Can Superman replicate Gladiator's crossing galaxy feat

Originally posted by Diesldude
blatant hypocrisy. The chains feat, remember that the was lying, the chains were breakable because Superman broke them lmao.

And here it’s proven that heimdall didn’t need to blink, nor galaxy’s have to be crossed in order to surprise him.

I mean distance doesn’t matter if you want to surprise someone.

They are also stuck on light needing hours to catchup but Superman travelled billions of light years, trillions in a matter of moments. Since they can’t get their head around this, they are either trolling or not worth having an intelligent conversation with.

It’s hyperbole from an unseen villain with no proof but said villains word. it’s a one off plot device, that fanboys spun into a feat. The whole book was a mind**** that fell apart at the end. Nothing about the "chains" is a feat, no amount of denial changes that.

Originally posted by Prof. T.C McAbe
Light needs hours to catch up is the same writer misunderstanding as this feat of flash

Writers make mistakes. Superman has better speed feats, especially now that his pre crisis feats are canon again.

So yes, superman can replicate this feat and even suprass it. Gladiator is the fastest one in Marvel though, except maybe for the Buried Alien.

Nice one.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
It’s hyperbole from an unseen villain with no proof but said villains word. it’s a one off plot device, that fanboys spun into a feat. The whole book was a mind**** that fell apart at the end. Nothing about the "chains" is a feat, no amount of denial changes that.

Nice to see you've changed your stance about villain's statements.

Originally posted by Diesldude
I’ll make it easier to understand.

How many suns did Superman get amped by while flying to WF?

Simple question.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
And so on and so on it goes 😂

Originally posted by -Pr-
Nice to see you've changed your stance about villain's statements.

My stance has always and will always be consistent with Superman. Just like how that "moon feat" still isn't combat applicable, nor does he has dynamic strength.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
My stance has always and will always be consistent with Superman. Just like how that "moon feat" still isn't combat applicable, nor does he has dynamic strength.

Except that you used to use villain statements as proof in the past. And you can feel free to think those things. You're wrong, but people are allowed to have opinions of course.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Except that you used to use villain statements as proof in the past. And you can feel free to think those things. You're wrong, but people are allowed to have opinions of course.

What are you talking about? I said it's hyperbole cuz there's ZERO proof that the metal is what the unseen villain says and it’s never been used since.

It's hyperbole simply because unbreakable only implied to previous people who tried to break it and since it's a very little list unbreakable seems a bit hyperbole also used to pull what stars? Stars come in all different sizes. There's no proof of anything about the chains. Period.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Except that you used to use villain statements as proof in the past. And you can feel free to think those things. You're wrong, but people are allowed to have opinions of course.

I don’t know how the villain telling us that the chains are made to haul stars is a hyperbole statement.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Except that you used to use villain statements as proof in the past. And you can feel free to think those things. You're wrong, but people are allowed to have opinions of course.

Also, no. I'm not wrong, you think it's "combat applicable" when it was physically impossible to put a planet back together so we have no idea what he did to fix it, or how, and as suxh the speed of the feat is secondary to the HOW. Gladiator was faster, even if the Superman feat was more complex.

So how do you feel about the hyperbole of Hulk holding the weight of a star from a villain claim?

Originally posted by Juntai
So how do you feel about the hyperbole of Hulk holding the weight of a star from a villain claim?

It's impossible that it was the weight of a star but we accept the impossibility because it's comics not science. Only hateful trolls like Quan make up their mind and won't accept any other possibility except that their object of hate has to be discredited and lowballed by any means possible. And you don't feed trolls, just ignore them and laugh about their impotence and incompetence.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
What are you talking about? I said it's hyperbole cuz there's ZERO proof that the metal is what the unseen villain says and it’s never been used since.

I don't recall disputing that.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Also, no. I'm not wrong, you think it's "combat applicable" when it was physically impossible to put a planet back together so we have no idea what he did to fix it, or how, and as suxh the speed of the feat is secondary to the HOW. Gladiator was faster, even if the Superman feat was more complex.

Yes, you are wrong. Any complex motion that isn't just moving in a straight line, is combat speed. End of.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I don't recall disputing that.

Yes, you are wrong. Any complex motion that isn't just moving in a straight line, is combat speed. End of.

Except it isn't. because Flash can run through a maze at top speed and if he doesn't fight anyone, all he did was travel. Combat speed implies combat, which is a wholly different set of reflexes than simply moving very fast, even in a complex pattern.

It's why Slade, who is absolutely faster than a human, still has trouble dealing with Batman, Nightwing, and Batgirl/Orphan, who are not.

Superman assembled a moon. he was basically solving a puzzle, but problem solving is only part of a fight. It was absolutely a high-speed feat for a complex task, but Flash literally does that all the time and no one calls it combat.

No amount of head canon will make it "combat applicable"

😂

And what about dynamic strength,Pr? 😈

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
😂

And what about dynamic strength,Pr? 😈

Now I wonder how often he got beaten up in a fight.

Someone just used Batman’s reflex speed as a way to argue someone isn’t fast

Batman of all people. The guy that will dodge omega beams when Flash can’t dodge it despite being a faster lol

Originally posted by Diesldude
it takes longer for albie to throw a punch than to identify the right jigsaw puzzle piece, locate it from a bunch of others, pick it up and then insert in the right spot. We all know albie is slow so he might never find the right piece without help. That means he never landed a punch.

Now I wonder how often he got beaten up in a fight.

Hey, if flash dodges a bullet that someone fires at him it's combat reflex because the bullet is used in a combat situation. However, if someone fires bullets into the desert, flash runs, collects them and puts them back in the magazine in exact the same order they left it, it can't be used as a combat feat because it was a non combat situation. dur

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Except it isn't. because Flash can run through a maze at top speed and if he doesn't fight anyone, all he did was travel. Combat speed implies combat, which is a wholly different set of reflexes than simply moving very fast, even in a complex pattern.

It's why Slade, who is absolutely faster than a human, still has trouble dealing with Batman, Nightwing, and Batgirl/Orphan, who are not.

Superman assembled a moon. he was basically solving a puzzle, but problem solving is only part of a fight. It was absolutely a high-speed feat for a complex task, but Flash literally does that all the time and no one calls it combat.

No amount of head canon will make it "combat applicable"

First of all, your example is flawed. I said "complex motion". Running around a maze is not the same thing as knitting a sweater or making a sandwich.

Second of all, I said "any complex motion". That applies to doing things that aren't violent, but on this forum, they're still evidence of combat speed. And we both know if this was any Marvel character you wouldn't have the tiniest problem with it.

Use better logic and examples instead of being so broken. Seriously, it's getting tiring dealing with someone that never acts in good faith.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
😂

And what about dynamic strength,Pr? 😈

Superman has dynamic strength, just like a bunch of other characters. The comics have said so multiple times. People saying he doesn't are just biased haters.