When I issued a BZ where Hulk was going to hit Cho hard enough to kill him (per your words) and it somehow get twisted, it needs to get ignored. Yes, this hit would've killed Cho...
Originally posted by lawest9
When you told him " let's do it this Saturday', you just reposted your own words
Originally posted by carver9
Let's do this Saturday. The only thing that I feel needs to be said is "Darksaint goal is to prove that Hulk was about to kill Cho here and Carver9 goal is to prove that Hulk wasn't going to kill Cho in this scene"?
Read that then answer this question. Would this hit have killed human Cho?
Simple yes or no.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I was saying he was in a rage, and had Herc not been there, it would've ended badly. No killing, but hurting would have taken place.
WWhere does my post mention oh wait, it's when I specifically said no killing.
Originally posted by carver9
When I issued a BZ where Hulk was going to hit Cho hard enough to kill him (per your words) and it somehow get twisted, it needs to get ignored. Yes, this hit would've killed Cho...
Where does your post say kill?
Face it, you phucked up 😂
Originally posted by carver9Of course it would have, who could deny that?
Read that then answer this question. Would this hit have killed human Cho?Simple yes or no.
Originally posted by carver9
We can BZ as long as you stick by your stance, that Hulk was about to hit Cho with a punch that had Hercules reeling over? Is that what you're saying?
My question. Dark agreed to do it and then when I mentioned that the hit would obviously kill Cho, he said "not kill but Hulk was going to put a hurting on him". I don't even know what TF that means. This started with Dark trying to paint a picture that Hulk was going to hit Cho and a puppy and said that if Herc wasn't there to stop the hit, Hulk would've hit him with the same attack. I disagreed and posted evidence supporting it. Then Dark said Hulk would put a hurting on him. Hulk could throw a pebble at Cho feet and it would hurt. Why would I accept a ridiculous challenge? So Dark, who changed his stance got ignored.
Originally posted by carver9
My question. Dark agreed to do it and then when I mentioned that the hit would obviously kill Cho, he said "not kill but Hulk was going to put a hurting on him". I don't even know what TF that means. This started with Dark trying to paint a picture that Hulk was going to hit Cho and a puppy and said that if Herc wasn't there to stop the hit, Hulk would've hit him with the same attack. I disagreed and posted evidence supporting it. Then Dark said Hulk would put a hurting on him. Hulk could throw a pebble at Cho feet and it would hurt. Why would I accept a ridiculous challenge? So Dark, who changed his stance got ignored.
Such lies. Carvy is so easily shown up here.
Top of page 21:
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I was saying he was in a rage, and had Herc not been there, it would've ended badly. No killing, but hurting would have taken place.
Middle of page 21 (so AFTER I said no killing), Carvy then issues his challenge:
Originally posted by carver9
You're falsely painting a picture that Hulk would've punched Cho when that isn't the case. Is this what you are saying? If so, I will happily battlezone this. Are you saying Hulk was going to full fledge punch Cho the same way he hit Herc?
I had ALREADY clarified that no killing would have taken place. Carvy THEN issues a challenge, then says I am the one changing stance?
He is such a lying troll
Dark, read my statement again AFTER the underline section of your post. A full fledged hit would kill Cho. I referenced that on multiple occasions to you. There's no way around it, it would be past hurting, he wouldve died and I simply asked you if he was going to hit him with the same full fledged hit Herc stopped which again, would kill him. You're just changing your stance because I posted scans previously proving your first post about Hulk aiming at Cho was false. You didn't want to accept that I pooped on your post and now you're trying to change stance and twist your argument.
Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
What am I missing here? Wasn't it already shown in TIH?Hulk would avoid making direct contact, as seen in his solo run during that event.
Yep, Incredible Hulk 107 and 108 shows this. I posted the scans and this is when everything changed to just hurting. Hulk goal that entire time was to hit Hercules. He wasn't aiming at Cho even though it appeared as if he was.
Originally posted by carver9
Dark, read my statement again AFTER the underline section of your post. A full fledged hit would kill Cho. I referenced that on multiple occasions to you. There's no way around it, it would be past hurting, he wouldve died and I simply asked you if he was going to hit him with the same full fledged hit Herc stopped which again, would kill him. You're just changing your stance because I posted scans previously proving your first post about Hulk aiming at Cho was false. You didn't want to accept that I pooped on your post and now you're trying to change stance and twist your argument.
Lmao, reported for trolling.
I clarified no killing. You then issued your challenge. I said he would've hit Cho. You quoted me saying no killing. I said multiple times no killing.
Then you turn around and say 'Oh Dark, you keep changing'.
My post, BEFORE your stupid challenge, said NO KILLING. Are you incapable of reading the words that are coming out of my typing?
Originally posted by carver9
Don't care about you reporting me, lmao. I clearly said in my post after that was Hulk going to hit him with the same blow he used on Herc THAT WOULD HAVE KILLED CHO. Again, no way around that. Now scoot scoot.
But...the Hulk doesn't kill. This is pretty simple to grasp.
Originally posted by carver9
If Hulk would've hit Cho with that same blow, it would've killed him. How are you not understanding this?
And I'm saying Hulk wouldn't have killed because Gamma Maths. How do you not understand this?
However, as I said from the start, he would still have hit Cho. A mere human with a puppy. Who was trying to help him.
That's.....I mean, if a kid with a puppy offers to help me, I'm not hitting them full stop. Hulk would have.
He wouldn't have killed him (as I said), but hitting in the first place is still hardly holding back.
Or would you, Carver 9, hit kids who are trying to help?
Originally posted by carver9
Dark, you're not making sense. He hit Herc with enough force to make him acknowledge the blow. How in the heck do you not think this same blow would NOT kill human level Cho?
Because Gamma Maths. He'd have pulled his punches to not kill Cho (confirmed on panel that Gamma Maths is always running).
But he still would have punched him. A fricking kid with a puppy. Pulling punches is still a punch. If Tyson punched me in the street, just because he wasn't going to kill me, doesn't mean he's still a douche for punching me FOR OFFERING TO HELP HIM.