Originally posted by SquallX
And how many Chinese civilians the Japanese soldiers beheaded just for fun again in WW2?You have this belief that nations are built through love and peace, when they are instead built through the slaughter of the weak.
Name me one powerful Nations that didn’t slaughter the weak to come into power?
You brought in the Middle East like it’s a bastion of peace. How many wars have they wage against each other?
Genghis Khan, Alexander the Great, Oda Nobunaga, Caesar, all conquerors that slaughtered thousands so they can make the World in their imagine, and so they can be remembered.
Very true. The british empire as well wasn't exactly so virtuous either. But I'm sure Scribble doesn't like to think about that.
Bottom line: we used the bomb (twice) because we were the ones to first get our hands on it and it was the quickest way to end war and it saved far more lives in the end than an invasion of Japan would've. Not to mention we gave the japanese a chance to surrender after telling them we had a deadly secret weapon and they refused, even after we used it the first time (so they knew we weren't bluffing) they still stubbornly refused to surrender.
If one of the other powers had gotten the bomb first you can bet that they would've used it as well under similar circumstances. Hell, the Axis powers probably wouldn't even have warned us that they had it before using it.
Not gonna get caught up in this BS yet again arguing in circles again over the morality of using the A-bombs. Frankly, it's retarded imo to argue that America was in the wrong in what they did especially after Japan attacked us unprovoked and killed so many Americans after pretending to be our friends for so long. I really think people who argue otherwise are just trolling.