More blacks kill white than whites kill blacks.

Just so it's clear: I have no problem with you guys posting studies or whatever. It's how they're presented that can be the issue.

All I did was post studies to factual information, all you did was ignore Whirlys race baiting bias posting.

You sir are an *******.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Just so it's clear: I have no problem with you guys posting studies or whatever. It's how they're presented that can be the issue.

Originally posted by Cdtm1
All I did was post studies to factual information, all you did was ignore Whirlys race baiting bias posting.

You sir are an *******.

Originally posted by samhain
Ah right. Yeah from what I've heard of that place the people there might be easily impressionable.

We're a simple folk; we just look at pretty pictures of muscular men and half naked ladies.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
We're a simple folk; we just look at pretty pictures of muscular men and half naked ladies.

Originally posted by Cdtm1
All I did was post studies to factual information, all you did was ignore Whirlys race baiting bias posting.

You sir are an *******.

Good way to get that ban extended indefinitely. What was the point of posting the baiting stats anyways? More confirmation bias?

Good to see certain people taking wikipedia as a credible source again.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Good to see certain people taking wikipedia as a credible source again.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
We're a simple folk; we just look at pretty pictures of muscular men and half naked ladies.

I've been doing that for decades, perhaps I'll check out your newsletter.

Originally posted by Cdtm1
All I did was post studies to factual information, all you did was ignore Whirlys race baiting bias posting.

You sir are an *******.

I've given Whirly plenty of shit in the past.

Also, what are you, 5? "I said he did it so you can't punish me for doing it". The **** even is that?

Who cares why you are banned now just to point out whirly lied in his posts to pretend defend against the topic and then went on to call out members as though calling out his lies is a problem.

‘I got banned for causing shit but so did whirly!’

I don’t know what kind of argument that is.

It's about fairness.

Originally posted by Klaw
It's about fairness.

Exaclty. Fair and proportionate response.

It's not about fairness, that's for babies seriously. It's about misconstruing information to fit what you want presented and than acting is if calling out that lie is somehow a bad system.

Exaclty. Fair and proportionate response.

Interesting

Originally posted by snowdragon
Who cares why you are banned now just to point out whirly lied in his posts to pretend defend against the topic and then went on to call out members as though calling out his lies is a problem.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
No he didn't but that's fine.

Well you presented a lie so there you go.

Originally posted by snowdragon
Well you presented a lie so there you go.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
No I didn't, but that's fine.