Order by Durability

Following your logic. My argument is that you're a massive fanboy that lies in order to make sure his side wins. go ahead. refute my argument.

Originally posted by Robtard
The lowballing of Thor here is just silly trolling, Thor's feats speak for themselves:

Survived the exploding Bifrost without injury, was at ground zero

Survived the explosion at Sokovia without injury, was at ground zero

Tanked the "full force of a star" for couple minutes

Survived the power stone destroying the ship he was on (credit to Jaden)

All those feats that don't prove Thor can withstand aircraft bullets. Or a punch that will knock him up a skyscraper.

Originally posted by h1a8
You are arguing semantics.
I gave an argument. You have to refute the argument in order for it not to stand. Thats the only way. Just saying the argument doesn't prove the case is not a rebuttal.

We did refute your arguments. Multiple times. Every single poster in this thread has refuted your clearly made-up nonsense. You have no counter arguments. No further proof. Nothing above merely saying "Well, I disagree, therefore I must be right".

For example, this line is clearly said without any sort of proof:

"All those feats that don't prove Thor can withstand aircraft bullets. Or a punch that will knock him up a skyscraper."

Originally posted by h1a8
All those feats that don't prove Thor can withstand aircraft bullets. Or a punch that will knock him up a skyscraper.

^
Opinion

Originally posted by FrothByte
We did refute your arguments. Multiple times. Every single poster in this thread has refuted your clearly made-up nonsense. You have no counter arguments. No further proof. Nothing above merely saying "Well, I disagree, therefore I must be right".

For example, this line is clearly said without any sort of proof:

"All those feats that don't prove Thor can withstand aircraft bullets. Or a punch that will knock him up a skyscraper."

You haven't. Not once. You resulted to claiming i stated opinions.
I gave multiple reasons why those explosions ACTING ON THOR was weaker than an aircraft bullet would ACT ON THOR.

The key is: Acting on Thor.
Not acting on the island or bridge or ship.

Originally posted by Silent Master
^
Opinion

Originally posted by h1a8
I gave the facts to why earlier.

No, you gave your interpretations. you provided no in-universe explanations/facts.

Originally posted by h1a8
You haven't. Not once. You resulted to claiming i stated opinions.
I gave multiple reasons why those explosions ACTING ON THOR was weaker than an aircraft bullet would ACT ON THOR.

The key is: Acting on Thor.
Not acting on the island or bridge or ship.

And another whole bunch of opinions. Especially the first paragraph. Chock full of opinions.

Originally posted by h1a8
I gave the facts to why earlier.

Quit being idiotic.

Originally posted by FrothByte
And another whole bunch of opinions. Especially the first paragraph. Chock full of opinions.

Originally posted by h1a8
Irrelevant.
Calling arguments opinions is not a rebuttal. You have to prove that the conclusion doesn't necessarily follow from the premises I gave.

There's currently 21 pages worth of rebuttals to your opinions. You have yet to provide any single factual premise.

Originally posted by FrothByte
There's currently 21 pages worth of rebuttals to your opinions. You have yet to provide any single factual premise.

There isn't any rebuttals to my latest arguments. If there were then ill be doing a rebuttal.

Originally posted by h1a8
There isn't any rebuttals to my latest arguments. If there were then ill be doing a rebuttal.

And there's ^ another opinion. A delusional opinion in fact, as there were clearly dozens and dozens of rebuttals already provided.

Originally posted by h1a8
Irrelevant.
Calling arguments opinions is not a rebuttal. You have to prove that the conclusion doesn't necessarily follow from the premises I gave.

Calling opinions "facts" doesn't magically make them facts. you provided no in-universe proof.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Calling opinions "facts" doesn't magically make them facts. you provided no in-universe proof.

This is not a rebuttal to my argument. Therefore my argument still stands.

Originally posted by FrothByte
And there's ^ another opinion. A delusional opinion in fact, as there were clearly dozens and dozens of rebuttals already provided.

Originally posted by h1a8
This is not a rebuttal to my argument. Therefore my argument still stands.

This is not a rebuttal to my argument. Therefore my argument still stands.

Originally posted by h1a8
I argued reasons

This sums you up.

Originally posted by Silent Master
This is not a rebuttal to my argument. Therefore my argument still stands.