Originally posted by Silent Master
Thor's feats have already been provided dozens of times in this and multiple other threads you've been involved in, so you pretending not to know about them is just you trolling.
I rebutted those feats. Rendering Thor with yet no suitable feats.
To reinstate the feats then you must effectively rebutt my rebuttal.
Originally posted by Silent Master
No you didn't, you just claimed they were weak, because you don't like impressive Marvel feats.
Originally posted by h1a8
Lying is not debating.
I gave the reasons why they were weak. I just didn't state they were weak without reasons. You have to rebut my reasons of why they were weak.
See I'm teaching you how to properly debate.
Then why do you keep doing it?
No, you gave your massively biased opinion on why you view them as weak.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
He never took bullets. Striking power is not durability. Try again.Prove Hulk is more durable than Thor.
You are getting lost now. Please keep up.
My comment was in reply to you asking me to prove Hulk >>> Thor.
I gave two feats.
You get lost and say nonsense of Hulk never taking bullets and striking power?
You are an idiot for that.
Thor took at least 12 unrestricted ground-and-pound punches to the face from Hulk and suffered seemingly zero damage.
So it seems jet fighter rounds > Hulk's fist.
Not that I believe that myself.
Originally posted by Robtard
Thor took at least 12 unrestricted ground-and-pound punches to the face from Hulk and suffered seemingly zero damage.
And dont forget Thor almost KOd Hulk with a single hit.
Originally posted by h1a8
They still are reasons. You have to rebut why they aren't valid reasons. Just saying they aren't is not debating.
Theres no rebutting a clown.
Ill offer you what I offered the last clown. You can Battlezone me on whether Thor is bullet proof to aircraft fire.
Accept or quit wasting everyones time on the topic.
Originally posted by Darth ThorThor used a weapon, not his bare hands. Hulk used his hands. Also If the roles were reversed then Hulk would have resisted Thor's ground and pound better.
And dont forget Thor almost KOd Hulk with a single hit.
The fact remains that Hulk won in a contest of strength. He's stronger.
Aircraft bullet scene proves Hulk is more durable.
Originally posted by h1a8
Thor used a weapon, not his bare hands. Hulk used his hands. Also If the roles were reversed then Hulk would have resisted Thor's ground and pound better.The fact remains that Hulk won in a contest of strength. He's stronger.
Aircraft bullet scene proves Hulk is more durable.
H1, dude, just stop. We all already know how stupid your arguments are, no need to keep digging a deeper grave for yourself.