Order by Durability

Started by Silent Master22 pages

Thor's feats have already been provided dozens of times in this and multiple other threads you've been involved in, so you pretending not to know about them is just you trolling.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Thor's feats have already been provided dozens of times in this and multiple other threads you've been involved in, so you pretending not to know about them is just you trolling.

I rebutted those feats. Rendering Thor with yet no suitable feats.
To reinstate the feats then you must effectively rebutt my rebuttal.

Originally posted by h1a8
He is by default. Characters get no special attributes without proof.

And yet Zod does ?

Oh wait we can powerscale ! Good so im still waiting for evidence that Hulk is physically superior to Thor.

No you didn't, you just claimed they were weak, because you don't like impressive Marvel feats.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
And yet Zod does ?

Oh wait we can powerscale ! Good so im still waiting for evidence that Hulk is physically superior to Thor.

Aircraft bullet scene and scene where he wins in a contest of strength. I stated this multiple times. Keep up troll.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No you didn't, you just claimed they were weak, because you don't like impressive Marvel feats.

Lying is not debating.
I gave the reasons why they were weak. I just didn't state they were weak without reasons. You have to rebut my reasons of why they were weak.
See I'm teaching you how to properly debate.

Originally posted by h1a8
Aircraft bullet scene and scene where he wins in a contest of strength. I stated this multiple times. Keep up troll.

He never took bullets. Striking power is not durability. Try again.

Prove Hulk is more durable than Thor.

Originally posted by h1a8
He is by default. Characters get no special attributes without proof.

Which means Zod has no special piercing resistance since he has zero feats to use as proof.

Originally posted by h1a8
Lying is not debating.
I gave the reasons why they were weak. I just didn't state they were weak without reasons. You have to rebut my reasons of why they were weak.
See I'm teaching you how to properly debate.

Then why do you keep doing it?

No, you gave your massively biased opinion on why you view them as weak.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
He never took bullets. Striking power is not durability. Try again.

Prove Hulk is more durable than Thor.

You are getting lost now. Please keep up.
My comment was in reply to you asking me to prove Hulk >>> Thor.
I gave two feats.
You get lost and say nonsense of Hulk never taking bullets and striking power?

You are an idiot for that.

Thor took at least 12 unrestricted ground-and-pound punches to the face from Hulk and suffered seemingly zero damage.

So it seems jet fighter rounds > Hulk's fist.

Not that I believe that myself.

Originally posted by h1a8
You are an idiot for that.

Sure thing forum clown.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Then why do you keep doing it?

No, you gave your massively biased opinion on why you view them as weak.

They still are reasons. You have to rebut why they aren't valid reasons. Just saying they aren't is not debating.

Originally posted by Robtard
Thor took at least 12 unrestricted ground-and-pound punches to the face from Hulk and suffered seemingly zero damage.

And dont forget Thor almost KOd Hulk with a single hit.

Originally posted by h1a8
They still are reasons. You have to rebut why they aren't valid reasons. Just saying they aren't is not debating.

Theres no rebutting a clown.

Ill offer you what I offered the last clown. You can Battlezone me on whether Thor is bullet proof to aircraft fire.

Accept or quit wasting everyones time on the topic.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
And dont forget Thor almost KOd Hulk with a single hit.

Thor was going to win that fight; why the Gamemaster stopped it. Didn't want his champion to take an L.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
And dont forget Thor almost KOd Hulk with a single hit.
Thor used a weapon, not his bare hands. Hulk used his hands. Also If the roles were reversed then Hulk would have resisted Thor's ground and pound better.

The fact remains that Hulk won in a contest of strength. He's stronger.
Aircraft bullet scene proves Hulk is more durable.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thor used a weapon, not his bare hands. Hulk used his hands. Also If the roles were reversed then Hulk would have resisted Thor's ground and pound better.

The fact remains that Hulk won in a contest of strength. He's stronger.
Aircraft bullet scene proves Hulk is more durable.

H1, dude, just stop. We all already know how stupid your arguments are, no need to keep digging a deeper grave for yourself.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Sure thing forum clown.

Clowns are funny.

That's some severe illness that prevents him from functioning normally.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Theres no rebutting a clown.

Then you lose the debate. And don't know how to debate.

If my arguments are weak then you should have the intelligence to rebut then (show the fallacy).