My Ranking of KMC Members' Politics

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Yeah, I get it. You are too goddamn stupid as most lefties are here to grasp such a simple f***ing concept. Anarchy in it's truest form--that is, anarchy as an end in itself and not just something people engage in to tear down the system with the end goal of forming a new government like Communism-- is extreme right wing. Period.

Your childish little emojis won't ever change that you poor, gender confused dolt. You are just ignorant. The marxism type "anarchy" you are referring to is transient. It is not something people permanently want, dumbass.

Originally posted by Scribble
haermm

Yeah, I know.... I hurt your wittle fees fees.

You know, having to explain repeatedly such simple, common sense concepts to the mentally challenged just gives me a friggin' headache. Not just the anarchy thing, but also common knowledge stuff like why communism/socialism/marxism is bad lol...

So I've decided to just put scribble on ignore and be done with it. All he (and yes, he is a 'he' no matter how much he's deluded himself into thinking otherwise) does is reply with childish emojis and when he doesn't he deflects away from topic by bringing up my personal beliefs in a snarky manner so... yeah, he's on ignore now.

Originally posted by Scribble
There have been anarcho-syndicalist systems within Spain that were crushed under Franco, if that is somehow what he meant. Franco smashed the anarchists brutally, but they fought well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism_in_Spain
Haven't read enough Chomsky to comment, but I like the man generally.

You smart bastard.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
You know, having to explain repeatedly such simple, common sense concepts to the mentally challenged just gives me a friggin' headache. Not just the anarchy thing, but also common knowledge stuff like why communism/socialism/marxism is bad lol...

So I've decided to just put scribble on ignore and be done with it. All he (and yes, he is a 'he' no matter how much he's deluded himself into thinking otherwise) does is reply with childish emojis and when he doesn't he deflects away from topic by bringing up my personal beliefs in a snarky manner so... yeah, he's on ignore now.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
This is so easy to understand that it's sad for anyone who can't get it.

The political spectrum in it's most basic form is based on how much control a government has. Communism/totalitarianism (aka total government control) is on the extreme left. It's retarded to put anarchy on the same area of spectrum as communism, but then, most leftists are retarded so it' really no surprise they can't grasp such a simple concept.

Conservatives such as myself who believe in limited government can be described as far right but not as far on the right as anarchists who believe in zero government.

So I take it you believe in defunding the police then right?

Hopefully we see you at the next BLM rally.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
You know, having to explain repeatedly such simple, common sense concepts to the mentally challenged just gives me a friggin' headache. Not just the anarchy thing, but also common knowledge stuff like why communism/socialism/marxism is bad lol...

So I've decided to just put scribble on ignore and be done with it. All he (and yes, he is a 'he' no matter how much he's deluded himself into thinking otherwise) does is reply with childish emojis and when he doesn't he deflects away from topic by bringing up my personal beliefs in a snarky manner so... yeah, he's on ignore now.

😅

Originally posted by Blakemore
I watched some Chomsky videos, he mentions the Spanish revolution before the fascists took over.

You smart bastard.

It’s slightly baffling to me they didn’t join Mussolini or hitler in ww2. There’s so much history there, but the anarchism has my attention right now. Seems they still liked trade and respect towards their fellows, but still maintained a working system without the need of government.

Maybe Chomsky was right; they were on to something.

Yeah from what I know the jist of it is that trading still happens, people still create and distribute goods, but basic survival necessities (water, food, clothing, shelter) are provided and managed for all through communal mutual aid. That way people become able to exercise their liberty as they see fit without infringing on other people's liberties, and have more free time to do as they wish. It didn't work perfectly (why would any new system work perfectly straight out of the gate?) but I agree that they were onto something.

It's a shame that in Spain (Far-Right) Fascism crushed (Far-Left) Anarchy, but right-wing ideology is entirely centred around brutality and subjugation so it's not surprising, sadly.

It goes back to John Locke. Work with the earth and you have it. Trade with people and you can get other shit. Do some work, you are entitled to some reward… more shit you need or want. Just don’t take the piss and make sure other people can have some after they earn it, whatever it is.

In a sense, yes. But that's still along more classical liberal ideals than true anarchism, which tries to avoid potential of any form of monopoly (which leads to feudalism-type scenarios). But you're still mostly correct as I believe Locke influenced Proudhon, a very influential figure in all forms of anarchist thinking, as well as the first man to declare himself an 'anarchist'

Edit: I could be wrong about Locke influencing Proudhon. But I feel there's a certain trajectory of ideas going on there.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
his idealism is often impractical. He often doesn't provide alternatives and solutions. He is often just a problem bearer.

"You may say I'm a dreamer. But I'm not the only one." -Ringo Star

😛

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Yeah, I get it. You are too goddamn stupid as most lefties are here to grasp such a simple f***ing concept. Anarchy in it's truest form--that is, anarchy as an end in itself and not just something people engage in to tear down the system with the end goal of forming a new government like Communism-- is extreme right wing. Period.

Your childish little emojis won't ever change that you poor, gender confused dolt. You are just ignorant. The marxism type "anarchy" you are referring to is transient. It is not something people permanently want, dumbass.

Anarchism is a Far-Left ideology. Fascism is a Far-Right ideology. These are facts; you should accept them.

Originally posted by Robtard
"You may say I'm a dreamer. But I'm not the only one." -Ringo Star

😛

It's known that John and Paul stole everything from the Ringo. George was abused and kept his mouth shut.

You two sure do like blowin' each other lol.

trumpers are often mistaken for anarchists now, because of their enablement of far right terrorism, either openly or by selectively ignoring far right terrorists acts until they're forgotten, like the tulsa massacre. what they really support is fascist dictatorship (because they're cucks who need to feel dominated in order to feel safe). dictators of that type often require acts which promote anarchy in order to overthrow the current government (as said cucks tried to do on Jan 6). poor starflyofbrooklyn(etc), he doesn't understand nuance.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
You're referring to the status quo.
Look at all the social spending on the inept and retarded. The welfare state has a dysgenic effect, the free market has a eugenic effect.