Order by Durability

Originally posted by FrothByte
Problem is you still haven't provided any feats to back up your claims.

I'll provide the feats.
Name a claim I made.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Prove his statement was wrong.

Originally posted by h1a8
I'll provide the feats.
Name a claim I made.

Prove that Zod has better cutting or energy resistance than Thor.

Oh, another huge durability feat for Thor can be seen in Thor (2011), he survived the massive explosion and release of energy of the exploding Bifrost without injury and he was at ground zero.

He still got zapped into retardedness by a little circle thingy.

That had the power of a billion, billion, billion Tsar Bombas behind it.

He pooped his armour when he got zapped and sat on his little throne on his little ship and still hadn't even wiped his balloon knot by that point and got a streak of jobbies on the seat.

The smell of it revived miek.

Do Asgardians even shit? Maybe they're like Kim Jong-un and use it all up as spent energy

.

Originally posted by Robtard
Do Asgardians even shit?

Originally posted by h1a8
Superman is relevant to the thread as is Hulk and all the characters and items who Thor's feats are based.

What Thor feats are based on Superman?

Originally posted by FrothByte
Prove that Zod has better cutting or energy resistance than Thor.

I said temperature, not energy.

Originally posted by Silent Master
What Thor feats are based on Superman?

Superman’s not in this thread.

Originally posted by h1a8
Zod is more resistant against being punched and aircraft bulletproof. Thor has been cut by random knives. Therefore, he is automatically more resistant against being cut.

I said temperature, not energy.

I thought you said you were going to post feats to back up your arguments? Where are they? All you're doing is repeating your arguments.

Also, are you therefore admitting that Thor has better energy resistance?

Originally posted by Robtard
Oh, another huge durability feat for Thor can be seen in Thor (2011), he survived the massive explosion and release of energy of the exploding Bifrost without injury and he was at ground zero.

Yeah was supposed to mention that one as well, but completely forgot.

Clearly that's not the same as taking a bullet though 😕

Originally posted by h1a8

Snapping someones neck doesn't prove stronger.
I replied to your lengthy post before you commented here. Did you miss it?

Yes it does. How else did he get him in a choke to begin with? Through superior technique against a soldier? Lmao quit being ridiculous.

I'm pondering whether your continued trolling is even worth responding to anymore.

Originally posted by h1a8
Zod proven that he is a close peer to Superman in MOS.

No he didn't. The moment Kal stopped holding back, Zod got his neck snapped.

And that by Noob Kal who was clearly still growing in power.

Ergo Your comparison sucks.

Originally posted by h1a8
huh? What's the purpose of that question?
You mean how is Superman related to Zod?

He isn't, you're just trying to derail the topic. how about you stick to Zod's feats.

Originally posted by Silent Master
He isn't, you're just trying to derail the topic. how about you stick to Zod's feats.

So Superman punching Zod hard without injuring Zod isn't a Zod feat? Zod showing himself to be a physical equal to Superman isn't a Zod feat?

We now know who the troll is.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Yes it does. How else did he get him in a choke to begin with? Through superior technique against a soldier? Lmao quit being ridiculous.

I'm pondering whether your continued trolling is even worth responding to anymore.

No he didn't. The moment Kal stopped holding back, Zod got his neck snapped.

And that by Noob Kal who was clearly still growing in power.

Ergo Your comparison sucks.

Giving a counterexample destroys the rule. A human can snap the neck of a stronger human. Vultrimites have gored stronger Vultrimites before. Therefore, your theory that Clark snapped Zod's neck because he's stronger is false. Zod sucked at fighting skill. Just look at all the times Clark manage to hit him. Foara showed much better skill.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Yeah was supposed to mention that one as well, but completely forgot.

Clearly that's not the same as taking a bullet though 😕

Nope it's not. Not even close. Captain America could have survived that. Conventional explosions (from explosives) are more impressive since the blast pressure sends shrapnel at speeds multiple times faster than a handgun bullet.
The speed in which everything expanded in that explosion proves the blast pressure was weak and the shrapnel was moving at speeds several times slower than a handgun bullet.

Originally posted by FrothByte
I thought you said you were going to post feats to back up your arguments? Where are they? All you're doing is repeating your arguments.

Also, are you therefore admitting that Thor has better energy resistance?

I gave feats. Zod being punched really hard without being injured. Thor being stabbed by a knife. Thor running away from aircraft bullets, etc.