Originally posted by Scribble
^ This thread shows that there are at least two actual fascists on KMC
they broke into a federal building as a mob and threatened the lives of our legislators. supporting the rule of law in this situation is not "fascism". but i'm sure you just earned lots of brownie points at discord/voltron chat for that, so enjoy basking in that attention. oh and don't forget to report me 80 times for "harassment" again for responding to your baiting. what's your mental illness exactly? does it contain the word "borderline" by any chance?
oh look. another "fascist":
Originally posted by BackFire
The party of law and order.Trump supporters: “Look at me, I’m antifa now”
They’re trying to breach the inner chambers now and there’s an armed standoff. Police may rightfully open fire soon.
Originally posted by Superdad76
we can - not let any one storm our buildeng to stop an electionthat is fasicm
im so angry
agreed, it was certainly an attempted fascist coup, incited directly by the president and his son. anyone who argues otherwise is an obvious clown who should be ignored. [the below post, for example]
Originally posted by Bashar TegSaying "police should defend the Capital Building" (they should, the rioters getting that far in is an absurd security breach) is different from saying that people deserve death for their actions post-event.
they broke into a federal building as a mob and threatened the lives of our legislators. supporting the rule of law in this situation is not "fascism". but i'm sure you just earned lots of brownie points at discord/voltron chat for that, so enjoy basking in that attention. oh and don't forget to report me 80 times for "harassment" again for responding to your baiting. what's your mental illness exactly? does it contain the word "borderline" by any chance?oh look. another "fascist":
Non-fascists tend to prefer non-violent results, instead of thirsting for blood. Thirsting for blood is incredibly authoritarian imo. There was a mob of violent insurgent-types, but I also saw random beer-belly dads who were caught up in the moment, taking pictures at podiums and stuff. Do they "deserve a bullet"?
I'm not playing into your personal attacks, Bash, and I don't see why you would jump to such nastiness at the drop of a hat. We've already been through our nonsense and there's no need to get back into that. It's completely off-topic.
Originally posted by Neon1234I believe there were guillotines brought out a few times in the summer riots through America. I think they took one to an Amazon office or something.
It's the Left that's been calling for guillotines for the Right and the wealthy for years now.But now it's a big deal.
What a joke.
I think evoking the guillotine is indeed cringey, but I understand the sentiment either way. The thing about them evoking the guillotine yesterday though is that they're obviously excluding Trump and his team, which makes the gesture pointless. If you want a French-style revolution, you don't choose the half of the aristocracy that you like and give them a free pass.
I suppose whoever set that guillotine up wasn't smart enough to realise that, though.
i see all that anger last summer about CHOP ? ?
which i agree with
but now i see all you babys saying its ok because trump said its ok to do it ?
what ?
what was the aim ?
over throw our election and CHOP the electers ?
how are you diferent from the ANTIFA trump was lieing about
trump and his trumpmedia lied to you . accept it and stop burying my country pls
Originally posted by ScribbleI don't think that really matters.
I believe there were guillotines brought out a few times in the summer riots through America. I think they took one to an Amazon office or something.I think evoking the guillotine is indeed cringey, but I understand the sentiment either way. The thing about them evoking the guillotine yesterday though is that they're obviously excluding Trump and his team, which makes the gesture pointless. If you want a French-style revolution, you don't choose the half of the aristocracy that you like and give them a free pass.
I suppose whoever set that guillotine up wasn't smart enough to realise that, though.
If they set up a guillotine, they are joking around with the idea that they will execute those that disagree with them.
Maybe you are right, but I doubt every instance with a "guillotine" is inferring to the French Revolution. Even if it was, its scary other "intents" would still be valid points.
Originally posted by Neon1234It is freaky because that is exactly how countries in history get overtaken and ruled by the opposite party.
It's the Left that's been calling for guillotines for the Right and the wealthy for years now.But now it's a big deal.
What a joke.
They joke about doing something, and then they do it when they are in the position to make the decisions.
Originally posted by victreebelvictrI tend to assume that guillotine imagery (I doubt the protestors from yesterday had a real, functioning one, but who knows) is indicative of an overthrowing of government / violent revolution. But usually it's a people's revolution. So who are they going to install as the people's leader? Trump? That'd literally be replacing the government with... the government.
I don't think that really matters.If they set up a guillotine, they are joking around with the idea that they will execute those that disagree with them.
Maybe you are right, but I doubt every instance with a "guillotine" is inferring to the French Revolution. Even if it was, its scary other "intents" would still be valid points.
Maybe they were just trying to be intimidating and didn't really think it through that much, idk.
Originally posted by ScribbleI think that might be one of the intents, but I doubt it is the only one.
I tend to assume that guillotine imagery (I doubt the protestors from yesterday had a real, functioning one, but who knows) is indicative of an overthrowing of government / violent revolution. But usually it's a people's revolution. So who are they going to install as the people's leader? Trump? That'd literally be replacing the government with... the government.Maybe they were just trying to be intimidating and didn't really think it through that much, idk.