He-Man and Masters of the Universe: Revelation (Netflix)

Started by cdtm11 pages

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
I'm happy you revealed this publicly so that any claims on your part that you ACTUALLY liked the series purely for its entertainment was false.

Angering "INCELS" is the highlight of any well-made television series.

Rob would make a funny Roger Ebert.

"The story was non existent, the jokes fell flat, the acting was awful, and the effects looked like something a college student could do with a 2001 computer, but the incels were angered.

Two thumbs up for Ghostbusters!

Originally posted by Robtard
I literally said it was an "okay show" and that I'd watch a 3rd part in the post you just read. I initially gave it a 6.5 out of 10, now it's a solid 7 after part two, slight improvement, but still just okay.

Learn to read, okay?

What do these words mean to you?

Best part of this cartoon reboot is still hearing all the incels and overly sensitive males go nutty over a children's cartoon because some of the female characters did some stuff. Well played, Netflix. Well. Played.

In your language does "BEST" mean INSIGNIFICANT, SECONDARY, MINOR?

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
What do these words mean to you?

[b]Best part of this cartoon reboot is still hearing all the incels and overly sensitive males go nutty over a children's cartoon because some of the female characters did some stuff. Well played, Netflix. Well. Played.

In your language does "BEST" mean INSIGNIFICANT, SECONDARY, MINOR? [/B]

😆 BURN!

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
What do these words mean to you?

[b]Best part of this cartoon reboot is still hearing all the incels and overly sensitive males go nutty over a children's cartoon because some of the female characters did some stuff. Well played, Netflix. Well. Played.

In your language does "BEST" mean INSIGNIFICANT, SECONDARY, MINOR? [/B]

Seems like you think "best part" means the rest can't be good, when it can. The words you're looking for are "only good part", which I didn't say.

You're very dumb. So dumb.

ps Keep raging over a children's cartoon because a couple of the female characters did some stuff

Don't think it was still a children's cartoon after that seduction scene.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Don't think it was still a children's cartoon after that seduction scene.

👆 😂

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Don't think it was still a children's cartoon after that seduction scene.

Is the rating not still "Family"? Wasn't aware.

Originally posted by Robtard
Seems like you think "best part" means the rest can't be good, when it can. The words you're looking for are "only good part", which I didn't say.

You're very dumb. So dumb.

ps Keep raging over a children's cartoon because a couple of the female characters did some stuff

ROBTARD IS A FRAUD!!!

And now MOTU REVELATIONS is a CHILDREN'S CARTOON?

😆

I guess that is a ringing endorsement of the "CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT" and "DEPTH" involved in Smith's writing given your description.

Originally posted by Robtard
Is the rating not still "Family"? Wasn't aware.

No idea lol. Just not a scene id put on in front of little ones. Think theyd prefer the new kiddish one anyway.

FYI I wasnt in anyway justifying the anti-woke freak out from the supposed “fans”.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
No idea lol. Just not a scene id put on in front of little ones. Think theyd prefer the new kiddish one anyway.

It's rated "PG", which means "parental guidance", meaning there may be material not suitable for very young children in some parents eyes.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
No idea lol. Just not a scene id put on in front of little ones. Think theyd prefer the new kiddish one anyway.

FYI I wasnt in anyway justifying the anti-woke freak out from the supposed “fans”.

Ratings are pretty much meaningless. The line slips and slides so much, you can squeeze into PG with all kinds of things that would never have passed years ago, yet be considered R for something as so stupid now that no one ever thought anything of.

Case in point, The Conjuring:

R ratings often hinder box office returns, and many studios push hard for PG-13 ratings that typically bring in millions more. Horror is a particularly profitable genre with a hugely loyal fan base. Combine the two things, and you're likely to rake in the cash unless the MPAA hits you with an R. After scaring audiences with his Insidious franchise, horror maestro James Wan set out to make a "true life" haunted house flick set in the 1970s about Ed and Lorraine Warren, the paranormal investigators who worked on the infamous Amityville case. The Perrons seek out the Warrens after weird things start happening in their New England farmhouse._

Despite no language, nudity, or gore, The Conjuring still received an R because, in the words of producer Walter Hamada, the MPAA felt the film was "just so scary. There are no specific scenes or tone you could take out to get it PG-13." Wan said he was aiming for a PG-13 rating, but he didn't seem to mind receiving an R, even though a lot of internet critics took the MPAA to task for it. The Conjuring_whipped up more than_$319 million worldwide. The R rating and the reasoning for it might have even given it a boost, honestly.

Read More: https://www.grunge.com/83893/movies-rated-r-strange-reasons/?utm_campaign=clip

With logic like that how can one even take these rating seriously?

Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
[B]ROBTARD IS A FRAUD!!!

And now MOTU REVELATIONS is a CHILDREN'S CARTOON?

😆

I guess that is a ringing endorsement of the "CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT" and "DEPTH" involved in Smith's writing given your description. [/B]

It is rated PG you dummy

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Don't think it was still a children's cartoon after that seduction scene.

It is suggestive, but not explicit. They are both fully-clothed, and she sits on his lap.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
It is suggestive, but not explicit. They are both fully-clothed, and she sits on his lap.

I mean certainly not something wed get in the 80s or even the 2000s series.

Regular Skeletor looked better than Uber-Skeletor. As in, I thought he looked cooler. The action figure line should be quite good I reckon.

Originally posted by samhain
Regular Skeletor looked better than Uber-Skeletor. As in, I thought he looked cooler. The action figure line should be quite good I reckon.

Think they were going for a 2013 comic series Eternity War look.

Regular was closer to the 2000 reboot look, I preferred it too.

Still loads better than Evil Lynn's amped form.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
I mean certainly not something wed get in the 80s or even the 2000s series.

Sure, but the audience for this one is not kids.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Sure, but the audience for this one is not kids.

Ya don't say.

Originally posted by Robtard

ps Keep raging over a children's cartoon because a couple of the female characters did some stuff

YouTube video

No surprises here, he didn't like it.

But Drinker brings up several valid points. One of the weaknesses of the finale was the main event vs the larger battle.

Spoiler:
There were no real stakes to be fought over, as the only real threat came from Evil Lynn.

What they needed was a side quest for everyone else. Something that would render Teela's victory moot, if it wasn't taken care of. The comic did this by having He-Man fight Skeletor in god form, while She-Ra destroyed the Eyes of Grayskull which were the source of his time and space manipulation powers.