Debunking Old Earth Pseudoscience

https://youtu.be/7qW9AtoFCIw

The supposed earth age of 4.6 billion years old cannot possibly be accurate despite what mainstream "science" says.

Significant amounts of carbon 14 in diamonds alone debunk the billions of years supposed earth age. That isn't even taking into account things like the earth's magnetic field and comets and dozens of other things.

The scientists appearing throughout that video explain the many ways to prove the earth cannot possibly be billions of years old and also some ways to prove the universe as a whole can't be trillions, billions, or even just millions of years old.

*standby for incoming "ha ha ha ha you're so stupid and uneducated!" trolling coming from the triggered folk here who hate people debunking things that they've been suckered into believing throughout their whole lives*

If you actually debunked something for once, that would be nice.

@ethneo, how do you explain lead then?

http://apps.usd.edu/esci/creation/age/content/current_scientific_clocks/lead_isotopes.html

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
*standby for incoming "ha ha ha ha you're so stupid and uneducated!" trolling coming from the triggered folk here who hate people debunking things that they've been suckered into believing throughout their whole lives*

Talk about hypocrisy.

We really need a science forum.

We really don't ST. I can only imagine Methneo's threads.

Diamonds are one of if not the hardest substances on the planet so it is impossible to contaminate them yet they have significant amounts of carbon 14 in them.

That is impossible if they are truly billions or even just millions of years old but yet they are among the oldest things on earth.

If our solar system were truly as old as mainstream "scientists" say then we wouldn't still have comets flying around. They would've disappeared long, long ago.

Evolutionists try to explain this away by claiming there is an "Oort Cloud" outside our solar system that keeps making new comets which are deposited into our solar system thereby replenishing our supply of comets.

However, no one has ever seen this mythical "Oort Cloud" nor is there any other real proof it actually exists. It is clearly hypothetical/made up by evolutionists and/or old earthers in order to rescue their stupid theory of "billions of years"... hence, it's not actually scientific.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
However, no one has ever seen this mythical "Oort Cloud" nor is there any other real proof it actually exists.

Like God?

I'm not gonna go thru all of the ways to demonstrate that the earth and universe are nowhere near as old as mainstream "scientists" would have us believe because there are too many and it would take too damn long.

For anyone who wants to know more watch video inside link I posted above.

I'm sorry you all have been suckered into believing such a lie; one of the biggest lies ever pushed onto mankind.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae

However, no one has ever seen this mythical "Oort Cloud" nor is there any other real proof it actually exists.

Originally posted by Klaw
Like God?

oh boy! a retard fight! eat

I mean, ffs, the geologic column itself is not actually real. The only places it actually exists are inside the textbooks and inside evolutionists' minds.

Most of the people who have fallen for the "billions of years" lie also think that t-rexes "evolved" into chickens lol.

Yeah, that is such a huge improvement going from such a formidable apex predator into a meal at KFC. 😂 🤣 😆

Survival of the fittest!! 😂

Originally posted by Klaw
Like God?

1. The life of and miracles that Jesus Christ performed are a testament of God being real as is creation itself.

2. I nor any other creationist or Christian as far as I know has ever said the existence of God is scientifically provable.

The difference between the creationist and evolutionist is that we admit what we believe is faith-based while evolutionists make the boastful claim that their beliefs are "science" and taxpayers are even forced to pay for that totally unscientific shit to be taught to children.

Hence, the burden of proof is on evolutionists not creationists. 😉

And evolutionists and old earthers have failed royally in meeting the burden of proof. 🙂

I think the subject of origins should be left out of science classes completely because neither the creationists' nor evolutionists' claims of how humans came into the world are scientifically provable.

Both sides are basing what they believe on faith. Though of course I think there is far more evidence to support what my side believes.

4 in a row, back of the net Bash! 👆 😆

Well Mercury makes speed of time possible so that the universe could have been created 6,000 years ago and time expanded from there into history.

Originally posted by Wonder Man
Well Mercury makes speed of time possible so that the universe could have been created 6,000 years ago and time expanded from there into history.

Is Mercury real?

So you could have an ancient life for God in a 15 billion year old created 6,000 years ago universe.

The interaction of the plants is just being discovered. Stay tuned.

Methneo's sister must be on her period or doing a moon up at the county lock-up or something. The guy obviously has too much time on his webbed hands.