But that's just in discussion. the fusion technique/requirements STILL doesn't change.

Ahhhh I see.

So 'most' nuclear reactors that are current(i.e. last 5-10 years)/planned within scope) are fusion reactors, are they?

Please show how you arrived at this. You named 1 reactor, and 1 experimental that isn't even built yet 😂

Here is a hint to get you started: 2019 alone saw 5 reactors come online, none were fusion.

Here is a list of upcoming plants:
https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/plans-for-new-reactors-worldwide.aspx

None of them are fusion 😂

But please, tell me how 'most' modern reactors are fusion 😂 I want to see how far we get before you simply admit you were wrong. You KNOW I will keep at this.

Originally posted by abhilegend
How's he consuming all matter if gravitational pull is not there, troll?

We've seen that gravitational argument happen so many times that should be a natural super power at this point for large objects

Here is a miniature sun.

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/295987-scientists-create-miniature-sun-in-wisconsin

Not to mention, the living "star" says he will reclaim matter into him but that doesn't mean at this point he has enough gravitational pull to do it.
His mass would increase the more be "reclaims" matter into him which would increase his pull and so on.
It's like a chain reaction.
If he really had mass of a star there would be significant evidence of that, period.

ZERO confirmation from author and ZERO EVIDENCE of him having the mass of a star.
Him having the property of a star doesn't mean he has equal mass to an actual star.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Ahhhh I see.

So 'most' nuclear reactors that are current(i.e. last 5-10 years)/planned within scope) are fusion reactors, are they?

Please show how you arrived at this. You named 1 reactor, and 1 experimental that isn't even built yet 😂

Here is a hint to get you started: 2019 alone saw 5 reactors come online, none were fusion.

Here is a list of upcoming plants:
https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/plans-for-new-reactors-worldwide.aspx

None of them are fusion 😂

But please, tell me how 'most' modern reactors are fusion 😂 I want to see how far we get before you simply admit you were wrong. You KNOW I will keep at this.

😂 And this proves what exactly?

Nice 👆

That doesn't look like a very heavy star, I can't believe it weighed Hulk down.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
ZERO confirmation from author and ZERO EVIDENCE of him having the mass of a star.
Him having the property of a star doesn't mean he has equal mass to an actual star.

😂 And this proves what exactly?

That you are wrong, and it confirms your behaviour when you are called out.

LMAO You didn't prove me wrong, ever, not ONE time on the forums, what is all this gibberish about? 😂

I stopped responding because nothing you said was relevant that i didn't address already. Nothing i ever say is up for dispute

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
LMAO You didn't prove me wrong, ever, not ONE time on the forums, what is all this gibberish about? 😂

I stopped responding because nothing you said was relevant that i didn't address already. Nothing i ever say is up for dispute

Ok, so please address how you arrived at 'most modern reactors use fusion technology'.

Also, please address this:

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Ok, so please address how you arrived at 'most modern reactors use fusion technology'.

Also, please address this:

Refer to my posts above for the answers, nothing more.

Whether you wanna be ignorant to protect your ego and think I was wrong on the counts, the fusion technique /requirements still doesn't change.

But you never addressed how you arrived at the word 'most'.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Here is a miniature sun.

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/295987-scientists-create-miniature-sun-in-wisconsin

this is naturally occurring?

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Refer to my posts above for the answers, nothing more.
Trollberto about to run?

Just admit it, you had to perform an extensive Google search to respond to my post. You called me a clown but made yourself look like a complete idiot because that proved my post went well over your empty skull.

Instead of owning up to your mistake you’re just making yourself look more of a retard.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Sure, a neutron star is much larger and has roughly the mass of the sun. Larger the star, the more the mass.
Last Sun is nowhere close in size, so he doesnt have the mass of one. Unless specifed that he has the mass of one, he doesnt. He only has the hydrogen helium core.

LMAO what? NOWHERE is it said he is as dense as a star either.

Supermans words were "a living star, hrdrogen and helium" literally implying the core of one. That's why they started targeting that. 😂

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
😂 And YET the Last Sun is NOWHERE close to the size of a building, let alone a city. So unless its STATED that he is as dense or has the mass of one, he doesnt have the weight of a star period.

LMAO I already dismantled your post, you didn't even respond to this after that but yeah i def "ran" 😂