Order by Durability

Originally posted by Darth Thor
So you have nothing except your own head canon. As usual. Got it 👍

FYI Youre not interested in actual writers intention because if you were youd accept Thor took the full force of a star.

Whats the full force of a star?
How much force does a star push with?
1ton? 10 tons? Quantify it.
Does force melt metal?

Do you even know what the word force means?

Originally posted by h1a8
Whats the full force of a star?
How much force does a star push with?
1ton? 10 tons? Quantify it.
Does force melt metal?

Do you even know what the word force means?

Take it up with the writer. But quit being a hypocrite with your "writers intention" and "plot inconsistency" only when it suits your DC bias.

And no where in the film did it say the full force of a star would hit the metal. Only that THOR would be hit with that force.

The reason Hulk was picked to snap the IG gauntlet instead of Thor was because 1) Thor was seriously out of shape and not at his best and more so 2) because the radiation was "mostly gamma" and Hulk is "all about gamma radiation". This was literally spelled out to us in that scene.

Originally posted by Robtard
The reason Hulk was picked to snap the IG gauntlet instead of Thor was because 1) Thor was seriously out of shape and not at his best and more so 2) because the radiation was "mostly gamma" and Hulk is "all about gamma radiation". This was literally spelled out to us in that scene.

Yeah but mostly Thors emotional shape more than his physical. They didnt want his issues to screw up the Snap.

h1 hasn't seen the movie, so he didn't know about either of those things.

I asked him to prove Hulk is stronger than Thor and thats what he came up with facepalm

People, you are talking to a guy who thinks being able to shatter glass windows is somehow more impressive than stopping a leviathan with a single punch. Or that withstanding aircraft gunfire is more impressive than tanking a blast that destroys an entire city.

Originally posted by Silent Master
h1 hasn't seen the movie, so he didn't know about either of those things.

Name a single movie h1 has actually seen in his whole life.

I'll wait.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Yeah but mostly Thors emotional shape more than his physical. They didnt want his issues to screw up the Snap.

Very likely, but the gamma radiation aspect of the snap was the leading reason for picking Hulk over Thor. Hulk even says: "But the radiation's mostly gamma. It's like I was made for this."

Which really just tells us how f**king durable Thanos is, as he was seemingly harmed less than Hulk was in his first snap and there's nothing to suggest Thanos is gamma fueled.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
I asked him to prove Hulk is stronger than Thor and thats what he came up with facepalm

Hulk won in a contest of strength. I stated this multiple times. You always troll and ignore key statements said.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Take it up with the writer. But quit being a hypocrite with your "writers intention" and "plot inconsistency" only when it suits your DC bias.

And no where in the film did it say the full force of a star would hit the metal. Only that THOR would be hit with that force.

Why should I take it up with the writer? You are the one using it as a quantifiable feat. If you can't quantify to any degree of certainty or minimum then it's not a great you can use to support a claim of force.

Originally posted by Robtard
The reason Hulk was picked to snap the IG gauntlet instead of Thor was because 1) Thor was seriously out of shape and not at his best and more so 2) because the radiation was "mostly gamma" and Hulk is "all about gamma radiation". This was literally spelled out to us in that scene.

Originally posted by h1a8

Incorrect. Hulk was the toughest and had the best chance. That was the only thing spelled out. Stop making stuff up.

More proof that H1 hasn't watched Endgame.

Originally posted by h1a8
Incorrect. Hulk was the toughest and had the best chance. That was the only thing spelled out. Stop making stuff up.

Seeing as he listed the reason given in the movie for picking the Hulk, you're stating that your opinion >>>> the actual movie.

Originally posted by FrothByte
More proof that H1 hasn't watched Endgame.

He's seen it, low-level trolling move is to just ignore (or twist) things that are said/shown if they counter the angle you're pushing.

Bruce Banner : You saw what those stones did to Thanos, they almost killed him. None of you could survive.

Steve Rogers : How do we know you will?

Bruce Banner : You don't. But the radiation's mostly gamma. It's like I was made for this.

Still no proof that Thor can withstand aircraft bullets.
Zod is thus more durable.

Here is an added argument. Superman hit Zod way harder than Kurse hit Thor. Yet Thor bleed and was slightly dazed. Zod was perfectly fine.

Originally posted by h1a8
Still no proof that Thor can withstand aircraft bullets.
Zod is thus more durable.

Still no proof that Thor is vulnerable to aircraft bullet.
h1 is thus unable to prove his claim.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Still no proof that Thor is vulnerable to aircraft bullet.
h1 is thus unable to prove his claim.

He is by default. Characters get no special attributes without proof.

Originally posted by h1a8
He is by default. Characters get no special attributes without proof.

Yes and the special attribute that is being given to Thor is you claiming his is vulnerable to aircraft bullets despite having durability feats that dwarf AC bullets.

So by your own standards, the burden is on you.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes and the special attribute that is being given to Thor is you claiming his is vulnerable to aircraft bullets despite having durability feats that dwarf AC bullets.

So by your own standards, the burden is on you.

It is a special attribute to be resistant to damage.
It isn't a special attribute to be non resistant.

You have to prove that Thor has greater, but relevant, feats that dwarf AC bullets.

Originally posted by h1a8
It is a special attribute to be resistant to damage.
It isn't a special attribute to be non resistant.

You have to prove that Thor has greater, but relevant, feats that dwarf AC bullets.

Wrong, he has feats that are >>>>>> AC bullets, therefore your claim that he is vulnerable to AC bullets is the "special attribute" and thus requires proof.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Wrong, he has feats that are >>>>>> AC bullets, therefore your claim that he is vulnerable to AC bullets is the "special attribute" and thus requires proof.