Originally posted by ilikecomics
What specific beliefs does he have that makes you think this ?This is him addressing these misrepresentations of his views.
In 2017 I pretty much exclusively commented on the cbvf so no I didn't. I also don't think using the term nignog would make me look too smart. However, even If I did use a racial slur it wouldn't mean I follow a specific pro white, anti minority paradigm.
Oh dude, rob and all other TDS leftists think anyone who believes strongly in individual freedom over collectivist BS or who loves their country or believes in strong border control or who doesn't want their kids brainwashed and indoctrinated with racist CRT-type shit is a "white supremacist".... can't believe you haven't learned that about them by now.
Basically, everyone they don't like is a "racist" or "white supremacist".... my advice to you, don't take them seriously and don't expend too much of your energy and time replying to them.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Oh dude, rob and all other TDS leftists think anyone who believes strongly in individual freedom over collectivist BS or who loves their country or believes in strong border control or who doesn't want their kids brainwashed and indoctrinated with racist CRT-type shit is a "white supremacist".... can't believe you haven't learned that about them by now.
I do know that, but I like asking questions to deconstruct that association.
Originally posted by ilikecomics
I don't think talking to anyone is a waste of time really, even if they disagree.
Well, considering the fact that they never argue in good faith and always use disingenuous arguments and will basically think you're a racist or white supremacist just for holding opposing political views to themselves it seems like a waste of time and energy to me to engage with them too deeply but suit yourself.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Well, considering the fact that they never argue in good faith and always use disingenuous arguments and will basically think you're a racist or white supremacist just for holding opposing political views to themselves it seems like a waste of time and energy to me to engage with them too deeply but suit yourself.
I think it's worth it because when I first came to the gdf I was an edge lord atheist and thought you were ridiculous, I now no longer think that and think we have more in common than not. So maybe you're 1/1000 where my approach works, but I'd argue it's worth it.
Plus if I give a good argument against lefty be the others who see those arguments can employ them.
But to be sure this is not a hill I'd die on and eventually experience will probably curb my optimism.
Originally posted by ilikecomics
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQEarly twin studies of adult individuals have found a heritability of IQ between 57% and 73%,[6] with the most recent studies showing heritability for IQ as high as 80%.[7] IQ goes from being weakly correlated with genetics for children, to being strongly correlated with genetics for late teens and adults. The heritability of IQ increases with age and reaches an asymptote at 18–20 years of age and continues at that level well into adulthood. However, poor prenatal environment, malnutrition and disease are known to have lifelong deleterious effects.
Would explain the junk food industry. Deliberate attempt to dumb down society.
No doubt the concept of "Kosher Foods" was kept up well into a modern age to prevent their own from eating the destructive junk we Gentiles feed out children.
Originally posted by cdtm
Would explain the junk food industry. Deliberate attempt to dumb down society.No doubt the concept of "Kosher Foods" was kept up well into a modern age to prevent their own from eating the destructive junk we Gentiles feed out children.
Junk food is a result of state tampering with our food. I e. Protectionism of corn farmers leading to corn syrup in everything.
Originally posted by ilikecomics
Why do you attempt to talk to them if you feel how you say you feel ? Do you do it to strictly troll ?
I sometimes troll them back when they troll me, yeah. This place is just a distraction to my real life. The more energy and time I expend replying to trolls the less I have to use in my real life.
I'm getting to be an old man (50; technically, not really that old but sometimes it feels like it) and I just don't have the energy I used to to put up with all of their silly games which is why I have a lot of them on ignore.
The only time I usually engage with them too deeply is when I'm on the toilet taking a shit lol. Any other time I reply to them is in-between doing other things in my life like when I'm cooking or get up to get a snack or take a piss while gaming or watching YouTube.
Life is just too short imo to waste much of it engaging with trolls.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
I sometimes troll them back when they troll me, yeah. This place is just a distraction to my real life. The more energy and time I expend replying to trolls the less I have to use in my real life.I'm getting to be an old man (50; technically, not really that old but sometimes it feels like it) and I just don't have the energy I used to to put up with all of their silly games which is why I have a lot of them on ignore.
The only time I usually engage with them too deeply is when I'm on the toilet taking a shit lol. Any other time I reply to them is in-between doing other things in my life like when I'm cooking or get up to get a snack or take a piss while gaming or watching YouTube.
Life is just too short imo to waste much of it engaging with trolls.
Fair enough. That's probably better for your mental health because as vox day says sjws always lie and they always double down.
Originally posted by ilikecomics
IQ is 80 percent genetic by the time you're a teenager, so that's simply not true.
Robert Plomin, a deputy director of the MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Center at King’s College London, responds -snip
Genes make a substantial difference, but they are not the whole story. They account for about half of all differences in intelligence among people, so half is not caused by genetic differences, which provides strong support for the importance of environmental factors. This estimate of 50 percent reflects the results of twin, adoption and DNA studies. From them, we know, for example, that later in life, children adopted away from their biological parents at birth are just as similar to their biological parents as are children reared by their biological parents. Similarly, we know that adoptive parents and their adopted children do not typically resemble one another in intelligence. -snip
Researchers are now looking for the genes that contribute to intelligence. In the past few years we have learned that many, perhaps thousands, of genes of small effect are involved. Recent studies of hundreds of thousands of individuals have found genes that explain about 5 percent of the differences among people in intelligence. This is a good start, but it is still a long way from 50 percent. -snip
Another particularly interesting recent finding is that the genetic influence on measured intelligence appears to increase over time, from about 20 percent in infancy to 40 percent in childhood to 60 percent in adulthood. -snip
But sure, keep pushing that failed scientific racism theory, Ziggy. Arthur de Gobineau would be so proud of you.