XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
The Immortal Emperor
Mandrakk eating stories doesn't make him beyond the Source, because the Source is the blank page, 'God', who sent Mandrakk from outside story to investigate the story inside of it. He was corrupted and turned into the entropy of the very concept of story -- but not before he created the Thought Robot -- the most powerful idea in creation that is capable of becoming as powerful as he needs to be to defeat anybody. The ultimate defender. Mandrakk and the Thought Robot/Superman are the ultimate concepts of the Overvoid. The ultimate duality of the very concept of story and not story.Perpetua, like Manhattan, are just mechanism through which story is developed. With negative energy [Crisis/Reboot energy] or with positive energy [Anti-Crisis/Legacy energy]. By characters believing in good. By characters believing in bad. By characters being selfish. By characters being selfless. But all of those mechanisms -- all of those ways to tell the story, are still ultimately intrinsic to the concept of story itself -- of which Mandrakk came outside from, in contact with, and became its ultimate hyper-devourer. Perpetua using the Final Crisis events with Darkseid/Mandrakk for her own purpose doesn't negate any of this.
Alright, so in order to dissect this comparison between Mandrakk and Perpetua, I think it’s first important to note how the Morrison and Snyder cosmologies portray “God” and the implications they have on the impressiveness of these characters.
The way you’re looking at this, Phil, is taking Mandrakk as he was portrayed under Morrison’s cosmology, then looking at Perpetua through the lens of Morrison’s cosmology to place Mandrakk above her, without actually looking at how Snyder portrays “God” or “the ultimate concept” (which is much different than the way Grant does it) and how Snyder fits Mandrakk and Perpetua in that context. I think either way, Perpetua is far above Mandrakk or Thought Robot, but let’s look at how God is portrayed under Morrison and under Snyder before I bring in Perpetua/Mandrakk.
God under Morrison
As you said, in Morrison’s cosmology, The Overvoid is the unfathomable mind of God, untouched by story or duality. It first becomes aware of itself when it notices the DC Multiverse and defines itself in relation to this story-generating Multiverse. Interestingly enough, when the concept of the Overvoid is introduced by Morrison, it is said that upon the discovery of the DC Multiverse, Mar-Novu (Monitor) and Mobius (Anti-Monitor) are born from the Overvoid (i.e. they are also born from “outside story” and enter the story), with these two entities acting as “the opposite, the conflict generator, the story-machine.” This description makes it sound as though Mobius and Mar-Novu, like Mandrakk, are aspects of the Overvoid, specifically the Overvoid being split into 2 by being introduced to the concept of story.
It is said that this “schism” that occurred as a result of the birth of Monitor and Anti-Monitor left the Overvoid “in shock”, and it quickly sought to contain the spread of the flaw, and thus prevent the loss of its own non-duality. It then sends Dax Novu to investigate, after which Novu is contaminated by duality and split into Mandrakk and Thought Robot.
https://imgur.com/a/OM81z50
My understanding of the Monitors under Morrison based on the above scan and description is as follows:
Overvoid: The non-dual, limitless mind of God.
Monitor/Anti-Monitor: Extensions of the non-dual, limitless mind of God that were born as a result of it being introduced to the concept of story and embody the concept of story.
Mandrakk: Extension of the non-dual, limitless mind of God that feels threatened by the concept of story and seeks to eliminate it.
Thought Robot: Extension of the non-dual, limitless mind of God that seeks to protect the concept of story.
There aren’t really any indications that one of these concepts is superior to the other. Mandrakk/Thought Robot may seem superior to Monitor/Anti-Monitor here in the sense that while they are embodiments of story born from God, Mandrakk and Thought Robot in a sense are “manipulators of story” and have a sort of “meta-understanding” of the concept of story as a result of being born outside of it.
The issue comes from the fact that the concept of story (i.e. the DC Multiverse) under Morrison has profound power over the Overvoid. It’s not a one way street where Monitor-Mind and its extensions are just infinitely beyond the Multiverse and the concept of story. Being introduced to the concept of story left God “in shock” and caused it to split into Monitor and Anti-Monitor, and Dax Novu being introduced to the concept of story caused him to split as well. Instead of just excising the concept of story from its perfection, the Overvoid had to bottle the DC Multiverse and prevent its spread, as well as send probes to study it. All of the Monitors in DC under Morrison are beings who came from “outside of story” and became part of the story.
What that means is that Mandrakk fundamentally is an extension of the Overvoid that became part of the concept of story (specifically the part of the Overvoid that felt threatened by story) and could be influenced by the concept of story. Once a character reaches the Overvoid (i.e. outside of the story), they are erased utterly and cannot interact with the story at all. So either the character is in the story and can be influenced by the story, or they simply do not exist at all. Mandrakk being a consumer of story within the story does not make him beyond the concept of story, as there are various cosmic threats within DC that have threatened to destroy the concept of story.
I think Anti-Monitor and Barbatos are good examples of this. AM is literally an extension of the Overvoid that sought to (and was capable of) destroying all stories in DC forever and leave the Anti-Matter universe as supreme for all of eternity. Barbatos was bringing stories into existence that were never supposed to become stories, and as a result was destroying the Dreaming, which would have destroyed “all stories forever”:
So AM and Barbatos were both beings within the story (with AM originating from outside the story) that sought to consume all stories, forever.
Another question you have to be asking yourself is: How would Mandrakk’s shenanigans help Perpetua? If Mandrakk was operating as a consumer of story on a meta-scale beyond what AM and Barbatos were doing and encompassed Perpetua’s domain in terms of what Mandrakk sought to destroy, why would Perpetua be whispering in Mandrakk’s ear egging him on? If Mandrakk succeeded, Perpetua would be destroyed too, no?
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/GH5ZrJbAWPYTmRLRX7CG0ON05EFb-WGCplkCUUs0p7YbB773SD9DXSSrYShByy9aqvR5yodWH6_MwIG_WNM1P8k6hINjuEbcBFz-2p2L75eZb4YSw4ZjxO-8NZVGxj4CkxNkclZ7Zg=s1600
This scan actually confirms that Mandrakk himself was using crisis energy. Crisis energy is described here as energy based on selfishness, greed, and predation, the latter two literally being some of the words Morrison uses to describe the concept that Mandrakk embodies. The scan then proceeds to explain how Perpetua whispered into the ears of “whoever might hear her” so that she may “instigate crises”, while showing Mandrakk on the page (i.e. he is part of what is being described in the scan). So Mandrakk is an embodiment of crisis energy that Perpetua whispered to and egged on to help instigate (i.e. “bring about or initiate) a crisis.
Again, if Mandrakk’s shenanigans were meant to involve consuming Perpetua’s domain, she would not have egged him on and stoked further greed and selfishness within him.