Originally posted by snowdragonNo I didn't. I posted the fact check. You really have bought into the coolaid down at Voltron. Sorry about that.
It wasn't an argument facts were provided you edited presented facts. So in relation to that point, yes you picked out facts and edited the entire set of facts presented. Thanks, got it.
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!fact check, no more nor less.
Bad faith as usualalso fails to take into account location, demographics, criminal activity, poverty etc. etc. Silly try hard far right silliness covered in depths in a million threads here. Also you fail to mention most of those figures are debunked and false instead editing the post from the point where this is stated trying to pass them off as fact
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
No I didn't. I posted the fact check. You really have bought into the coolaid down at Voltron. Sorry about that.
Attack the poster not the post........ 😉
According to the FBI’s Expanded Homicide data from 2018, the most recent report of this kind Reuters was able to find ( here ), 80.7% of the murders of white people were committed by white offenders (2,677 of a total of 3,315) while 15.5% of the murders of white people were committed by Black offenders (514).The social media post also alleges white offenders committed 2% of the murders of Black victims. According to the FBI’s data, 8% of the reported murders of Black people were committed by white offenders (234 of a total of 2,925) and 88.9% by Black offenders (2,600)..
Well, I don't drink koolaid cuz it has to much sugar, try again. My point is address the situation honestly.
Originally posted by snowdragonfunny, that's what I thought you were doing.
Attack the poster not the post........ 😉Well, I don't drink koolaid cuz it has to much sugar, try again. My point is address the situation honestly.
Your data is irrelevant to my fact check or cdtm's post, you get that it's a whole another thing?
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
funny, that's what I thought you were doing.Your data is irrelevant to my fact check or cdtm's post, you get that it's a whole another thing?
Your fact check wasn't accurate you cut out the post that discussed the data related to the topic.........I already illustrated that by posting you missing figures. Address the facts as they were all presented, don't edit fact checks.......I didn't attack you, just how your misinformation was presented.
Originally posted by snowdragonNo, I used the part related to the false data cdtm had cut so it didn't appear false data. You understand that's what was being addressed, the original gaslighting post.
Your fact check wasn't accurate you cut out the post that discussed the data related to the topic.........I already illustrated that by posting you missing figures. Address the facts as they were all presented, don't edit fact checks.......I didn't attack you, just how your misinformation was presented.
Originally posted by snowdragonI did that mate, several times. You came in gaslighting. I'm surprised you want to push some generalised figures without context. 🙂
Address the post not the poster, time and again.......you did what you did own it and move on....yes salient...then highlight your point and show the rest of the fact check.Save your Koolaide.
Originally posted by marcssands14👆 it would seem so.
He drunk the whole damn pitcher of koolaid lol. Koolaid of misinformation/lies