Brauer College asks male students to "apologize" for their gender.

Started by Klaw2 pages

Originally posted by StyleTime
The son is 12 years old, according to internet searches. I listened to the audio interview on the OP's article, and I agree with the mother and the interviewer.

I think the school had good intentions, but that was a dumb move. Teaching the students about consent is good and should happen. The "stand up and apologize" segment serves no meaningful purpose though, and frames the kids as predators by nature.

Oh it served a meaningful purpose, making men appear evil, and women innocent and good.

Originally posted by StyleTime
The son is 12 years old, according to internet searches. I listened to the audio interview on the OP's article, and I agree with the mother and the interviewer.

I think the school had good intentions, but that was a dumb move. Teaching the students about consent is good and should happen. The "stand up and apologize" segment serves no meaningful purpose though, and frames the kids as predators by nature.

How does the school have good intentions?

Good intentions is just Leftists way of making their racism and/or sexism not look as bad as it is.

This culture war stuff seems so Trump era. 🙂

Originally posted by SquallX
How does the school have good intentions?

Indeed.

I have some experience with how dysfunctional these places are, having been to college.

A friend of mine was raked over the coals by administrators. His crime? Being punched in the face and refusing to press charges.

See, the guy who hit him happened to be the son of a major illuminati. Big doner. When my friend got hit, called the police, and didn't press charges, they went full in blaming him for provoking it. Made him go to psychological evaluations, and when he complained they confronted him with little booklets of university "laws".

So he did some research, learned he can press charges any time he wants for a year or so, arranged a meeting, and with their little books on school laws informed them if they didn't drop the ultimatums and leave him alone to finish out his degree in peace, he planned to press charges.

Extortion, essentially. But it worked. They left him alone.

What a bunch of assholes.

Too many chiefs "men" not enough Indians "women"

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
This culture war stuff seems so Trump era. 🙂

Spot on!

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
This culture war stuff seems so Trump era. 🙂

You do know trump is not President right?

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
This culture war stuff seems so Trump era. 🙂

It is arguably what got him elected in the first place.

Originally posted by SquallX
You do know trump is not President right?
Don't use the words "you now know"
https://spankbang.com/1csr8/video/riley+reed+cuckolding+you

In reverse you'd hear know now you

Originally posted by SquallX
How does the school have good intentions?

It was an assembly addressing sexual assault, harrassment, and consent. They wanted to educate the students on how to respect each other's personal boundaries. This is a good thing, and a worthwhile pursuit for schools. It's only how the assembly ended that caused the problem

It was well-intentioned, but they failed to stick the landing.

Originally posted by cdtm
This is the tone set my many activists.

This is why you get push back. Because too many people really do believe unearned privilage equates to guilt. Sit down, shut up, listen, and don't argue is pretty awful for creating open dialogs.

But great for rallying the base.


Sometimes, you should just listen though.
Originally posted by Klaw
Good intentions is just Leftists way of making their racism and/or sexism not look as bad as it is.

No, it's acknowledging a good motivation while also acknowledging flaws in execution. Again, having the assembly is fine. It's just the apologizing part that was dumb.
Originally posted by cdtm
Indeed.

I have some experience with how dysfunctional these places are, having been to college.


"College" has different meanings in Australia. These weren't college students as we understand them in the U.S.

Brauer College covers what would be 7th-12th grade in America. It would be a combination middle and high school here.

Originally posted by StyleTime
It was an assembly addressing sexual assault, harrassment, and consent. They wanted to educate the students on how to respect each other's personal boundaries. This is a good thing, and a worthwhile pursuit for schools. It's only how the assembly ended that caused the problem

It was well-intentioned, but they failed to stick the landing.

Sometimes, you should just listen though.

No, it's acknowledging a good motivation while also acknowledging flaws in execution. Again, having the assembly is fine. It's just the apologizing part that was dumb.

"College" has different meanings in Australia. These weren't college students as we understand them in America.

Brauer College covers what would be 7th-12th grade in America. It would be a combination middle and high school here.

When people say exactly brain goes

"Eggs actly. Why can't the one with the eggs use dem legs for once. Then you realize that of course that's the whole point! Your gender has the sea men, so of course life 🧬 is going to meaner on you, because you are your gender!"

This guy

I agree. Eggs are plotting against us tbh. People should be skeptical when their next omelette arrives.

Originally posted by cdtm
This is the tone set my many activists.

This is why you get push back. Because too many people really do believe unearned privilage equates to guilt. Sit down, shut up, listen, and don't argue is pretty awful for creating open dialogs.

But great for rallying the base.

My problem with this statement is you get push back no matter what. We've seen this in America with the police brutality protests. Where the group that needs to help make change has decided the problem doesn't even exist.

That being said I don't disagree with this idea. Having young boys acknowledge that their gender may help them get a head and that they need to be a generation of change to me is not that bad of an idea.

But it only works if you give the children a well enough explained reason why they are performing the action itself. Without that they just get confused on why they are doing something.