Originally posted by Duke Togo 2.0
Claiming hyperbole as a feat, and equating all instances of "faster than the eye" to be high-hypersonic is completely insane. It's almost as bad as saying that because sight is reliant on light? Then anyone who truly moves faster than it is FTL.
Not really. Robtard provided proof how fast one needs to be, to be invisible. And it's 38,000mph. Not FTL, lmao.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
It's clearly stated that he's faster than HugoHugo isn't faster than the human eye can follow.
The Cullens are. Unless you have proof human eyes in the Danner universe are different to human eyes in the Twilight universe, the Cullens are faster.
Thanks for your scan, really illuminating. 👆
Where is it stated? In the same exact instance where sound travels more quickly than he does? Prove that sound functions differently in Twilight than it does in real life. I'll wait.
Originally posted by Duke Togo 2.0
Where is it stated? In the same exact instance where sound travels more quickly than he does? Prove that sound functions differently in Twilight than it does in real life. I'll wait.
He's faster than the eye can see.
Hugo isn't.
But I see you are unable to prove it, so you're just answering with a request of your own.
I asked first, so go ahead.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Not really. Robtard provided proof how fast one needs to be, to be invisible. And it's 38,000mph. Not FTL, lmao.
Did you even read it? It says 70 meters in 1/250th of a second. It uses a baseball as a reference point. Not any feat in Twilight. This is not static. It's dependent of whether they actually moved 70 meters in that time-frame.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
He's faster than the eye can see.Hugo isn't.
But I see you are unable to prove it, so you're just answering with a request of your own.
I asked first, so go ahead.
He actually hasn't proven it. He needs to both show us an instance where they move faster than the eye but also where they move 70 meters in that same time-frame.
He has to prove it's not hyperbole too. Which is gonna be hard with all the subsonic feats.
Originally posted by Duke Togo 2.0No, he doesn't... we saw the films durmask
He actually hasn't proven it. He needs to both show us an instance where they move faster than the eye but also where they move 70 meters in that same time-frame.He has to prove it's not hyperbole too. Which is gonna be hard with all the subsonic feats.
Originally posted by Duke Togo 2.0
Did you even read it? It says 70 meters in 1/250th of a second. It uses a baseball as a reference point. Not any feat in Twilight. This is not static. It's dependent of whether they actually moved 70 meters in that time-frame.
Bella:
Unhindered by my skirt, it took only one long bound to reach the water’s edge. Just an eighty-fourth of a second, and yet it was plenty of time—my eyes and my mind moved so quickly that one step was enough. It was simple to position my right foot just so against the flat stone and exert the adequate pressure to send my body wheeling up into the air. I was paying more attention to aim than force, and I erred on the amount of power necessary—but at least I didn’t err on the side that would have gotten me wet. The fifty yard width was slightly too easy a distance. . . .
So she can travel 50yards in 1/84th of a second. That's a speed of 8594mph.
And Edward is faster:
He was faster than me. I couldn’t imagine how he moved his legs with such blinding speed, but it was beyond me.
There you go. Quantifiable numbers.
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
No, he doesn't... we saw the films durmask
No, you didn't. There's no instance where it's stated they move faster than the eye AND move 70 meters in that time-frame.
Distance is important as it drastically changes how fast the feat is. Assuming it's not hyperbole. The example used in the link Robtard decided to share doesn't actually happen in Twilight.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Bella:So she can travel 50yards in 1/84th of a second. That's a speed of 8594mph.
And Edward is faster:
There you go. Quantifiable numbers.
All that tells me is that your reading comprehension is atrocious. She is not talking about the fifty yard length of the river. She is talking about the edge near the water BEFORE she makes her jump over the river. That's the distance she moves in 1/84th of a second. A few paces.
Originally posted by Duke Togo 2.0
No, you didn't. There's no instance where it's stated they move faster than the eye AND move 70 meters in that time-frame.Distance is important as it drastically changes how fast the feat is. Assuming it's not hyperbole. The example used in the link Robtard decided to share doesn't actually happen in Twilight.
So your incredible proof for Danner's speed is this:
And YOU said:
He can cross distances of twenty miles in a few minutes. If it was just two minutes it would be 600 mph. If it was instead five minutes it would be 240 mph. Anything more than that really wouldn't fall under a "few" so I figure that's a good low to high end to use.
Good logic.
Now, Edward did:
I left Carlisle in the car, and ran back to Forks in a straight line through the sleeping forest. It look less time than the first journey in the speeding car. It was just minutes later that I scaled the side of her house and slid her window out of my way.
So he ran from Port Angeles, to Forks, in a straight line. That's about 45 miles.
Using YOUR logic, Edward ran approx 2x the distance, in the same time ("minutes"😉.
Edward is ~2x faster than Hugo's best feat, at least.
Originally posted by Duke Togo 2.0
All that tells me is that your reading comprehension is atrocious. She is not talking about the fifty yard length of the river. She is talking about the edge near the water BEFORE she makes her jump over the river. That's the distance she moves in 1/84th of a second. A few paces.
She covered that in 1 bound (guess you missed that 😛 ). And we know how far she can cover in 1 bound: 50 yards. Of course, she says 50 yards is 'easy', so her first bound could well have been 60 yards. She DOES say it was a 'long bound', so it HAS to be > 50 yards.
You are very convincing. Bella is much faster than 8594 mph. And Edward is still faster than her 🙂 My reading comprehension is pretty solid.
Here's the rest of the excerpt right before that:
"Are we swimming?" I asked him when we stopped beside the water.
I backed up five paces, just in case, and took a deep breath.
I began my first stride. And then stopped when the tight satin split six inches up my thigh. Alice!"
Six inches per pace.
64.00800 m/s or 143 mph.
Originally posted by Duke Togo 2.0
Here's the rest of the excerpt right before that:"Are we swimming?" I asked him when we stopped beside the water.
I backed up five paces, just in case, and took a deep breath.
I began my first stride. And then stopped when the tight satin split six inches up my thigh. Alice!"
Six inches per pace.
64.00800 m/s or 143 mph.
Yes? People CAN walk at different speeds, lol. But we know it took 1/84th of a second to take a long bound.
And 50 yards is slightly easy, so not a long bound.
Edit:not to mention, wut? Lol. 6 inches is how far her satin split, lmao.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Yes? People CAN walk at different speeds, lol. But we know it took 1/84th of a second to take a long bound.And 50 yards is slightly easy, so not a long bound.
Nope. That 1/84th a second bit was only referring to the distance she moved from those five paces to the water's edge. It wasn't referring to the jump across the river. That was you taking it out of context. As I've just proven for you.
Originally posted by Duke Togo 2.0
Nope. That 1/84th a second bit was only referring to the distance she moved from those five paces to the water's edge. It wasn't referring to the jump across the river. That was you taking it out of context. As I've just proven for you.
Erm....you proved nothing, and you're being a real Alberto right now lol.
6 inches is how far her satin split.