Originally posted by Darth Thor
Of course he can. Just because he's been cut (as has Superman and Wonder Woman), doesn't mean they could resist what he did or that he could resist what they did.Have to compare like for like.
Why? Because he took punches from Superman? Thor has taken hits from Hulk, Hela, and Thanos without bleeding.
He certainly has superior heat resistance feats to them. Far far superior. Which of course is a massive durability feat even IF you want to say he just took the Heat and not the full force (for no other reason but that you don't like Thor having that feat).
Aside from him being in the line of fire of Ultrons quinjet fire (everyone else in the line of fire either jumped out of the way or died), he actually has a far superior feat of surviving ( in tact) the starship explosion, with him at the centre of the explosion.
Just stating that (on top of insults) doesn't make it true.
👆
Originally posted by Darth Thor
And apparently claiming you are winning a debate is all it takes to be winning in a debate.
Huh? Went over my head
Originally posted by FrothByte
Another opinion. Apparently, claiming your opinion is proof is all that's necessary to actually make it proof.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Saying your opinion is proof doesn't make it proof. it's still just your opinion. you have to actually provide proof..Since you haven't. you're losing the debate.
Saying something is an opinion is not proof that it is.
Anyone can call facts opinions.
Originally posted by FrothByteLooks like someone doesn't know that you must refute a claimed proof in order for it not to stand. Just saying, "that isnt proof", is not a rebuttal.
Looks like someone doesn't understand how burden of proof works. Actually, scrap that. Looks like somebody doesn't even know what proof is.
Originally posted by h1a8
Faulty logic. Bias individuals are bias.
Strange how everyone is bias except you.
Even Thor haters like Carthage have laughed off your idiotic arguments that Thor isnt bullet proof.
Robtard used to rate Hulk > Thor, but changed his views as more films (aka evidence) came to fruit.
But hey sure just sit there pretending youre the only Objective one. Just like you live in your own head canon.
Originally posted by h1a8
Looks like someone doesn't know that you must refute a claimed proof in order for it not to stand. Just saying, "that isnt proof", is not a rebuttal.
Refuting a proof is only possible when one actually provides some kind of proof to refute.
I see no proof here, just delusional opinions by a delusional poster.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Refuting a proof is only possible when one actually provides some kind of proof to refute.I see no proof here, just delusional opinions by a delusional poster.