Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
👆 Thanks
Nah you were wrong.
Originally posted by -Pr-
It wasn't ignored. I said a similar thing in the post, if you'd read it.
It's not a legit feat, you can argue it's not confirmed they one-shotted the whole thing. Apparently, they destroyed a planet at a time, starting with the one they boomtubed on, Salaak's.
fragments of planets being left also makes it questionable.
Too many interpretation for it, what vendetti said is irrelevant.
Originally posted by -Pr-👆 Orion and the golem fought , And the fight blew apart a star system is basically what happens in that scene and it just another trope in comics. The writer just wants to show how powerful those characters are even though the golem is definitely the more powerful one.
All right.From what I can see, the issues seem to say: Orion and the Golem fought, and the result was the destruction of a star system. Vendetti's tweet on the matter does help reinforce that too. Not that it really matters, though, as it's not really quantifiable. There seems to be a real disparity in their power levels, so what, are we supposed to think Orion destroyed 30% of a solar system? 40%? 20%? It doesn't work. It's just "I want to show how powerful characters are without using real world numbers" writing, which we do see a lot of in comics.
If I missed something that adds context, though, people can feel free to post it.
What's the issue with Orion, though? Dude's a legit herald and has been for years.
==
Also, the hostility in this thread needs to be taken down several notches. You're not children. Stop ****ing acting like it.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Nah you were wrong.It's not a legit feat, you can argue it's not confirmed they one-shotted the whole thing. Apparently, they destroyed a planet at a time, starting with the one they boomtubed on, Salaak's.
fragments of planets being left also makes it questionable.
Too many interpretation for it, what vendetti said is irrelevant.
How is any of what you just said, relevant to the point I made?
That's not up to you.
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Reasons? It seems Pr and I basically said the same thing
Originally posted by -Pr-
How is any of what you just said, relevant to the point I made?That's not up to you.
Kyle saw the destruction of planets after they were shattered/fragmented. Not the same thing as one-shotting the whole System at once and reducing it to dust.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Kyle saw the destruction of planets after they were shattered/fragmented. Not the same thing as one-shotting the whole System at once and reducing it to dust.
Originally posted by -Pr-
How is any of what you just said, relevant to the point I made?That's not up to you.
Originally posted by -Pr-
All right.From what I can see, the issues seem to say: Orion and the Golem fought, and the result was the destruction of a star system. Vendetti's tweet on the matter does help reinforce that too. Not that it really matters, though, as it's not really quantifiable. There seems to be a real disparity in their power levels, so what, are we supposed to think Orion destroyed 30% of a solar system? 40%? 20%? It doesn't work. It's just "I want to show how powerful characters are without using real world numbers" writing, which we do see a lot of in comics.
If I missed something that adds context, though, people can feel free to post it.
What's the issue with Orion, though? Dude's a legit herald and has been for years.
==
Also, the hostility in this thread needs to be taken down several notches. You're not children. Stop ****ing acting like it.
Thanks Pr, I appreciate your input on the subject. From the little information that what was displayed on panel, I could not see the collision that the author claims to have occurred. What I saw was Orion being assaulted, driven back by that same omni blast, and using a Boom Tube to flee. I did not see him add anything to the attack, as it did not look like a physical attack. Kyle's statement on the matter didn't seem relevant because he wasn't actually there when the confrontation occurred. His statement appeared to be more of an assumption which then lead to a question that Orion does not answer. That is what I read.
Since you've given a ruling, this topic can move onward and away from where it has been for several pages.
The feat itself is unquatifiable per your ruling, unless I understood you wrong?
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Kyle saw the destruction of planets after they were shattered/fragmented. Not the same thing as one-shotting the whole System at once and reducing it to dust.
Okay? I never said it was destroyed in one shot. Just that it was destroyed by their fight, which the comic and the writer state. I don't see the problem.
Originally posted by Stoic
Thanks Pr, I appreciate your input on the subject. From the little information that what was displayed on panel, I could not see the collision that the author claims to have occurred. What I saw was Orion being assaulted, driven back by that same omni blast, and using a Boom Tube to flee. I did not see him add anything to the attack, as it did not look like a physical attack. Kyle's statement on the matter didn't seem relevant because he wasn't actually there when the confrontation occurred. His statement appeared to be more of an assumption which then lead to a question that Orion does not answer. That is what I read.Since you've given a ruling, this topic can move onward and away from where it has been for several pages.
The feat itself is unquatifiable per your ruling, unless I understood you wrong?
It wasn't a ruling, just an opinion. Just fyi. But yes, I would consider it to be unquantifiable.
Originally posted by -Pr-
Okay? I never said it was destroyed in one shot. Just that it was destroyed by their fight, which the comic and the writer state. I don't see the problem.It wasn't a ruling, just an opinion. Just fyi. But yes, I would consider it to be unquantifiable.
The comic never stated anything, all Kyle did was make an assumption. Kyle wasn’t there to see it.