Originally posted by ilikecomics
What do you think are the bad parts ?
Environmental damage/pollution in the pursuit of the last penny. What mega corporations like DuPont get away with to earn their shareholders that extra half percent. While a small business owner can go out of business for a single violation.
Capitalism can/does further inequality as not everyone is born with the same opportunities and it tends to favor those born with the most. Look at Reagan's policies and what they did to the wealth gap in America and our middle class.
Originally posted by Robtard
Environmental damage/pollution in the pursuit of the last penny. What mega corporations like DuPont get away with to earn their shareholders that extra half percent. While a small business owner can go out of business for a single violation.Capitalism can/does further inequality as not everyone is born with the same opportunities and it tends to favor those born with the most. Look at Reagan's policies and what they did to the wealth gap in America and our middle class.
Have you considered that the companies who pollute and still exist only do so as benefactors of an incestuous relationship with the state ?
For example the covid lockdowns resulted in the largest redistribution of wealth from the lower and middle class to the upper class. Look at how good apple and Nike did during the lockdowns while almost a quarter of small businesses shut down.
Do you think inequality is intrinsically bad ? For example I'm not equal with NBA players, in terms of athletic ability, is that bad ?
Originally posted by Klaw
I like how people are against Capitalism, but have a net worth in the millions.
I remember Russell Brand discussing this. He said when he was poor, discussing the bad aspects of capitalism meant he was just jealous of rich people. When discussing it after he became rich he was derided as a virtue signalling champagne socialist. It was like they just didn't want to address his point.
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I remember Russell Brand discussing this. He said when he was poor, discussing the bad aspects of capitalism meant he was just jealous of rich people. When discussing it after he became rich he was derided as a virtue signalling champagne socialist. It was like they just didn't want to address his point.
The poor have more to gain from capitalism than they ever could from socialism.
The poorest of the poor in America have more access to food and health care than Kings did 300-400 years ago.