Debunking Old Earth Pseudoscience

Started by eThneoLgrRnae5 pages

...

Proof that the Oort Cloud Exists?

Thank you, indirect observational science

You gotta love atheists' double standards.

When it comes to God they love making the argument that since they can't see God then He doesn't exist but when it comes to a mythical comet-making "Oort Cloud" that no one has directly observed they call it "fact" or "science" just because heathen so-called "experts" tell them they know it exists (even though they've never actually seen it lol).

Oh atheists....

You're making a faulty comparison, we've witnessed the Kuiper belt, which would be somewhat similar in function to what astronomers believe how the Oort cloud works. Objects trapped in our Sun's gravitational field. Just MUCH further away.

We've not observed other gods in any actual form, to then conclude, 'our god likely exists'.

ps I'm not an atheist 🙂

This about sums it up:

Start logically. Look at what you can control. Then let it be free. That is what man stands for.

It's easy to assume no evidence exists to disprove your claims when you refuse to even acknowledge any arguments to the contrary.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
You gotta love atheists' double standards.

When it comes to God they love making the argument that since they can't see God then He doesn't exist but when it comes to a mythical comet-making "Oort Cloud" that no one has directly observed they call it "fact" or "science" just because heathen so-called "experts" tell them they know it exists (even though they've never actually seen it lol).

Oh atheists....


Again, you're confusing unverified with unsupported by evidence. The Oort cloud is unverified. God is unsupported by evidence.

It's true we haven't verified the Oort Cloud, but there's evidence suggesting it exists. The important thing is, we don't claim it as fact. Hell, maybe it ends up being something else. We're just saying the evidence points in that direction though....just like it did with Neptune and Pluto. We already understand how these systems work, and we can measure their effects quantitatively(important).

There is, literally, zero evidence pointing to any gods though. If there were quantitative evidence, we'd accept it just as we do with anything else. Remember, "I don't know enough about this system, so a god must have made it" is not evidence.

In fact, it has turned out wrong every time in history. I've highlighted this before, but we attributed several phenomenon to gods when we didn't understand the systems causing them. Earthquakes, sickness, wind... then we discovered plate tectonics, pathogens, and differential heating/Earth's rotation.

God of the gaps.

The event horizon proves space was created by the event of a mind with broad horizons.
i.e. God.

Originally posted by Wonder Man
The event horizon proves space was created by the event of a mind with broad horizons.
i.e. God.
durmask

Originally posted by Klaw
God of the gaps.
durmask Hi Eon

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
From article:
science is the application of mathematics to the real world.

That’s why Neptune was theorized to exist before it was even observed.

no offense mods, i appreciate your effort, but ush would have moved this dogshit thread to the religion or conspiracy forum, so fast that few in the gdf even have known it existed. just saying...yeah i know he was quite a pill, but i do miss his thread-fu, especially now

Originally posted by Klaw
God of the gaps.

Nah, that is what evolutionists' "god" is-- Time. 👆

"Just give it enough time and anything is possible!" 😂

No, I'm sorry but I don't care how much time they have they'll never get a frog to turn into a prince. It's still a fairytale whether it happens immediately or whether it takes billions of years. 😉

Evolution in the macro darwinian sense is the dumbest, most retarded religion in the history of the world... bar none. 👆

Not to mention the most dangerous and completely and utterly useless.

They can call it "science" all they like but in truth it has absolutely NOTHING to do with real science... nothing.

Originally posted by Robtard

ps I'm not an atheist 🙂

I wonder if Star knows that many religious people disagree with him too?

A Christian was one of the largest contributors to what became the "geologic column" that Star rejects. And he was a high ranking member of the church too. 😱

Nicolas Steno

Originally posted by Klaw
God of the gaps.

That is correct. 👆

Ethneo effectively wears horse blinders when it comes to anything that challenges his believes and biases.

In a thousand years love can redeem. Then even if you die you had the power to do right. Now Believe.

be gone wonderbot!

When you achieve the primary objective you have primacy.
Then you can help people like a little old lady to cross the road.
A feature that is found in joy can be one small step for man 👨.